In recent years, testing of genetic material for disability or disease of an individual or their offspring has tremendously expanded knowledge for present and future disorders. The medical test of genetic screening is an examination of a population, identifying certain genotypes which display association with disease or susceptibility to disease, influence disease in descendants or fabricate other variations not known to be connected with disease (National Academy of Sciences, 1975). Some examples of the different types of genetic testing available include newborn screening, diagnostic testing, carrier testing, prenatal testing and forensic testing (Gehlert & Browne, 2006). Over the past couple of decades, there have been ongoing discussions on whether or not genetic screening should be encouraged, as testing presents limitations as well as benefits. Whilst the decision about whether to be screened should remain voluntary, as it is personal and complex, genetic screening should be ubiquitously endorsed and educated upon as it presents an improvement of the quality of life for those who are found to suffer a disease or disability and provides scientists and medical professionals with an …show more content…
There is a strong need of patient understanding, consent and respect for confidentiality, especially if a genetic test on an affected patient is being performed. Ultimately, the decision to be tested should be the decision of the individual, autonomously, and in the case of an unborn child or an infant who has no maturity the final decision should solely be up to the parents or legal guardians, taking to consideration advice from health professionals (National Health and Medical Research Council [NHMRC], 2010). If an individual should go ahead with a screening, there should be a strict confidentiality whereby the privacy of the patient should be protected by the health
Copeland’s purpose to inform, as well as engage or entertain, is developed through the structure of the article. Specifically, the structure of Copeland’s article consists of a personal story and other examples, along with statistical data. Copeland wants her readers to understand how DNA testing can be an emotional process, having positive outcomes for many families and yet also causing potential burdens for
Through DNA testing we can now see which diseases we will likely pass down to our children. Although this ability can be life-saving in the aspect it can be used to prevent diseases in children, it also can affect the parents’ desires
However, the lack of informed consent has raised ethical concerns and led to the establishment of guidelines for obtaining consent in medical research. Today health care providers have a responsibility to obtain informed consent from patients before conducting any medical
Joan had genetic testing that revealed a risk of heredity breast/ovarian cancer. Joan and her sister are estranged and Joan does not want to disclose the results to her sister. Joan’s sister carries a high risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer (Lea, 2008). Healthcare workers are faced with the dilemma to notify her sister of the results or to protect Joan’s privacy. Ethically the results should be reported to her sister due to it could reduce her risk of developing cancer or can ensure early detection.
Gaining consent is essential in healthcare practice because it is a legal and ethical value (Welsh Assembly Government [WAG], 2015). Obtaining consent is an ethical requirement because it enables respect for the patient’s autonomy as it includes them in part of the decision-making process (McHale, 2013a). Valid consent must be gained before any action on the capable patient regarding treatment, personal care or investigation (Tidy, 2016). The National Health Service [NHS], 2016) outlines consent as permission given by the patient to the clinician before receiving any medical investigation irrespective of the technique type. Taylor (2013), agrees and adds that consent is a patient’s right to make informed choices regarding their care and treatment.
1) The universal screening helps identify those at risk for reading disabilities and it involves the whole school. It is typically done three times throughout the whole school year. It assesses skills such as fluency in oral reading, phoneme segmentation and letter reading. The results are organized for discussion by school professionals, the scores are calculated for the students risk level determined by predetermined norms.
DNA was the only thing that contributed to a little girl's death one friday night, when she collapsed from a heart attack suddenly. The doctor said it was simply in her genes, but what does that really mean? Certain mutations and differences can transpire in someone's genes which causes particular genetic diseases and variances to occur. By taking samples of a person's DNA, which is what our genes consist of, doctors can determine mutations in genes that can impact specific traits and illnesses. While this is very intriguing to me, I wanted to understand how accurate genetic testing is, and how it affects people's everyday lives.
After reading the articles,”Why We Should Think Twice About Giving Genetic Tests to Our Kids” ,by Michael White, and “Genetic Testing for Kids:Is It a Good Idea?”, by Bonnie Rochman, parents should not give these tests to their children. If the children did take the test the result would outway the benefits, they would have anxiety, and the testing doesn’t always work. One main reason that a child should not the test is ,they could have anxiety for the rest of their lives. If a child took the genetic test they could learn they have a deadly disease they don’t know about yet.
Whole genome sequences show every gene and chromosome contained within the fetus. This will allow parents to see everything that makes up the DNA of the child and even with the possibility of ¨what will happen during the teenage and adult years¨ (Shurkin 1). Every parent has the idea of their dream child, what happens when whole genome sequencing shows that their future baby is not what they expect? As one article written by Joel Shurkin suggests that prenatal genetic test results might lead to parents raising their child differently, genetic manipulation, or even abortion if they are not pleased with the results. These options are rather common, with the rate of abortion ¨around 85% for Down Syndrome¨ (Press 74).
Letting insurance companies have access to these results gives them a better chance to determine the cost of one’s health insurance. Insurance companies have the right to differentiate premiums on the level of risk each applicant has (Morris, 2010). Having access to genetic testing allows them to be much more fair, as most of the time, insurance companies have to look at family history. This can be skewed, because your family members having a genetic disorder doesn’t automatically make you have it, even if most of your family members get it. This can cause someone who doesn’t have a genetic disorder having to pay more because their family has a history of a certain genetic disorder.
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis is a technique used to detect genetic diseases or chromosomal abnormalities in early human embryos. PGD is ethically controversial because it the screening involves the termination of embryos based on their expected genetic makeup. Furthermore, it is controversial whether where the line is drawn between PGD for medical uses and non-medical uses. For example, it is used to detect cancer causing genes or precursors for Alzheimer's disease. Non-medical uses would be to detect intelligence, height, and gender selection.
Embryos created using in vitro fertilization, which is the fertilization of an egg in an artificial environment, can be tested for specific genetic diseases before they are implanted in a mother’s uterus. This test is called Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and can be very useful as it is the least unethical of all the tests available prior to the birth of a baby. In this technique, multiple eggs are matured and divide until the 6-8 cell stage, at which point some of the cells are extracted and tested for genetic damage. Although this technique is extremely accurate, even a test that shows a healthy DNA does not ensure that the baby will be born healthy. Additionally, it is possible that all of the embryos that are tested carry the genetic disease.
1. Did you effectively research and debate your topic? Why or why not? Yes, I do believe that I effectively researched and debated my topic on mandatory genetic testing for athletes.
Many people every year are charged with crimes they didn’t commit, whether they pleaded guilty or eye-witnesses claimed and testified in court that the defendant committed the crime. Before DNA testing in 1989, there was an error rate of 6% and now that rate has dropped tremendously because we focus less on the stories witnesses claim to be true and focus more on hard evidence. Between 1989 and 2003, there was estimated to be 340 people wrongly convicted and over the years investigators found that 4,000 people were convicted for crimes they did not commit.
According to Merriam Webster, Genetic testing, also known as DNA testing, allows the genetic diagnosis of vulnerabilities to inherited diseases, and can also be used to determine a child's parentage (genetic mother and father) or in general a person's ancestry or biological relationship between people. Now, with Genetic Diagnosis, comes a very controversial topic, also known as, preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, which simply involves checking the genes of embryos created through IVF (In vitro fertilization) to allow a specific inherited disease or condition in the family to be withheld from passing it on in their offspring’s. A number of families have DNA that contributes to problematic health issues.