ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Congressional Gridlocks

1098 Words5 Pages

Congressional gridlock is not an uncommon thing in congress. Congressional gridlock happens when there is difficulty passing a law that is trying to satisfy the needs of the people. Gridlock often makes us feel stuck. Neither political party can reach an agreement to enforce a law on an issue, therefore they continue to meet and discuss until a conclusion is made. Gridlock is also referred to as “deadlock” or “political stalemate” because it is almost as if there is nothing either party can do. Congressional gridlock is a very common thing in our legislature among issues like immigration, health care, gun violence, national defense, etc. Gridlock is something that will always be an issue as long as there are two opposing political parties. …show more content…

Many argue that our congress does whatever they can to make it look like they’re all together and uniform, but really they are completely broken in a way that is not easy to fix. Deadlock can be caused by a lack of Congressional moderates, who are the people who vote on an issue regardless of their affiliation. There are currently six of them but that number is subjected to decrease. Another reason of gridlock could also be gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is a strategic way of making sure party members get what they want when it comes to voting. As citizens, the only thing that we can do to help fight against gerrymandering would be to use our legislative powers and fight for more transparent and public system within their states to hold elected officials accountable. Even if we were able to fix gerrymandering, it still would not be enough to fix gridlock. If we were able to fix gridlock, it still would not solve close to any of the problems rooted in Washington. It seems as though we are waiting for the problems to fix themselves, but we need to realize it isn't a problem that can fix itself. Each state needs to work within itself every ten

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Charles O. Jones's Perspectives On The Presidency

    459 Words  | 2 Pages

    In “Perspectives on the Presidency” from The Presidency in a Separated System, Charles O. Jones argues that the United States government is not merely influenced and led by the president. Jones argues in favor of the United States having a separated system, rather than a presidential system. In this separated system, the role of the president varies, depending on resources and strategy. Jones proceeds to discuss two types of perspectives of the president; the Dominant Perspective and the Alternative Perspective. In the Dominant Perspective, political parties are stronger than they normally are in a system of separated elections, the opposing party acts as a critic of the party in power, and the president is, idealistically, aggressive.

    Read More

  • Brian Schaffner's Party Polarization

    768 Words  | 4 Pages

    In his chapter on Party Polarisation, Brian Schaffner draws upon a range of research in order to examine the extent to which external and internal factors have caused the polarisation of Congress as identified by research drawing upon Poole and Rosenthal’s NOMINATE scoring. Such research found that legislative voting in both the House and the Senate has become increasingly split along party lines over the last four decades. Several explanations have been put forward to suggest why this may be the case, although, for the most part, each of these explanations is consistent one of two broader schools of thought on the issue. The first of these is the belief that it is external (outside of the legislature) factors that have caused Congress to become so polarised.

    Read More

  • Congressional Activity Summary

    813 Words  | 4 Pages

    Congressional Activity As it is suggested by the title of the article, Presentation of Partisanship: Constituency Connections and Partisan Congressional Activity by Scott R. Meinke, House members play an imperative role by informing their constituents in regards to the work the members partake in partisan Washington D.C., the nation’s capital. Going into depth, this article challenges and explores the extent of the choice to which the House members “relate their involvement in partisan Washington activity to constituency representation.” (Meinke 854) In essence, Meinke, within the article, discusses that many members of the House involve themselves with committees and higher chair positions within those committees, as well as whip networks

    Read More

  • Bipartisanship In Congress

    137 Words  | 1 Pages

    Bipartisanship in Congress has not changed much since the 1970s. The dichotomy between before War Powers resolution and after makes theorizing about the relationship as a dividing line between Foreign policy surround a dangerous international environment into one that is a function of a resurgent Congress. The more we get through the 21st Century the more it seems as Congress having more and more of an influence and acting not in concert with the President while hearing loudly what the People of the U.S. know and hear about through the media. It is likely that without any incentives for stopping politics as usual, they both will most likely continue to shape policy according to their own political needs. Further evolution has occurred due to

    Read More

  • Comparing The Political Theorists Of Cox, And Mccubbins

    1483 Words  | 6 Pages

    The political theorists David R. Mayhew, Gary W. Cox, and Matthew D. McCubbins argue on how the US Congress functions. They focus on the members of Congress and their actions. The basis of disagreement between the theorists lies in what Congress members find of importance. Mayhew argues that members of Congress, primarily concern themselves with reelection, as such, any action taken only benefits that. Cox and McCubbins’, however, formulate that Congress functions on the basis of majority party control and unity.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

    712 Words  | 3 Pages

    Proportional representation is the easiest, fairest way not only to eliminate the desire for gerrymandering but also to rein in extremism. If you get 51% of a district's vote, you don't get the entire seat; you get 51% of it. Your opponent, who won 49%, doesn't get nothing; she/he gets 49% of it. That's exactly representative of the people's will. It also means the more people you attract, the more value your legislative vote has.

