The Pros And Cons Of Citizenship Test

814 Words4 Pages

FINAL SPEECH BEGINS! Both literacy tests and citizenship tests have been deemed unconstitutional as of the late 1960’s. In the past, tests like these have been unfairly administered, and still have a negative ambience surrounding them ever since. It took until 1920 for everyone above the required age to be able to vote, and sometimes these tests were the problem. There’s also been instances where we might have benefited from these exams. However, it’s not a closed case. The debate is still persisting. A periodic citizenship test would allow everyone to have about the same amount of knowledge about the US by being informed about current events. If a periodic citizenship test were to be conducted, it should incorporate current events to keep citizens informed. As of right now, people having to earn their citizenship know more about the US than some civilians that were born in the America do. This is because many of them g want to become citizens very much, so they study about the US and its history. It would be useful for all Americans to be informed like this, not only for personal safety, but also for the safety of America. Providing citizenship tests lead to many cons. If you take a citizenship test you will have to take a civics test. The test will cover basic U.S. history and government. They would start when you turn 18 provided your basic schooling is done. Then you would have to take the test every 4 years. If you were born in America you should be a citizen

Open Document