ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Burning The Flag

1085 Words5 Pages

Jackson Rice
Mrs. Mininni
English III Honors
April 28th, 2023

The legality of burning the flag is not a debated subject, but the question of should it be legal is. Burning the flag is protected under the First Amendment; however, a recent poll shows that a majority of U.S citizens disagree. Burning the flag in a form of protest should not be legal because the flag is a symbol of the country, honoring the flag demonstrates loyalty to the country, and the flag honors the sacrifice that soldiers have paid for this country. The flag is a symbol of the country. It represents the freedom and union of America: “The U.S. flag is considered such a sacred symbol that burning it in an undignified manner constitutes desecration”(How to properly dispose …show more content…

Like stated before, the flag is a symbol of the country. When someone honors or respects the flag in any way, whether that be the Pledge of Allegiance or just simply keeping the flag clean, this honors the country. This shows a great deal of loyalty, showing that these people will stand beside America: “Treason, the crime of betraying a nation or sovereign”(Encyclopædia Britannica, inc. (2023, April 17). Treason. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved April 28, 2023, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/treason ). When someone commits treason he is betraying his nation, in this case the United States of America. Make no mistake, burning the flag is disrespecting America. When people burn the American flag, they are protesting against America, and are betraying their country. According to definition, this is treason. The military represents loyalty to their country and they created the requirements of proper treatment of the flag. Intentionally going against the protocols and rules they made for the American flag is a protest to the military. Because the military swear their lives to protect us from foreign harm or attacks, they represent the very idea of loyalty to America. A person has no excuse to say that he can burn the flag of his country and simultaneously be loyal to …show more content…

Not only does the flag represent this country and its freedom, but it also is a symbol of the military and their brave actions to protect this country. Not many can say that they gave their life to benefit the well-being of America. The ones who can, even though they are dead, are very proud to be able to say that. Even though it cost them their lives, they know their country appreciates what they did and that the citizens will live better because of it. People dishonor all of that the moment they intentionally set flame to the flag, to what these brave soldiers fought for. The military themselves do not let members burn the flag for this exact reason: “Any member of the military that disrespects the flag in any way will face disciplinary actions”(Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). 18 U.S. Code § 700 - desecration of the flag of the United States; penalties. Legal Information Institute. Retrieved April 28, 2023, from https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/700). They understand that even if it is considered protected under freedom of speech, any citizen or member of the military still should definitely not burn the flag. However, even though some disagree with whether or not it should be legal, it is legal. Back in 1989 a certain person by the name of Gregory Johnson burned the American flag in protest while he lived in Texas. Texas had a law against burning the flag, and they were going to punish

Show More
Related

  • Essay On Confederate Flag

    553 Words  | 3 Pages

    Opponents of the flag, on the other hand, recognize this racist connotation. They see the flag as a lingering emblem of a war that divided the nation and was fought in the name of slavery and

    Read More

  • Summary Of Majority Opinions By William Brennan

    253 Words  | 2 Pages

    The general argument made by author William J. Brennan in his work, “Majority Opinion,” is that it is legal to burn the flag if it is a form of political protest. More specifically, Brennan argues that we can not criminally punish people for burning a flag: the only thing we can do is convince them that they are wrong. He writes that they only thing we can do is “ Persuade them that they are wrong.” In this passage, Brennan suggests that criminally punishing a person for burning the flag will decrease the values of the flag by opposing the First Amendment. In conclusion, Brennan’s belief is that we should not punish people for burning the flag, but convince them that they are wrong.

    Read More

  • Texas Vs Johnson Pros And Cons

    702 Words  | 3 Pages

    People can burn state flags, the presidential seals and even the constitution if they were able to get ahold of it. The racial group, KKK, is allowed to discriminate on the basis of race, causing outrage and defiant behavior, but they are not stopped because they are expressing free speech. The same thing Johnson was doing when he was burning the flag because to him to was expressing his speech in a symbolic way. Although Johnson was imprisoned for one year after burning the flag, flags are constantly being burnt by the armed forces. When a flag has become old and worn out they have a ceremony which eventually leads to the burning of the flag.

    Read More

  • Texas V Johnson Majority Opinion Analysis

    800 Words  | 4 Pages

    Although some people believe it is disrespectful to burn the flag, we as American have the right to protest in a non-violent manner. Whether someone believe burning the flag is alright or not, they still want to be treated equal despite their

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Flag Burning

    746 Words  | 3 Pages

    Burning the flag could not harm a citizen in any way except incite anger. Burning the flag is a representation of a person’s feelings: therefore it is considered “symbolic speech.” In order to amend the Constitution how might Congress define their view of a flag? Since a flag is only a symbol; would that make it illegal to burn a drawing of the American flag? In the Supreme Court case Texas v. Johnson, Justice Stevens argued that “the flag’s unique status as a symbol of national unity outweighed “symbolic speech” (United States Courts).

