The Pros And Cons Of Classical Liberalism

1392 Words6 Pages
Classical liberalism, the term in politics, is a retrospective of distinguishing to old liberalism from new liberalism in the early 19th century. It is which it believed that the government that governed least governed best. Until now, it was referred to all forms of liberalism, such as social liberalism or economic liberalism, prior to the arrival of liberals and conservatives. Compared to liberalism, classical liberalism assumed that individuals are rational and capable of overcoming obstacles without resorting to violence. In philosophy, classical liberalism separately protects the freedom as well as property rights. It also limits the government’s power. During the past summer, there was news involving classical liberalism. The statements people make about it can be investigated, when it comes to…show more content…
What Epstein said establishes credibility because liberals fought hard in political styles. On September 26, 2014, Cassandra Wilkinson of The Centre talked about pluralism concerning between classical liberalism and conservatism. She stated: “Classical liberalism is certainly not a synonym for conservative. In his essay 'Why I am not a Conservative ' Friedrich Hayek made plain the differences. Conservatism reflects a cautious attitude to change and a Burkean recognition of the value of institutions which have served humankind over time as proven repositories and safeguards of wisdom — the family, the rule of law, parliament and universities and for some people the church (The Centre for Independent Studies).” Wilkinson meant that liberals were different than conservatives. What she said establishes creditability because she shows comparisons between liberals and conservatives and what their actions are. On October 15, 2014, Mario Rizzo of Library of Law and Liberty argued about classical liberalism and liberty. He
Open Document