ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Deontological Ethics

1536 Words7 Pages

The distinction between right and wrong has been a matter of discussion for centuries, whether expressed through philosophical essays, social organisation or artistic creation. Deontological ethics is a philosophical theory which dissects acts into right and wrong on the basis of the adherence of an act to a specific rule. One of the many formulations of deontology is Kantianism, a view introduced by Immanuel Kant, which argues that the basis for morality are motives for one’s action rather than the consequences of it and searches a justification for one’s duty to behave in a certain manner. One of the critiques or counter positions of Kant’s ethics is Sartrean existentialism as it denies the possibility of an absolute moral system and focuses on the individual morality rather than social one and bases on one’s commitment to his chosen values. Yet drawing parallels between the two positions is far from impossible, despite Sartre’s strong opposition to Kantian moral theory. Kant’s moral philosophy stands on the notion of good will, an intrinsic good which is perceived to be so without qualification, independent of any external factors. Thus, he dismisses other values that could be taken as good in themselves, such as happiness, honesty, courage, trust etc. as they have worth only under specific conditions, whereas in others they could be transposed into bad acts. For example, trust is necessary for one to be able to manipulate others, one must have courage to be able to

Show More
Related

  • Deontology, Consequentialism, And Virtue Ethics

    1040 Words  | 5 Pages

    Ethical theories and principles provide the foundation for all ethical behavior.1There are three ethical laws, Deontology, Consequentialism, and Virtue ethics. These ethical theories, each emphasize different viewpoints on how to reach a resolution according to the guidelines defined within the theory itself. It important in every organization but more importantly in healthcare, because they act as a viewpoint on which guidance is obtained towards a decision. The term deontology comes from the Greek word deon, meaning duty.2 In Deontology, actions and outcomes are always judged independently of their outcome and the act itself determine its rightness if it upholds the rules that apply and not the outcome.

    Read More

  • Kant's Deontology: The Final Ethical Theory

    154 Words  | 1 Pages

    The final ethical theory is Kant’s deontology. Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who admire the stoics for their dedication to performing their duties and playing their part. He based his theory on duties, obligations, and rights. Its main focus is that everyone has an inherited right. It highlights the importance of respecting a person autonomy.

    Read More

  • Virtue Ethics Vs Deontology

    389 Words  | 2 Pages

    One example of a consequence for my decision would be complete and utter hatred towards me as an individual. Whether it’s through public persecution or social media, the level of severity could also render me jobless. In either case, an important note to make is that both of my options clearly value human life in a quantitative manner. Despite the major differences between virtue ethics and deontology, there are two similarities that connect them together.

    Read More

  • Ethical Theories Of Ethics: Utilitarian And Deontological Approaches

    563 Words  | 3 Pages

    When it comes to justifying what an individual perceives as moral, there are several different ethical theories that provide perspectives as to how situations are evaluated. These theories look at the consequences of the actions, what the agent’s intentions are, and whether the individual is being used as a means to end (May, 2014). Two of the founding theories of ethics are the utilitarian and deontological approaches which are demonstrated through the trolley scenario. While the best option would be to divert to a track with no one tied to it, a utilitarian would pull the switch to lead the trolley down the track to where there was only one person.

    Read More

  • Aristotle Vs Immanuel Kant

    1179 Words  | 5 Pages

    The topic of ethics has been a subject of debate for centuries, with different philosophers proposing various theories and principles to guide ethical decision making. Aristotle and Immanuel Kant are among the most influential philosophers in the field of ethics, each with a unique perspective on the nature of morality and what constitutes a good life. In this paper I will discuss the chosen topic of comparing the ethical theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each of these positions? Why?

    Read More

  • Two Ethical Theories Of Consequentialism And Deontology

    1256 Words  | 6 Pages

    In simple words, a moral theory is an effort at outlining what an individual ought to do in accord to an intrinsic good. It can take many aspects, each with it’s own strength and weaknesses, and each appealing in it’s own way. In this paper I will focus on two normative ethical theories, consequentialism and deontology. I will respectively describe each one, and will then proceed to list their corresponding benefits and shortcomings. I will conclude by siding with consequentialism for various reasons that I will try my best to explain.

