Where do the Western Balkan countries stand concerning European integration?
This question coming after a prolonged period of engagement and expectation of Balkan countries to become EU members and facing the rising risks of Euro sceptics and Radicals, takes a special focus on public and political debates.
On May 9th of each year, besides marking the anniversary of Schuman's Historical Declaration is also a reminder to celebrate peace and unity in Europe. But even this May, more than 65 years after Schuman's declaration, Western Balkan countries are still awaiting accession to the European Union. Always a step forward but still not ready, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Kosovo seem to have a long journey towards full membership, because of a ban on a 5- Year extension of the enlargement process, stated by European Commission President Jean Claude Juncker.
The
…show more content…
Albania as a candidate country is still awaiting the opening of negotiations for EU membership. There does not appear to be any green light if the country does not meet all the criteria set by the European Commission when dealing with the fight against corruption and organized crime, administrative reform, judicial system reform, improvement of human rights and problems with press freedom and the media. Further progress on these five key priorities and notably on the implementation of recently adopted judicial reform legislation. After fulfilling the criteria and the sustainable progress, Montenegro opened its negotiations on the crucial rule of law chapters. Chapter 23 on judicial reform and fundamental rights and Chapter 24 on freedom, security and justice — were opened at an early stage in the negotiations, in December 2013. 26 out of a total of 35 negotiating chapters had been opened with Montenegro by the end of December
In the duration of WW1 and WW2, French speaking Canadians were against being conscripted because they felt that there was no point in Canada fighting European wars. Whereas English speaking Canadians supported conscription, mostly to help out Britain in the battles. There was a choice here to either side with the English and conscript people or to side with the French and not go through with it. Canada went through with conscription. This proved to French Canadians that the Canadian government would support the English population whenever there was any form of a debate.(Legare, 2017, 1).
The term "alien" has taken on a negative connotation over the last few years. With the issue of immigration reform so prevalent in the U.S., immigration-reform advocates are fighting to remove the term from federal documents so as not to offend immigrants. Castro leads the way Rep. Joaquín Castro, D-Texas, introduced a bill that would effectively remove the term "alien" in any and all federal documents and replace it with the more politically correct term "foreign national. " The name of the bill is the Correcting Hurtful and Alienating Names in Government Expression Act, also known as the CHANGE act.
One of the biggest controversies in the United States today is immigration. This is a huge topic in the country today because there is numerous people on both sides of the Comprehensive Immigration Reform that present great evidence about it. This reform is impacting millions of immigrants that are working and living in the Unites States today, but it also affects the people that are citizens of the United States. In this paper I am going to present arguments from both sides of the Comprehensive Immigration Reform, then come to a conclusion on which side I choose to place my opinion. There are a lot of worthy things that this reform is going to accomplish for immigrants in the United States.
The motivations of the European colonization were their greed to find new source of gold and used the new world as a dumping ground for convict and potentially dangerous lower classes. European came and brought diseases, which killed about 80 percent of the Indians. The Spanish arrived in the West Indies in 1492 caused the devastation if the Indians. They killed and enslaved the Indians and exploited the tribute in the form of gold taken from streams.
Blamed in part by the end of the Cold War, in part by Yugoslavia’s leaders, in part by Europe’s failure to deal with those leaders, and ultimately, by a total absence of American action that should have occurred in the vacuum created by European inaction. As the cold war ended, and with it Soviet influence, many Central and Eastern European countries started realigning themselves. Yugoslavia was no different. Catholic Slovenia was the first Yugoslav Republic to consider secession. The Albanians in Kosovo, tired of being ruled by the Serbs, were considering the same.
The Pros of Border Security Did you know that the undocumented population of the United States has reached eleven million or more people? Do you know the severities caused by this large undocumented population? The reason why the United States needs to advocate a strong border security system is because of the amount of drugs illegally smuggled into the country, the increase of terrorism and the fear of safety amongst Americans, and the decrease of the availability of jobs.
