The Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes

When a drone strikes a target, rockets soar down from the reaper drone and detonate when it comes in contact with the target. This explosion can send shrapnel in any direction causing damage surrounding buildings and people. This is what civilians are fearful for in these areas of conflict. These drones have killed about 2,562 - 3,325 people in pakistan and about 474 - 881 were civilians, according to TBJI reports from June 2004. Not only are there deaths from these attacks but also a large numbers of life threatening injuries that range from 1,228 - 1,362.

In 2002, the CIA began to arm drones with missiles to shoot suspected terrorists in Afghanistan and Iraq (Source A). However, even though drones bring a new way of warfare into America, much of the world disapprove the use of drones (Source G). In reality, drones benefit the country by how they provide more of a defensive approach to wars. Drone strikes can actually decimate terrorists networks which makes the United States safer altogether and secondly drones are more precise which indicate that they can take down a target and keep the people around the target safer.

(BS-3) Americans in Afghanistan have bombed many locations connected to the Taliban in hopes of creating peace but failed in Nusrat’s case. (BS-2) Innocent people in Afghanistan have been affected from American bombs, including Najmah. (BS-1) Americans ruined everything many Afghan people loved but seemed to think it is helping. (R) "’If the [U. S. ] base wasn't here, the Taliban wouldn't be attacking us,’ says Kamin Agha, a local truckdriver” (Moreau, Ron,

The criticism of the drone grows The debate on unmanned aircraft known as drones, have really taken off in the US in recent months. Now it 's not just the US military 's use abroad criticized, resistance grows even against the increasing use within its own borders. Unmanned aircraft, called drones, used by the US during the Vietnam War, but the last ten years, development has continued in the "war on terror". According to the American think tank the New America Foundation have up to 2 700 people have been killed in drone attacks in countries such as Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen since 2004.

So if plane hijackings have happened in past history, and passengers aren 't allowed to carry the guns on a plane, then why aren 't pilots allowed to carry a gun for the planes safety or at least have them in a secure box in the cockpit that can only be accessed in an emergency? In my opinion all commercial pilots should be armed to defend themselves if something should happen like a hijacking or like most recently an airline employee being killed.

Military Drones Used At All Costs? Military drones have been used by the United States in combat for several years now. These unmanned aircrafts are equipped with bombs and cameras and then flown from thousands of miles away, over targets pinpointed by intelligence organizations. Many people think that the use of drones is too much like a video game and takes from the reality of war itself. They also blame drone attacks for the deaths of many innocent people.

They have become a part of the world and become an involuntary fragment. The use of WMDs over the decade has even shifted from security to purely destruction. Most terrorist groups use WMDs as they possess political goals and have traditional, ethnic, nationalist, or ideological associations which make it necessary for them to use such weapons solely for the sake of destruction. These terrorist groups want to gain politically from their attacks and create terror in the minds of the people which may even not require the use of WMDs in certain cases like the WTC attack. These attacks just aggravate with the use of WMDs.

One report addresses that, “Drone strikes create more terrorists than they kill,” (Source K) while another remarks that, “according to author Jeremy Scahill, the vast majority of militants operating in Yemen today are “people who are aggrieved by attacks on their homes that forced them to go out and fight” (Source K). The criticism drones receive still does not match evidently the fact that drones are safer because they replace the militants risking their

Other communications from al Qaeda operatives confirm this as well. Dozens of highly skilled al Qaeda commanders, trainers, bomb makers and operatives have been taken off the battlefield. Plots have been disrupted that would have targeted international aviation, U.S. transit systems, European cities and our troops in Afghanistan. Simply put, these strikes have saved lives”. If that is not enough proof that drones have help the U.S. immensely in its war on terror then David Rohde’s, who was a prisoner of the Taliban, comment of how drones are a “terrifying presence” for militants along with the fact that Hakimullah mehsud, previous leader of the Taliban, was killed by a drone should be more than enough evidence that the drones are accomplishing their

Everyone has a Story Can one imagine a world where people undergo such insanity, that they willingly go on suicide plane missions? Neither could the United States before September 11, 2001. The 9/11 terrorists attacks, lead by an Islamic group al-Qaeda, devastated the country. This group so heavily believed in their religion, that they wanted to create an independent Muslim State. The tragic event of 9/11 impacted everyone in the United States, whether or not they were present at the terrorists site of attack.

Their attacks also differ from first and second class attackers because suicide bombers in the third class don’t use a “bomb” but instead use the energy of a vehicle such as a plane or a boat to wreak havoc. Most bombers who carry out these tasks are extreme and hardline fanatics who have no other objective than to kill as many people as possible. Although these events are rare, the destruction and lethality of these attacks is substantial. 9/11 is a primary example of a class three suicide attack in which multiple planes were used to cause unimaginable destruction (see Figure 2). Thousands of people die in these terror attacks, but the motivation behind such a terrible act is one of the last questions left

This leads to more problems like airports making bag checks more stricts or require a full body search for everyone which causes many people to become angry. Another big issue with the possible return of cold war tensions with russia is nuclear weapons. NATO does a good job in

ISIS is a dangerous group attacks nations and are formidable or bring fear to others. “(CNN) - The United Nations described a joint suicide bombing that killed 80 people in Afghanistan as a "war crime," saying those responsible for the attack on a peaceful demonstration will be held accountable. ISIS claimed responsibility for the bombing in the capital Saturday.” (Visser and Popalzai).

“The drone represents a steady advance in precision that has cut zeros off collateral-damage figures”____. So although the drone has not met the miracle expectations that were set for it; it is still the best option

This action goes against the human rights. Some even reported of drones entering their houses. The law states, “Under international human rights law, the targeted individual must pose an imminent threat that only lethal force can prevent. Simply being suspected of some connection to a "militant" organization — or, under the CIA 's policy of "signature" drone strikes, fitting the profile of a terrorist in an area where terrorists are known to operate – is not legally sufficient to make someone a permissible target for killing”.