    Read More

  • Congress Plan Pros And Cons

    213 Words  | 1 Pages

    Congress has the best plan for the U.S. Reconstruction. The plan Congress made gives freedmen the right to vote. It recognizes freedmen 's rights as well. Congress’s plan lets the Southerns keep their property but doesn’t reimburse them for all of their lost and damaged property. The plan uses military law and governors.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

    1008 Words  | 5 Pages

    Gerrymandering Gerrymandering is the redrawing of political boundaries, otherwise known as district lines, in a state to give one party a numeric advantage over the opposing party. This is done by dividing districts up into highly irregular sections to achieve the goal of having voters from a particular party highly concentrated in some areas and thinly scattered in other areas (Donnelly, Fortune). Gerrymandering has been criticized because it violates the two basic principles in electoral designation; compactness and equality of size of constituencies in electoral designation (The Editors, Britannica). There is currently no law against the process of Gerrymandering. However, the current Supreme Court case Gill v. Whitford could change that.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Term Limits Of Congress

    597 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mystie Robinson American Government Term Limits of Congress The United States Congress is a bicameral legislature of the United States of America’s federal government. Congress has two parts: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Members of Congress can spend many years in office. They don’t have term limits.

    Read More

  • What Is Party Polarization?

    273 Words  | 2 Pages

    Party polarization is the division between the two major parties on most policy issues, with members of each party is unified around their party’s position with little crossover. The competing explanations for polarization are how congressional representatives are elected, lawmakers selecting a candidate for office and as congressional districts and states have become more homogeneous. Every 10 years, congressional district geographic boundaries are redrawn so that each district has roughly the same population. These districts are increasingly drawn to be safe for one political party or another so that the district has a clear majority of either republicans or Democrats. This process is known as gerrymandering.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

    442 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gerrymandering restrictions is likely to be a key topic of debate for the Supreme Court as partisan lines have tested the constitutionality of the act. While this process of redrawing boundary lines has been around for a long time, it is not the same that it once was. The act of gerrymandering and redrawing boundaries has become more of a drastic partisan act in the modern election world than ever before because of technology. The 1986 Supreme Court ruling in Davis v. Bandemer declared partisan gerrymandering for electoral advantage justiciable under the United States Constitution. The asymmetry standard in testing for gerrymandering states that the act needs to exhibit intentions that partisan gerrymandering would be recognized for its given distribution of popular votes, if parties switch who holds the popular vote and if the number of seats in a district would change unequally based on Supreme Court cases Vieth v. Jubelirer and LULAC v. Perry.

    Read More

  • Essay On Congressional Term Limits

    700 Words  | 3 Pages

    This statement can be backed up by the fact that, “…historically the incumbent is re-elected 90% of the time” (Weeks). To make this complete, it leaves almost no chance for new members to enter congress due to how well known the previous congress member is. Not to mention that, if and when a congress member starts to fail his or her duties, it makes it easier for newly elected officials to take their spot as soon as possible. Resulting in a faster fix for the error that was in

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

    982 Words  | 4 Pages

    Is Gerrymandering a Controversial Topic? Gerrymandering is a process where the ruling political party uses the map of their state to draw lines that create voting districts in favor of their party. The result of this is that it doesn’t reflect the voters political views. For about 200 years the government has used gerrymandering during political elections and it continues to be used today (King, Elizabeth) .

    Read More

  • Gerrymandering Essay

    881 Words  | 4 Pages

    Most politicians are in favor of gerrymandering until the other political party is over the house. Many will say that there is nothing wrong with gerrymandering. Without quick eradication, gerrymandering will consume the government and the

    Read More

  • Essay On Divided Government

    503 Words  | 3 Pages

    Attempting to enact significant legislation requires Congress and the White House to compromise and anticipate what others will approve of and pass. When a bill successfully passes both houses of Congress, which has become increasingly difficult due to party polarization and radical groups within the House of Representatives and the Senate, it then goes to the president for signing. This is a lengthy process, and in order for groups of people with opposing views to settle in agreement on a measure, a great deal of negotiation is often required. This can result in a piece of legislation that is a compromised, diluted version of its original form that is not an effective solution to the initial problem. Vague, weak legislation often necessitates further action by the other two branches of government in order to interpret and execute it properly.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Congressional Gridlocks

Open Document