After the end of World War 1 in 1918, the US declared a policy of isolationism. Isolationism is a policy of non-involvement in other countries conflicts and politics and specifically for the US, non-involvement in European affairs. The US implemented this policy by denying the Treaty of Versailles in a vote of 39 to 55 in the Senate and consequently, did not join the League of Nations. This policy brought with it both positive and negative effects on the US. One positive effect is with isolation, the US can avoid the costs of dealing with conflicts in Europe and can avoid the negative effects on citizens.
In the land of the free and the home of the brave, it is important for us to remember how we achieved independence. The Treaty of Paris ended the war between America and Great Britain and recognized America 's independence and sovereignty. It was signed on September 3, 1783. The Treaty of Paris was signed by representatives of King George III from Great Britain and the United States in the city for which it was named, Paris, France. The Treaty of Paris was a significant compromise because it brought a formal conclusion to the American Revolution, recognized America 's Independence from the British monarchy, and outlined new borders for United States territory.
Traditionally the Balkans had been dominated by the Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, whom were each other’s rivals, and was inhabited by different ethnic groups known as Slavs. During the 19th century the influence of the Ottoman was in decline and the neighboring three Powers were all
In the contemporary society, there are an increasing number of people involved in the globalisation. I choose the topic of international trade. And in the following paragraphs, I am going to introduce what is international trade, other possible benefits of trading globally and the bottom line. (Heakal 2015) Thanks to the international trade that allows us to expand the market for goods and services.
The EU is a supranational organisation, in other words more than one country is involved in it and that it has greater authority than any single country within it. European governments that choose to be members of the EU make an important decision to give up some of their national sovereignty and to agree on policies in social, political and economic matters which are of common interest (Perisic, 2010:2). In other words, member states’ national policies and laws are equally bound by the EU institutions, norms and regulations. Some member states seem to be better integrated than others.
Trump announce that USA left Paris agreement The Paris treaty is an agreement whereby countries commit to reducing their greenhouse gas emissions through measures such as the use of less coal and oil, using renewable energy such as wind, solar panels and cells of hydrogen. All this with the intention of reducing the global temperature and fighting against climate change. It is also considered to be the greatest environmental achievement in history because of its global reach and long-term objectives. If countries do not act now, the temperature can increase to 4.5 degrees Celsius by the year 2100, but with the promises of the Paris Treaty the temperature could increase only to 2.7 degrees Celsius, This would be very beneficial to the planet.
The exceptionality of Europe is not only questioned, but defied, invalidated, on a geopolitical level as much as a more substantial, cultural
He writes “Indeed, the transition from communism to democracy in Eastern Europe is marked by a direct use of nationalism as the source of the political legitimacy of regimes, … And if nationalism is the technology of rule in a society dominated by politics, … it is obvious that in such societies it is easy to produce … conflicts on a long-term basis” (Antonic, 478). The article points to the idea that when the ability of the elites to maintain control of the state through its institutions breaks down, nationalism becomes the tool of choice to hold on to power, not just in Yugoslavia but regionally. The severe gridlock that plagued the republics made even having a discussion about something as fundamental as the constitutional underpinnings and relationships in the state almost impossible to have, breaking down institutions, encouraging nationalism, and leaving behind a situation ripe for
.5 MAASTRICHT TREATY The Maastricht Treaty, marked in 1992 and authoritatively known as the Treaty on European Union (TEU), presented a few imperative increments and alterations to the Treaty of Rome and flagged a progress in European combination rose to just by the 1986 Single European Act. Its focal elements were the consolidation of EMU into the Treaty of Rome and the foundation of the European Union by the expansion of two new fields of approach co-operation: the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and Justice and Home Affairs (JHA). These new zones were figured as intergovernmental commitments, instead of obligations of the Community 's supranational affiliations, a game-plan which was to a confined degree balanced in this way in the 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam, where the Community was given to a more prominent degree a section in giving methodology rules and certain parts of JHA were traded to go under the expertise of the Commission and the Court of Justice.