The Pros And Cons Of Extrajudicial Killing

802 Words4 Pages
The so-called extrajudicial killings are forbidden to be narcotics. First, it is forbidden. Second, it is narcotics. They can also say that they are not justified, We, can say that it is only right for them, that in that way they will be released, but if you kill for no reason are you going tell someone? If, you walk in front of your loved ones would you be happy? If you are one of those victims who have been murdered for no reason, you can still cooperate with our president. There are so many steps you can take and many reasons will allow you to put an end to "war on drugs" if you can be a victim? His promise was apparent. The aim is to deceive. The offer: move you away from the truth - lower your torment, soften the pain you feel,…show more content…
It is an invitation to deceive and impede ourselves, to follow false reasoning and toddlers, insisting that the addicts should die, insisting that they do not need a thorough process because they have just started things that should not be. That if the killings of "drug users and drug pusher" will certainly be addressed by mercenary police and abusive guards. With the mistakes and the burdens of the lives of those who are just bad, it's okay because, the "war on drugs" that the president will enforce is good but the truth is that we just believe that people who are guilty will never change, those people with bad consciences do not need to…show more content…
But in the anti-crime campaign, the number of killers especially the sudden rise of fighters even though they are already handcuffed and have two opposing fruits. In the first place, the sheriffs run and run. But on the other hand, the citizens only remember why they cannot trust the police. Are not they the ones who were the leading drug traffickers nationwide, are they not even guilty of why every drug transaction in the Philippines continues to come in. But until now we are still confident in the police who are killing their former
Open Document