The Pros And Cons Of Body Cameras

Many citizens believe anything that they see in the media and do not like what they see because it seems to unreal to watch what officers are doing. Videos that go on the internet go viral very fast because many people dislike what they see so they feel the right thing to do is share the video with others so they can see how brutal police officers. All officers do not like to see themselves as an officer that does any kind of brutality, especially on the media knowing many people will hate that specific person because of that one video. The videos that go viral are for citizens to view what is happening around them and to see any cruelty that officers can do. During the first week of September, police killed more civilians than the total number of police officers killed so far this year.

Although many people believe there is no action being taken to fix this problem local communities have been trying to engage with the police, countless protests have taken place, and the government has been creating laws for police to stop this issue. In the wake of recent incidents there has been tension between the local communities of America and the police. Many feel threatened by the police because of their militarization that they have equipped. The novel

Mistakes happen everyday, usually it’s because of a simple mistake you might’ve made. But sometimes one or more people can screw up and you’ll get pinned for it too. Every year veterans become homeless and unwanted by the general public just for the reason of “all veterans are criminals of war”, which is completely false. It’s just the fact that some veterans act out in illegal activities while the rest are getting pinned for it. In many cases, veterans are trying their best not to get involved with illegal activities, but the general public still looks down on every veteran like they are all criminals.

The consistent abuse of power by police within the same communities often raises question of protection of life and liberty. While it is hard to determine the exact extent of police abuse, it is evident though streams of media reports, protesting, and the occasional riot, that many in society fear, that police abuse of power has become the norm and that the abuse is violating their basis human and civil rights. This paper briefly discusses relatable events that can be understood by most, as to why police actions of abuse have caused protest and riots, especially in the minority communities, where the overgrowing concerns by the public is that police abuse of power has shifted from

Phrases that he uses in order to give anger are for example; “There are many problems”, “one interrogates”, “this time of heightened concern”, “Do we really want?”, and many more of phrases and questions with the same tone. The pathos used is not very persuasive because of the lack of evidence, and the lack of back ground information. For the most part, Coates uses pathos as his supporting evidence. We can see this in the beginning of the article when he makes the audience question recent police actions as just. He continues by mentioning the names of suspects whom were killed by the police with a little bit of background information to make the audience feel anger towards the situations.

Police officers are always looking for a target and they end up finding the perfect person to penalize. For example, many people are usually shocked when they find out that the reason they were pulled over was not, in fact, against the law, and end up penalized. In my opinion police officers should really focus on stopping crimes such as rapes, robbery, murders etc. Those crimes should have high penalties, but crimes such as speeding, driving without a license, carrying a small amount of drug should not equal the same prison time for a major crime for ethnic minorities. Therefore, unreasonable suspicions, pre-texts used by officers and jail time are things that play a huge role regarding the criminal justice system that affects the way ethnic minorities are

Racial Profiling Essay Racial profiling is a longstanding, national problem in the United States of America. Racial profiling occurs everyday, in cities and towns across the country, when law enforcement and private security target people of color and humiliating and often frightening them with searches without evidence of anything related to a crime. This profiling is based on race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion. Citizens in America always assume that when an official is detaining a person of color it is because of discrimination but in another point of view it is the right action. I agree that Racial Profiling is wrong but in some cases it is justifiable .

Personally I picked up on this and I hated this aspect of the film. In these neighborhoods, police sometimes don’t even show up when they are called, so I found it ironic that an officer was always around when the two major crimes were taking place in the film. People are also often know to use tactics as checkpoints looking for drunk drivers in order to arrest undocumented Latinx. Perez goes on to describe a scene of police brutality and says that if films would like to show violence in these communities they should show where the violence is actually stemming

For decades now, the controversy over deadly force has continued to show up in the news when police officers have acted in a manner that some citizens find just while others deem completely unfair. Many lawsuits stemming from shootings and crimes have found their way to local courts or the Supreme Court to deal with this issue. A portion of the U.S. population finds deadly force unnecessary when non-lethal weapons such as pepper spray or batons just as easily subdue the criminal. In addition, these citizens argue that officers might be liable for cases filed against them if they use excess force on people that seem suspicious but have not actually committed a crime. On the other hand, the opposing argument in favor of deadly force states that

5) This means that American’s don 't have something to defend themselves against dangerous things. This would result in immense fear in the U.S. “After the ban was enacted, the homicides trended up until they reached a peak of 18.0 in 2003.” (King, par. 4) This means that the ban didn’t do anything to help the citizens. It is simply doing the opposite. This would result in chaos and, worse, people getting guns