Hence, human genetic modification can be applied to criminal and handicap persons and aid there better adaptation in the society. Moreover, when it comes to more modern application such as agriculture, Genetic Engineering is hailed as a blessing. Certainly, G.E. has the capacity the improve crops and animals by providing diseases resistance thus stopping the use of fertilizers and pesticides which contributes to a healthier environment. Indeed G.E.
Ethical Reasoning (Con) On the flip side, those who are anti-GMO argue that genetically modified crops such as corn and soybeans are causing harm to the environment around them. Corn, soybeans, and alfalfa are all genetically modified to resist certain pests and other dangers. “The GM version of field corn protects the crop against corn rootworms and the Asian corn borer” ( What Foods are…). The GM soybean plant is resistant to pests and disease as well as tolerant of herbicides that are most effective, allowing for less herbicides use overall. Along with this, alfalfa is genetically engineered with herbicides that reduce weeds and protect against smaller pests.
Plants and animals that have been genetically modified can become more resistant to the unexpected problems of disease. The beneficiaries have also been the agrochemical industry (pesticides, including insecticides, herbicides, fungicides and nematicides), large petrochemical companies (BASF, Dow Chemical, and ExxonMobil), manufacturers of agricultural machinery, dam builders, and large landowners. As stated by PG Economics, “The insect resistant (IR) technology used in cotton and corn has consistently delivered yield gains from reduced pest damage.” Pest control is very important to GMO farming and benefits the value of the crops. For others, the idea of GMO farming is a bad one because it leads to reduced genetic diversity, increased vulnerability to pests, soil erosion, water shortages, reduced soil fertility, micronutrient deficiencies, soil contamination, reduced availability of nutritious food crops for the local population, the displacement of vast numbers of small farmers from their land, rural impoverishment, and increased tensions and conflicts. Also, many of the farmers that use GMO for agricultural production do not follow all of the standards.
They use spray pesticides from natural sources to keep pests and diseases away. Animals are fed organic feed, and have access to go outdoors. Organic farming is known to be more civilized. To keep the animals from sickness, preventive measures are used. According to a State of Science Review done in 2008, organic food is more nutritious than inorganic as there are no chemicals or additives going into your body.
As such, they do not attract pests, and that eliminates the requirement for the use of pesticides. This can also reduce the risk of infection from viruses, so it could be included in the technical aspect of a solution, discussed above. However, making crops non-target organisms does also present a major environmental cost, one of the controversies surrounding GMOs. As non-target organisms, they do not attract insects., This also applies to insects, which play a vital role in the pollination of
This is actually a useful idea because it encourages farmers to contribute to ecosystems and biodiversity which are vital for food security and nutrition . A third way is to tax pollution or waste . This is a useful policy that will allow consumers in the west who throw out a huge amount of the food to become more efficient . But while such approaches may sound beneficial , they might result in
breve, Bi. longum are probiotic strains, which could be used for the fortification of fermented fruit and vegetable products (Table 6). Shelf-life of probiotic strains in fermented fruits and vegetables could be improved by encapsulation technology. However, further studies are needed to show the efficacy and the long-term safety of these applications used in probiotic formulations (Prakash et al.
They are living organisms and do require certain things, like water and sunlight, to be kept alive. This means that we should treat plants with a certain amount of respect such as not cutting them all down or destroying environments for our benefit because plants are living and do benefit us in ways such as keeping animals alive and providing the world with
● What are the pros and cons to genetic engineering?Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering. Manipulationof genes in natural organisms, such as plants, animals, and even humans, is considered genetic engineering. This is done using a variety of different techniques like molecular cloning. ● Does selective breeding help or hinder resistance against diseases in animals/organisms? In plants?