    Read More

  • United States Vs Eichman Essay

    820 Words  | 4 Pages

    A 5-to-4 decision held that Johnson's burning of a flag was protected expression under the First Amendment and all charges were dropped. In response to this ruling Congress passed the Flag Protection Act Of 1989. “The act states that ‘whoever knowingly mutilates, defaces, physically defiles, burns, maintains on the floor or ground, or tramples upon any flag of the United States shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.’ The act does not prohibit any conduct consisting of the disposal of a flag when it has become worn or soiled." (1989).

    Read More

  • Controversial Issues In The Texas V. Johnson Case

    1182 Words  | 5 Pages

    One year later, United States v. Eichman was decided by the court as the Flag Protection Act of 1989 that would have protected the American flag from desecration. However, the Court ruled it’s unconstitutional to punish persons for flag burning while protesting in political events. [ United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Burning The American Flag

    559 Words  | 3 Pages

    Should someone be locked up for burning the American Flag? Yes, because the American represents unity and freedom between all 50 states. Most of the U.S. may have become emotional, because of what happened to the flag. Desecrating an American Flag was a criminal offense in Texas, as it was under federal law and in 48 of the 50 states. Johnson was arrested and charged with violating the flag.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Was Johnson Burning The American Flag?

    420 Words  | 2 Pages

    Here I stand to say that for Johnson to burn the flag is very disturbing to our country as well to our peers. For him to do that wasn’t right and very rude. Many U.S. troops fight for our flag each and every day for our freedom and for us to live a natural free life instead of having many rules that would over power us.

    Read More

  • Dylan Roof: Symbol Of Racism

    1705 Words  | 7 Pages

    Many maintain that the flag was cemented as a symbol of racism during the Civil Rights era, during which “Political displays of the battle flag of Dixie (the historical nickname for the states that seceded from the Union) only really resurfaced when that racial order was challenged by northern liberals.” But the flag of the Confederacy could not become a symbol of anything by that time-- the Confederacy was dead, and anything it came to mean afterwards was the result of its original meanings and uses being distorted by individual racists whose acts it could not, and certainly would not, endorse. Even today the flags of many modern nations are adopted for the use of racist groups: the Pan-African flag was adopted by the New Black Panthers, the British flag adopted by the National Front, and the ghgjgjh flag adopted by the dfghfhgf. These modern nations have the ability to disavow any and all extremist groups associated with their flag. Dead nations have no such privileges.

    Read More

  • Racism: The Confederate Flag

    539 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some people think the Confederate Flag is racist. Many people believe that the flag stands for an ugly time in our history because the flag was made during a time where people owned slaves and how the black people were unfairly treated. Many years have been passed on but till this day there are many emotions spreading just like wild fire. Another piece of evidence is that even in the year 2015, by displaying the flag everyone knows it means hostility, which means someone may not be showing an act of kindness which in this case it may offend many people due to its background history. So if the flag were to be displayed many people can take it to offense and may not show any respect of what this flag has done and is.

    Read More

  • Effects Of Flag Desecration

    305 Words  | 2 Pages

    A public flag burning in protest of a recently enacted law is protected by the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause. The desecration of flag burning is idiomatic to the 21st century. Flag burning became an issue in the U.S. after the Civil War and since that time has had a drastic history. "Congress passed the Federal Flag Desecration Law in 1968" (Head, 2017). The law banned all exhibition of abhorrence against the flag.

    Read More

  • Flag Burning Debate

    1876 Words  | 8 Pages

    Does destruction of an object qualify s free speech? Is the flag a symbol of the Ideology of the United States or merely a symbolic representation of said ideas? Personally I feel the flag stands alone, it is to be revealed and protect at all cost. As I was researching this bill I was exposed to many views. I tended to take to heart the views of those who were aligned along my own viewpoint.

    Read More

  • Texas Vs Johnson Pros And Cons

    1872 Words  | 8 Pages

    According to Robert T. Schatz and Howard Lavine, "the power of national symbols to rouse impassioned emotion and behavior has been noted by scholars from a variety of disciplines." It is not surprising that those who are passionate about the patriotism that comes along with a display of the American flag would be offended by such a blatantly disrespectful action against the flag. However, just because something is considered offensive does not necessarily mean it should be prohibited by

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Stop Burning The American Flag !

    595 Words  | 3 Pages

    The burning of the American flag should not be protected by the First Amendment. Gregory Lee Johnson was convicted of burning the flag in violation of the Texas Law. After a march, he burned the flag in protest during the 1984 Republican National Convention. No one was hurt during this demonstration.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Burning The Flag

Open Document