Banned Books: Good or Bad? Should students be exposed to the real world through books or should they be shielded from it? There are many people who agree that banned books should be banned because it is ethical, and valid and it prevents students from emotional stress. On the other side of the argument, people argue that students have the right to read whatever they want. Many books are challenged and banned in schools because they contain inappropriate content or bad language; however, some people have a strong belief that these books are worth reading because they represent ideas of free speech and other important lessons that students will need throughout their lives On the pro side of the argument, there are many reasons why some people support banning books in schools.
Is banning books the best idea? Banning books limits children’s reading interest, including religiously. The banning of textbooks with religion in them shows this, the fact that literature helps young people feel as if they are not alone in the world helps with reading interest, as does the fact that literature can help provide a neutral way to start a conversation. Parents shouldn’t be allowed to take away children’s availability to read a certain book just because they don’t want their kid reading a book. Reading creates a virtual reality for kids, and just because you may not like something does not give you the right to take it away from everyone.
Banned Books Do you enjoy reading books? Weather your answer is yes or no, books are an important part of your life. Most students in schools today, learn better if they read over the information in a book. Everyone learns in a different way and not all people learn just by reading the information, so banning books wouldn't affect those people as much, but what happens to the people who need books to learn? Books are slowly becoming less needed due to the use of the modern technology.
Books, Should We Ban Them Or Not: Banned books are books that have been taken out of public environments because of many different reasons. Books should not be banned simply because we have the rights to any books. Banned Books can teach important things about our history. Books that have been banned teach great morals/lesson even with the negative content. Banning Books infringes on people 's personal rights.
Banned books are being taught in schools for a reason. Banning books from schools or libraries interferes with people’s first amendment rights. Children or other people should be able to read whatever they would like. For example, “Everyone should have an opportunity to read any literature of their choosing and form his or her own opinions based on the reading,” (Naha 1). When children are young, their brains are like sponges, they are absorbing all of the information around them and processing it in their own way.
When it comes to the teaching about banned books and such the teacher can also provide information such as a website for example so that the students can use it to learn more about banned books and become more aware of the topic. Something else along with that includes giving instances in which books have or have been tried for being banned. (Linder) When also showing these books to students and introducing them to these books it could expose them to different viewpoints and ideas on different topics. (Breslin) These books may also have something for us to learn about or understand like the author of one of the articles Liz Breslin said about reading the book Into the River by Ted Dawe and she said “Anyway, I like the contextual irony of almost the last conversation in the currently banned book. It starts like this: “Life’s not complicated; it’s just a series of choices between right and wrong.” So Mr Faull says to Devon on page 278.
The Pros and Cons of Banning Books There are two sides to the book banning: those for it and those against it. These sources will show why books get banned. First, there is the author Macey France she makes her point of saying why books should be banned by showing the bad parts of banned books. The next author, Jenni White has a similar approach and even uses a quote from France. This next author, Emma Greguska writes her point about how we should not ban books, saying these books prepare the students for the future and teaches them how to deal with real-life problems in a safe space.
The Dangers of Book Banning The practice of challenging or banning books has long been a strategy used to label reading materials as offensive on moral, religious, or political, grounds. Books are being banned for containing offensive materials. It is argued that people can become influenced by detrimental ideas. The First Amendment expresses that citizens have the right to freedom of speech and freedom of the press. The pros of being against book banning is the First Amendment, parental control, and true facts and occurrences.
2.2 Describe the impact of prejudice and discrimination on children and young people An environment of prejudice and discrimination will have a very negative impact on children. It will impact on emotional development, it could affect their confidence, low self of steam, they might find it hard to make friends, might make them feel angry and confused. This could also affect their education and progress and their wellbeing. 2.3 Assess how own attitudes, values and behaviour could impact on work with children and young
Subsequently, high school students are old enough to understand and learn from the topics discussed in this book. As Stephen Chbosky said, “banning books gives us silence when we need speech. It closes our ears when we need to listen. It makes us blind when we need