    Read More

  • Jean-Paul Sartre's Ethics Of Ambiguity

    1391 Words  | 6 Pages

    Undoubtedly, these two individual’s will have different perspectives on life. However, there are guiding principles that every person should abide by. In this paper I will analyze Jean-Paul Sartre’s Bad Faith and Simone de Beauvoir’s Ethics of Ambiguity. I will come to the conclusion that everyone should follow two important guidelines. First, one must avoid living

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Deontology

    1202 Words  | 5 Pages

    Deontology which is derived from the Greek words Deon (meaning obligation/duty) and logia (science/study) combined to be also known as duty or rule-based ethics or the study of duties or obligations. It is a branch of ethical theories that deals with ethics of conduct, which theories are based on the sort of actions people must perform. It is based on non-consequentialism where the ends do not justify the means and thus deontology is an approach to ethics in which a sense of duty or principle prescribes the ethical decision (Preston, 2007). Deontology affirms duties must be obeyed regardless of the consequences. The theory of Deontology has its flaws as well and this essay will present three criticisms of deontology namely that deontology relies on moral absolutes, allows acts that make the world a worse place, two permissible duties that are right can conflict with each other and will demonstrate these flaws with relevant case studies and dilemmas.

    Read More

  • Comparing Deontology And Aristotle's Virtue Ethics

    723 Words  | 3 Pages

    John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, Immanuel Kant’s Deontology, and Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics all provide unique perspectives in answering moral dilemmas. In a specific instance, deciding whether or not succumbing to Body Identity Integrity Disorder is ethical, each aforementioned philosopher would use certain justifications from their respective theories to come to a conclusion. Kantian Deontology provides the best, most wholesome explanation in this case. Body Identity Integrity Disorder (BIID), as a brief summary, is an unofficially-recognized mental illness which causes its victims to feel incompatibility with a certain part of their body, e.g. men and women who feel the need to go blind, cut of a limb, etc. and impulsively try to do so,

    Read More

  • Philosopher Immanuel Kant And Radical Evil

    569 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kant argues that pursuing his version of radical good requires the cultivation of goodwill and solid moral philosophy. Kant believes humanity's basic inclination is towards evil and amoral philosophies, which he deems "radical evil. " For Kant, radical evil is not

    Read More

  • What Is Kant's Ethical Theory Too Inflexible?

    1284 Words  | 6 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's influence on Western philosophy cannot be overstated. His emphasis on reason, morality, and freedom resonated with many of his contemporaries and has continued to influence modern thought. In particular, his ethical theory, which centers on the concept of the Categorical Imperative, has been widely studied and debated. In the following sections, I will engage with this objection by exploring whether or not Kant's theory truly ignores individuality and if it is too inflexible in practice. Through a critical analysis of Kant's ethical theory and relevant scholarly literature, I will provide a cogent argument that either defends or supports the objection that Kant's theory is too rigid and inflexible.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Utilitarianism

    1228 Words  | 5 Pages

    Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two of the most notable philosophers in normative ethics. This branch of ethics is based on moral standards that determine what is considered morally right and wrong. This paper will focus on Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology and J.S. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism. While Mill takes a consequentialist approach, focused on the belief that actions are right if they are for the benefit of a majority, Kant is solely concerned with the nature of duty and obligation, regardless of the outcome. This paper will also reveal that Kantian ethics, in my opinion, is a better moral law to follow compared to the utilitarian position.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism Vs Deontology Analysis

    779 Words  | 4 Pages

    11 UTILITARISM TO DEONTOLOGY Sketch the main points in Smart 's version of utilitarianism. Compare with a deontological view of ethics and discuss deontological objections to utilitarianism. Number of words with footnotes: 3169 Utilitarism and deontology are two opposing ethical theories. On the one hand, J. J. C. Smart represents the utilitarian view of ethics, while on the other hand Charles Fried represents the deontological. Both point to fundamental features of their interpretations as well as some criticism of the other party.

    Read More

  • Kantian Ethics: Kant And Free Will

    1145 Words  | 5 Pages

    Kantian ethics, according to the Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals, revolve around a universal moral law called the categorical imperative. This principle relies not on our senses, but on reason alone. In Kant’s efforts to explore the ethics of human beings, he starts by describing ‘will’ as the only thing that can be unconditionally good. Will has to do with our intentions, and our intentions must be in line with our duties. To be good, one’s actions must accord with a good will.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant Categorical Imperative

    837 Words  | 4 Pages

    He says that the good person has a good will and that will is good not because of its effects, but because of its intention. What intention does the good will have? Kant tells us that our only motive for doing what is right should be simply because it is the right thing to do. We should act in accord with duty or the sake of it. This leads us back to the universal law formulation of the categorical imperative, which states that our actions should be universalized so that people can all benefit from each other.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Deontological Ethics

Open Document