The Pros And Cons Of Existentialism

Although the Force can have some characteristics in common with the Holy Spirit, nothing and no one can ever compare to Him. Others state that “the Force is not a personal God to whom one prays, it is not omnibenevolent or ‘all good’. There is a ‘dark side’ to the force, it is not just for good guys., bad guys use it and apparently use it more powerfully than the good guys” (Marshall, 2014). The Holy Spirit is for everyone, not just a select few; it is a relationship rather than a gift. “According to the Merriam- Webster Dictionary, religion is typically defined in three ways; the belief in a god or a group of gods, an organized system of beliefs, ceremonies, and rules used to worship a god or a group of gods, and an interest, a belief, or an activity that is very important to a person of group” (Asher-Perrin, 2014).

Turn of The Screw The supernatural elements in Turn of The Screw are important because they bring an element of ambiguity to the story. Given the very inconclusive evidence, it could be argued that there are ghosts. Alternatively, it is equally possible that they are completely a figment of the governess’ imagination. The governess wholeheartedly claims she sees the ghosts, but no other characters ever claim the same thing. But since the reader only gets insight from the point of view of the governess, we can’t see what the others are thinking and whether or not they are being completely truthful.

Most importantly, it is important to understand the concept of existentialism and what does it state. Existentialism is a philosophical idea concerned with our individual freedom and choice. We are free to choose and to determine our own fate and destiny. However, with such power comes great responsibility. Because we are free to act by will, we are also responsible for the consequences that follow those choices.

This can lead to some discord and animosity, such as brawls, intense arguments, and in some cases war. One may call me fatuous for making these points, because one may think I agree to the existence of good and evil because I stated it is artificial. Well, be prepared to be debunked, as when one references good and evil, they use no scientific evidence of its existence. It’s typically based off of one’s moral compass, law, and literature, but is never genuinely based on a highly accredited scientific source. However, one may argue that you can use people with mental issues who do crimes are evil.

We must be able to use knowledge to question judgement. A question many people would ask that does not have empirical evidence to prove tends to be if God exists? There is no empirical evidence whether god exists, inductive reasoning and intuition strongly oppose each other at this point because deductive reasoning would ask for evidence to suggest that God exists however my intuition would say that God does exist through personal experiences. CREATIONISM: However the big bang could be argued because monotheists believe that a higher being is only possible to create such an event. By using inductive reasoning, solid evidence can eliminate any sense of doubts.

A true nihilist would believe in nothing, have no loyalties, and no purpose other than, perhaps, an impulse to destroy. While few philosophers would claim to be nihilists, nihilism is most often associated with Friedrich Nietzsche who argued that its corrosive effects would eventually destroy all moral, religious, and metaphysical convictions and precipitate the greatest crisis in human history. Nietzsche also believes that the world has no values since there is nothing in it which might sensibly be supposed to have value. Simply put, nihilism for him has to do with the fact that all the highest values lose all its value. This implies that there is no justification whatsoever for assuming that there is

5. The first one would be giving serious attention in assessing and articulate our own values. Knowing what is your own stand and principles are the points which Gioia wish to bring out in the context. People should consciously decide what is his own values and if his doesn’t then it is inevitable that people would be likely to decide for them and influence him to accept the culture. The second would be recognizing his own cognitive structure and confront their own values as this would be vital in getting the core or even the key information.

In the case of humans it was originally perceived that we are born with an essence or purpose in life, but existentialist denied it and came out with their own version that everyone is born without any essence. It is for us to discover our own purpose as we evolve in our life. This is the basic principle to existentialism and hence they came out with their own manta as “existence

The will-to-power harmonizes with Nietzsche’s interpretation of the world as becoming, in that it understands concepts and values as having histories of meanings. The meaning of a concept is unstable, and subject to the struggle of dominance between competing interpretations. The imposing of meaning and value on the world is fundamental activity of humans, and Nietzsche understands one’s valuing to be determined by the will-to-power. Thus, anti-natural morality (as well as Nietzsche’s philosophy) is understood to be a product of life’s competing drives. “Life itself forces us to posit values; life itself values through us when we posit values.”

Interpretivism does not accept a single idea of reality, but accepts multiple ideas which stand to the participant’s point of view. Interpretative research aims to find out how the understanding of the everyday’s reality of each individual is kept and produced through one’s experiences. Therefore Interpretivism focuses on finding out how people make their own meanings of their experiences lived in their own environment (Braithwaite & Schrodt,

States could simply ignore certain laws without any repercussions. Citizens also lacked the ability to file cases against the national government, because there was no court system in place for a lawsuit. One major difference in the Articles of Confederation and its successor-The Constitution of the United States-was its lack of a chief executive. Without a chief executive the United States was left without a presidential figure to handle foreign affairs. The United States even received complaints from nations such as Britain, because they lacked the knowledge of whom to contact in order to initiate diplomacy.

None of them know what it is to truly be free because they are only the Council’s version of free. No one in this society is allowed to be what they want in life. They aren’t allowed to have goals.

In summary, each individual holds onto a certain perception of the world. Whether it focuses on personal morals or blind fate. Chigurh and Bell embody these opposing theories through their actions in the novel. Actions that they believe are the right thing to do. Needless to say, we will never determine if these views are wrong or

Every culture in the universal has their own beliefs and behaviors that assumed to be natural, normal, and the best. This is called Ethnocentrism. When Ethnocentrism is too much it prevents us to understand other cultures. Miner’s explained Ethnocentrism in his “Body Ritual Among the Nacirema” article. According to him, Nacirema people’s beliefs are widely based on magic and lots of the practices are actually demeaning to their well-being.

Waking hypnosis produces what is known as light trance.Deep trance is used to hypnotize people for medical purposes such as pain relief. Covert hypnosis doesn 't worry about putting people into deep trances because this is not a realistic way to persuade people. Waking hypnosis enables you to use both verbal and non verbal suggestions. The reason why I have brought up the power of suggestion is because this is precisely how hypnosis creates transformations in people 's behavior. Hypnosis is the science that gives you the resources to efficiently plant suggestions and ideas in people 's minds without anyone knowing what you are doing.