The Death Penalty The world can be a dark, cruel place to live in , it seems like everyday a horrendous crime is committed like murder, kidnaping and rape. These crimes are enough proof that there is enough evil in the world. It is necessary that society has the death penalty to prevent the possibility of recurrence. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice before killing for fear of losing their own life.The death penalty should be allowed because it is important to show other criminals that it is not okay for their horrendous acts they are committing and that they should be punished for their actions. Some may argue that the death penalty should not be allowed because it does not help prevent
The capital punishment is identified as the most radical means of punishment that is aimed at decreasing the number of the murders and other severe crimes that can happen on the streets. However, it is still not proven that the death penalty is effective in terms of reducing the crime rates. As the opponents of the capital punishment claim, “essential objectives the death penalty is meant to serve—crime control, deterrence and retribution—can be achieved without it, and are often not achieved with it” (Šimonović 183). First of all, the death penalty does not perform its main function as a means of punishment directed at the correction of the criminals. Furthermore, through the capital punishment, it is possible to take only one criminal off the streets while others will
In many cases such questions like “Does the capital punishment really deter crimes?” arises. It’s true that there is no alternative to one’s life but statistics show that in countries like the U.S., Singapore and many other where the death penalty is allowed, there is significant reduction heinous crimes. In 1993 – 1997 murder rate dropped from 24,562 – 18,209 respectively, a 26% reduction rate. Using countries like Singapore, China, etc. where death sentences can be rarely appealed, far less crimes can be observed.
It also saves taxpayers money. The annual cost is $31,286 per inmate, coming straight from taxpayers pockets (Santora). If you agree with the statement “an eye for an eye” you should agree that the death penalty should be legalized throughout the United States of America, the country would be a much more economical and safer place to live comfortably. There have been hundreds of studies to prove that capital punishment is an effective way to prevent crime, some people even think abolishing the death penalty is a good idea, but it's quite clear that capital punishment reduces crime and makes this country safer to live in. “EXECUTING PEOPLE FOR MURDER deters other people from committing other murders.” (Tucker).
David Muhlhausen, a researcher says that “between executions and reduced murder rates... In short, capital punishment does, in fact, save lives” (Top 10 Pro & Con Arguments). Therefore, the death penalty should be kept as an option for deterrence because it gives families closure and proves as a worthy
Firstly, death teaches the convicted nothing. He who committed the crime is sentenced to death and not given the chance to think through his/her miscarriages of justice. However, a person is never executed immediately, therefore they are given a sufficient amount of time to not only fear their fate but also rethink their actions and misdoings. Notwithstanding, capital punishment, however much feared, won 't necessarily dissuade criminals to continue committing crimes. This may be because the perpetrator is either psychotic and enjoys committing felonies or the offender simply doesn 't fear death.
While some may say it seems barbaric to still have a death penalty, the U.S. says it 's used as a crime deterrent. While the thought of death may be a deterrent, it 's typically not thought about during the forbidden actions, meaning that its actually not barbaric enough. The death penalty is ineffective, because its main purposes are to give some consolation to the victim 's family, and to be a crime deterrent. The main problem with this is that it doesn 't work at all as a crime deterrent. According to “Study: 88% of criminologists do not believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent” in 2008 88.2% of criminologists surveyed did not believe that the death penalty is effective.
It means that innocent people wouldn’t be getting executed for crimes they did not commit or were framed for. It means that families would be able to get answers for their questions and would maybe be able to start working towards forgiveness. The death penalty only really does harm when thinking of the big picture and the overall effects of this penalty. Without this possibility in the world, there would be a possibility of cohesion to happen more amongst different races and
Hanging criminals became the usual way to carry out this type of sentence, but today the use of lethal injections put the criminals to sleep. George Bush once stated “I don’t think you should support the death penalty to seek revenge. I don’t think that’s right. I think the reason to support the death penalty is because it saves other people’s lives.” The death penalty is a punishment that gets rid of the criminal and puts ease towards the victims. As far back as the Ancient Laws of China, the death penalty has been established as a punishment for crimes.
The death penalty is the act of punishing a criminal to death who has committed a crime such as first-degree murder, espionage, or treason. This process can also be called capital punishment. The death penalty law started to become a controversial topic in the early 20th century after World War 1. Opponents of the death penalty argue the inhumane, unconstitutional, and wrongly accused aspects of the death penalty. Proponents argue the financial savings, deterrent effects, and retribution aspects of the death penalty.