Even though the application of the energy source as a alternative is a affordable, establishing a plant for it would require a high initial cost and would also take up to 5-10 years, along with this, the safety measures that need to be utilized inside the plants would be very expensive ("Disadvantages of Nuclear"). To build the complex technologies that are needed and the extreme safety measures that must be built, would require a staggering amount of money, for it to be built and also for the factories to run effectively. If the safety measures aren’t taken strictly then just accidents like the two major nuclear catastrophes at Chernobyl and Fukushima will repeat itself ("Advantages & Disadvantages of Nuclear"). As nuclear reactors cannot explode like nuclear bombs, as that would require a mix of 90% highly reactive fuel vs about 4-5% of highly reactive furl for nuclear power, which can melt down if the safety measures are not properly carried out, with some highly disastrous consequences ("Advantages & Disadvantages of Nuclear"). The radiation from Chernobyl incident extended as far a Sweden and Italy resulting in thousands of cancer cases to arise in those areas.
These resources are depleting; some sources believe that an energy crisis is to ensue. The energy crisis itself is in question as some scientist don’t believe it will happen and others believe it will. Most scientists do agree however that some form of energies should be replaced as it is dirty and the cost of production of things like coal and oil will increase as it may become harder to find, or harder to mine. Not all energy is considered clean energy, there are multiple problems with burning resources like pollution and its effect on the environment and the areas around the plants or mining operations. The idea of some of the nonrenewable resources depleting imposes a question of how to sustain the current amount of energy needed to run everything that’s dependent upon electricity.
List of Cons of Hydrogen Fuel Cells 1. They are extremely expensive. Initially, hydrogen fuel cells are extremely expensive to manufacture. However, just like other new technologies, their costs would come down to price levels that are affordable by normal consumers with mass production. Now, we are in a transition period, where many fuel cell manufacturers are investing literally hundreds of millions of dollars in gearing up for mass manufacturing and, at the same time, trying to develop a variety of markets for such products.
It is predicted that in this century we will deplete all of our fossil fuels, which we heavily rely on today. One of the main reasons that people are not acting on creating more green energy is that they simply do not have a clear understanding of the effects of using nonrenewable resources. Many schools don't teach about anything in the area of climate change, fossil fuels or the ways that the world is changing because of them. Many people also don’t know that we are running out of these resources, and extremely
In the world today, there is a constant debate on what to do about the growing issue of global warming. Ultimately, the issue can be correlated with the production of energy using nonrenewable resources, fossil fuels. Countless companies have made an effort to make the world ‘cleaner’, by using innovative and contemporary processes of creating energy. Energy sources have sprouted up in morals of creating energy efficiently and does not provide any harmful effects on the environment. One of these various sources of new energy is Nuclear Energy.
In addition, the National Resources Defense Council claims that high startup costs and planning time make nuclear power uneconomical. For example, the recovery time for nuclear reactors that cost $2.5 billion to $4.0 billion typically would require 25 to 40 years (National Resources Defense Council, 2013). As a result of the long return period, investing billions of dollars on nuclear power is precarious. Furthermore, investing money in other alternative energies sources are worthy because the potential growth is better compared to nuclear power. The potential growth of wind power in the next decade is twice the growth of nuclear
For example, some disadvantages of the Hadron Collider do relate to the global factor economical. It relates to it as the Hadron Collider is incredibly expensive to construct and be able to maintain. The LHC also uses hundred thousands of dollars for only electricity per day and takes up an immense amount of space. To be able to power the LHC to make it work a large supply of liquid helium is needed to be able to cool the magnets so that they become superconducting. Since the LHC has helped with new technology, its technology can be used to make new weapons worse than atomic bombs that can result in a lot of damage.
Over these few decades, fossil fuel reserves are depleting in a fast rate due to continue usage and the rising price of crude oil have triggered the energy crisis all over the world. However, in order to overcome this problem, biomass which is derived from renewable materials has become a new alternative of fuel to replace the traditional fossil fuels. Biodiesel or fatty acid methyl ester (FAMEs) which is derived from vegetables oil or animal fats is considered one of the best biomass-fuel to replace fossil fuel. Biodiesel is a renewable energy, lack aromatic compounds, highly biodegradable, and also has low SOx emission (Nyoman Puspa Asri, 2012). Biodiesel has gained the attention internationally as an alternative fuel since it is highly
From the lights in the streets to the computers we use at home. It is commonly known throughout human history that the energy used is burned from coal which creates biomass. During the Industrial Revolution, coal was an essential need to everyone, hence the discovery of oil as a substitute. Yet, the mass formation from the unearthing of oil causes more damage than benefits for the planet. Humanity had never seen a more compatible source in which came a higher demand for oil.
In Reagan era, gas production soar, where in Carters, gas production decline. The environmental and energy crisis of the 1970s did lead to the decline in the United States. Americans dependence on domestic and foreign oil correlated to oil being limited and not always, readily available. Although, there were many alternative solutions to petroleum, for instance nuclear plants and coals, the results were not favorable. The environmental and energy crisis of the 1970s still constrained the United States today with more smog, landfill waste, and gas prices risen and
Without fracking, the price of gas would have a drastic raise from $3.25 to $11 per gallon, so consumers would have to pay about $130 or more to refill their gas tank. Fracking has a bad reputation of polluting the environment that we live in. The government should allow hydraulic fracking to continue only if fracking companies agree to the following. Transporting fuel from foreign countries require a lot of money, the government should spend the money on better things like paying people to work of public projects. David Morris, PhD, Vice President of the institute for Local Self-Reliance states that the expenditures for our transportation fleets are about hundreds of billions of dollars.