This debate has been talked about, and thrown around for a long time now. The two sides to this debate have been arguing for a long time now, with different points coming up all the time. Why do the people arguing for democracy, say that it is a better system, than a monarchy? First off, democracy makes sure that people retain some power, and know what is going on in their government. Secondly, democracy makes sure that not only one person, gets all the power, unlike in a monarchy.
The Geniocracy and democratic republic are two different systems that both have different values, we should work on the democratic republic to help create a way where everyone is equal and civilized and also to use common sense. Common sense means a lot in this modern era, because many people are causing crimes than can easily be punished for but are not being punished for what they have done probably based on their gender or race. This system works better than every other system there is because, they do everything based on intelligence and common sense. Other systems might be good but they are not as good as
Democracy is a system of government, people choose political leaders through elections which are held on a regular basis. Every citizen over a certain age is allowed the vote ; regardless of gender and social status. Socrates argued not everyone should be allowed to vote “ Democracy should not include every member of society due to lack of education”. Democracy “is the government of the people, by the people,for the people”.The elections are conducted free and fairly on regular basis, it relies on citizen participation, it is a platform to voice opinions and debate without violence. Political participation in democracy must be peaceful, respect the law and tolerant towards individual views.
Democracy has long been considered by the modern society as one of the universal values and it has been used as a legitimate decision making method. According to Habermas in Three Normative Models of Democracy (Habermas, 1994), democracy is the institutionalization of the public use of reason jointly exercised by autonomous citizens. Deliberation needs to be freed of power imbalances in order to reach normative consensus based on rationality and equal participation. It is claimed that the goal of deliberate democracy is to achieve a just social order whereas a just social order is the social order which each individual and institution is constrained from committing unjust acts. This essay will argue that, in fact deliberate democracy is not a necessary condition for a just social order.
Modern day democracies are bedeviled by the excesses of the politicians and political wheeler dealers who use it to accumulate wealth and acquire power hence disenfranchising the voters. This is a sure recipe for anarchy in the society. The notion that winning the election entitles the majority to do whatever it pleases has been the bane of many a democratic experiment. A recent example is the Egyptian case where Mr Morsi on taking power treated democracy as a winner takes all situation, thereby granting himself unlimited powers and packing the Egyptian upper house with a permanent islamist majority. To avoid the chaos occasioned by democratic transitions, it’s essential to put limits to the powers of the majority and also provide guarantees for individual
Stewart furthermore explains how the concept of democracy is misinterpreted through mistrust. Today, in countless countries, the amount of mistrust among the public towards government is at an all-time high which is one of the biggest threats towards a flourishing democracy. It is thus profoundly necessary to rebuild the trust between the public and the politicians for the democracy in place to become vibrant and vigorous once again. This argument is supported by Bulgarian political scientist Ivan Krastev
History indicates that war was mainly conducted by undemocratic countries. Furthermore, democracies always justify themselves for going to war and liberally for the reason to defend the freedom state and society. Secondly, Kant liberal republicanism must be spread universally in order to achieve perpetual peace among states. This will result in states having similar attributes hence decrease the possibility of war between democracies. Finally, in international arena, perception of others is important and will influence decision making of a state.
Democracy is a system of government in which every citizen in the country can vote to elect its government officials. Rober Dahl argues that an ideal democracy is consisted of two factors: political participation and political contestation (Dahl, 1991) . Political participation demonstrates that all the citizens who are eligible to vote have to have a right to vote to reflect their political requests to the real politics. The election have to be a transparent and accountable one. Also, after the election, power have to be given to the successful candidates.
However, this is tied directly to the fundamental understanding of democracy in that citizens have the power to influence their sovereign through becoming the sovereign (through majority decisions). Democracy is good. Democracy is bad whenever the majority abuses its freedoms to serve individual desire. In other words, the characteristics of a democracy are solely dependent on its citizens and there might be more of a convincing reason to believe that both Plato and Aristotle’s criticisms are a result of human nature, instead of democracy itself. IV.
Democracy is a political system which, at its core, enshrines the public sovereignty through the representative mechanism. In democracy, political representation by popular vote is a source of the political legitimacy on which the government practice the state power. As always, we have learnt about “power tends to corrupt, absolute power corrupts absolutely” , say Lord Acton , we , in democracies , need to set up control mechanism over usage of power . On the other hand, the government can do nothing for the people without having considerable powers such as taxation, law makings, law enforcement and probing social and political issues and the likes . In concept of Democracy, the power must be limited and put under “check and balance” mechanism.