The Pros And Cons Of Facade Democracy

1192 Words5 Pages
Nowadays, democracy is unfortunately seen as inevitable; in other words, it is the political system no one dares to question and even less making it publicly. According to several experts, this is an unfortunate fact for two main reasons. First, this practice limits our imagination. When considering other alternatives is almost forbidden, we do not think about them, and what is worst, we will not see or find them even if they are right in front of our eyes. Second, because even if democracy can be considered as the best political system, to become it in a dead dogma and not see it just an option will weaken it. Perhaps, it is even more disturbing the way democracy can be imported and imposed as a facade when the mentality remains averse to it.

What is Facade Democracy?
As several especialized sources explain, facade democracy implies a political system where although electoral institutions exist, they actaully do not represent a significant force for power; in other words, these are systems where democratic rules simply serve to legitimate an existing autocratic leadership. As experts put it, this is precisely a result of seeing democracy as inevitable; therefore, it has been established as a political system in different countries and people lacking a democratic mindset have been force to accept democratic rules beyond their control.

As experts explain, this causes some kind of schizophrenic behaviours. For example, imagine that you are member of the legislative body of
Open Document