Corporal Punishment Should Be Allowed In Schools

Liam claims that they help with concentration but Principal Schwarts says that there is no evidence about fidget spinners helping with concentration, and are disruptive to others. Fidget spinners should not be allowed in classrooms because they distract other students, they can hurt kids, and there is no concrete evidence that they help with concentration. One reason that I believe that fidget spinners should not be allowed at school is because they are disruptive to other students. Quiet fidget spinners can even be distracting. Teachers can even get distracted by these toys.

We can save innocent lives and keep schools even safer if we make sure teachers remained unarmed. What sense does it make to try and make an attempt at lowering gun violence in schools we hand out guns to teachers? This is why teachers shouldn’t be allowed to carry

In the documentary “Waiting for Superman”, there are a lot of drawing methods, and the probability an applicant gets called is very small. All the principal see is a piece of folded paper, a coding number, a ball etc, not the background information sheet or appearance of the students. The drawing is conducted publicly in front of parents and kids to guarantee the fairness. Random picking really hurts unlucky kids` family since they don`t do anything wrong to not receive the opportunity they deserve. In fact, charter schools need to be expanded to serve all the kids who wish to attend charter school

Some stores are ceased to sell firearms and ammunition. The Columbine Massacre affected many people and school safety. Schools have started a better environment and better education. They made a better environment by putting policies and cameras in halls. Parents don’t have to worry anymore about school safety because of the new 4http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/04/20/columbine.school.safety/index.html 5http://knkx.org/post/how-school-security-has-changed-columbine-and-how-its-stayed-same6http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/04/20/columbine.school.safety/index.html 7https://sites.psu.edu/sjt5407/2016/08/25/hello-world/ the columbine massacre parents all around the

The really great thing is that if the school has staff that are carrying guns, it will hopefully intimidate and discourage shooters so the teachers don't even have to use the guns, making the school a much safer place. Think of the teachers who are injured in school shootings trying to say their students' lives. Whether those students are 5 or 20 it does not matter. Every person deserves the right to protect his or her self. In order to keep teachers in line, maybe do an even deeper background check before hiring them.

After this school shooting occurred many schools promoted a zero-tolerance policy for disruptive behavior and threats of violence from students. I agree with this policy because many shooters give out many signs before they actually perform their act. I believe they should not arm teachers with guns because then what is the difference between a teacher and the law enforcement. I think they should make sure that every classroom door is locked when it is shut, and it should be required for the door to be shut through the class period. Also, instead of giving teachers guns I think they should mount a fire extinguisher under their desk.

It has been shown by those who cherish their Second Amendment that the school walkouts are mostly due to two things; kids wanting to ditch class (who didn 't while growing up?) and the anti-gun lobby working to make it happen. It is rarely based on hardly any of the children really knowing anything about guns at all. Today, as New London kindergarteners show, this is clearly the case, as reported by NBC CT. "We love school! We love school," chanted the Connecticut students in a video posted on Facebook.

A month later these students and their parents sued the school district over violating the students’ right of expression. The court ruled in favor of the school, but when the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District reached the Supreme Court, the students and their families won in 1969. The First Amendment guaranteed the right of freedom of expression to students in public schools. If this expression caused a disruption to learning, the students could not continue. The armbands were not viewed as a distraction, so students were allowed to wear

“Now, 49 states require schools to have anti-bullying programs.” states and article titled “Stopping school bullying with orange T-shirts and a music video” (Chicago Tribune, adapted by Newsela staff on 09.20.13). State laws requiring schools to have anti-bullying programs prevents bullying because it stops schools from ignoring how big of an issue bullying is and promotes anti-bullying programs. Some schools have tried things to bring students together to stop bullying. The article mentioned above, showed one way it united students against bullying. Rogers Middle School students created a music video teaching respect.

When you ban a book you do not just take it away form your own kid but you take it away from everyone in school. Just because one person doesn’t want their child to read it doesn’t mean they have to ruin it for the rest of the school. The kids should have

The punishment serves as a reminder of those facts and helps students come to realize that cheating hinders your education. Later in life you will not be able to simply copy another person or look to the internet to answer all your problems. If you go down that route you run the risk of your employer firing you based on your inability to complete the assigned task. Pelton’s punishment was necessary because in a way it is similar to the consequences you might receive on a job later in life. Within the student handbook for the Piper School District it clearly specifies that the punishment for plagiarism will be an immediate zero on the given assignment.

This system may either be good or bad depending on the nature of society. If the society is good the system will aim to promote good moral values; if the society is bad the system will promote unethical practices. To many educators and parents, it’s common sense: children who have strong social and emotional skills perform better in school, have more positive relationships with peers and adults, and have more positive emotional adjustment and mental health. Because children spend a significant portion of their time in schools, schools are a major context for social and emotional development, growing along with and connected to academics. Conclusion Eliminating or minimizing bullying at Lakewood Elementary and placing the focus point on a more conclusive objective such as the point system will enrich these children with a sense of responsibility and amour-propae when it comes to behavior in school.