As a way to access one’s genetic information, genetic testing has been an option for those who desired to utilize the information to predict, assess, and evaluate the likelihood of their susceptibility to a disease or even gain knowledge of their ancestry. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (also known as DTC), provided by companies like 23 and Me, has made the service more accessible. With its prevalence in the realm of genetic testing, the lack of federal protection regarding direct access to testing results in DTC testing has become a primary issue. Along with direct access, the lack of a law regarding the requirement of a medical professional or a genetic counselor in genetic testing has also added concerns to the viability of DTC genetic testing. As such, while it is paramount that patients and consumers are guaranteed direct access to their genetic information, medical professionals or genetic counselors should be …show more content…
Even so, the absence of a medical professional may result in a misguided understanding of the results as the tested disease may be caused by other factors as well (i.e. choice of lifestyle). Take breast cancer: the risk of breast cancer not only involves genetics but also involves lack of physical activity and consumption of oral contraceptives and alcohol (CDC, 2017). Though it may provide references that other factors may influence results, DTC testing results alone may not always reflect the lifestyle of an individual. Especially with tests like the BRCA gene test, which are specific towards the identification of mutations in the BRCA genes known cause breast cancer, results may not reflect other factors such as one’s lifestyle. The addition of a professional in interpreting the results of the testing adds the cofactor of lifestyle into the equation, helping with a more accurate evaluation of the
Ethical Considerations in Genetics and Genomics Ethical duties of genetic testing is a challenge among healthcare workers. Ethical dilemmas are created due to situations resulting from genetic testing. Ethical dilemmas is created when genetic testing reveals vital information to a patient and the patient refuses to disclose information to family members that can be affected. Healthcare workers are to protect the privacy of patient’s health records according to the Health Insurance Probability and Accountability Act (HIPPA)
After reading the articles,”Why We Should Think Twice About Giving Genetic Tests to Our Kids” ,by Michael White, and “Genetic Testing for Kids:Is It a Good Idea?”, by Bonnie Rochman, parents should not give these tests to their children. If the children did take the test the result would outway the benefits, they would have anxiety, and the testing doesn’t always work. One main reason that a child should not the test is ,they could have anxiety for the rest of their lives. If a child took the genetic test they could learn they have a deadly disease they don’t know about yet.
On the other hand, genetic testing can be a lifesaving aid for those with a severe ailment. For example, say that your family has a risk for colon cancer. If you get testing, you will know if you are at risk. If so, you will know your treatment paths that you could take. Doctors like Dr. Leonard state that they would like to have every person get genetic testing so that ailments like cancer could be caught before they even begin.
Embryos created using in vitro fertilization, which is the fertilization of an egg in an artificial environment, can be tested for specific genetic diseases before they are implanted in a mother’s uterus. This test is called Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and can be very useful as it is the least unethical of all the tests available prior to the birth of a baby. In this technique, multiple eggs are matured and divide until the 6-8 cell stage, at which point some of the cells are extracted and tested for genetic damage. Although this technique is extremely accurate, even a test that shows a healthy DNA does not ensure that the baby will be born healthy. Additionally, it is possible that all of the embryos that are tested carry the genetic disease.
1. Did you effectively research and debate your topic? Why or why not? Yes, I do believe that I effectively researched and debated my topic on mandatory genetic testing for athletes.
According to the Mayo Clinic, “If you were having gene testing to determine if you might develop a certain disease, a positive test doesn't necessarily mean you will get that disorder” (“Genetic Testing Results”). While a positive result leans towards an increased likelihood, many other factors will be added into the chances. Sometimes the tests even project the wrong allele. “In a study in which researchers gave nine labs a genetic variant and asked them to analyze it, the labs gave different answers 22% of the time” (Schumaker). The tests work well enough to get a basis for a talk with a doctor, but alone the tests only tell what could
Sharing of genetic risk information obtained from genetic tests greatly impacts both individual and family members bringing the bio-ethical dilemma to clinicians as well as patients. Disclosure of genetic risks has been regarded as an obligation or duty rather than a mere personal issue. This paper addresses the logical arguments over the right not to know about genetic risk, while focusing towards the responsibility to share such genetic risk information with others. This paper proposes that the rise of new molecular ethics resulting from advancements in genetics emphasizes that people have an ethical obligation to have the test, be aware of the risk and communicate that data to others. In order to identify the principal arguments for and
1. Genetic testing and design has come a long way in a short few decades. From the invasive method of amniocentesis (procedure where the needle must be inserted through mother’s belly and into amniotic sac), fast forward to 2016. Today non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPTs) exist where a mother simply has a blood sample taken from her. It can give a 99% accurate prediction of whether the fetus will have Down Syndrome and it the test can be conducted as early as 9-10 weeks, whereas more invasive methods must wait until 16 weeks or later (Testing Baby’s DNA, Renee).
According to Merriam Webster, Genetic testing, also known as DNA testing, allows the genetic diagnosis of vulnerabilities to inherited diseases, and can also be used to determine a child's parentage (genetic mother and father) or in general a person's ancestry or biological relationship between people. Now, with Genetic Diagnosis, comes a very controversial topic, also known as, preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, which simply involves checking the genes of embryos created through IVF (In vitro fertilization) to allow a specific inherited disease or condition in the family to be withheld from passing it on in their offspring’s. A number of families have DNA that contributes to problematic health issues.
Decoding the entire human genome within the past decade has led the industry to develop inexpensive gene sequencing. This discovery has enabled many individuals to access their own genetic information. It’s critical to learn and explore what’s in our genome in order optimize our healthcare and take action to avoid any potential deaths. Regardless, there are numerous ethical and personal choices to consider before disclosing genetic information. While learning about which genes are risky would help us make lifestyle changes, the cost of the risk determines how we prioritize our approaches in different scenarios.
The thought of mapping out the human genome can be both exhilarating yet unsettling. There are many benefits and disadvantages that can arise from any genetic testing. Altshuler, Daly and Lander (2008) consider human genome mapping provides a powerful approach to identify genes and biological processes underlying any trait influenced by inheritance, including human diseases. For individuals, the main advantage from genetic mapping would have to be the prevention of diseases. Knowing which genes can pre-dispose us to certain diseases will bring a public health awareness and health promotion to a lot of individuals causing a positive impact on not only the individual themselves but on society and medicine as a whole.
Is Genetic engineering Safe? Genetic engineering is the modification of an organism’s genetic composition by artificial means, often involving the transfer of specific traits, or genes, from one organism into a plant or animal of an entirely different species. Human beings ought to consider the pros and cons of genetic engineering before using it. It is a contentious topic because people have different views of weather genetic engineering is safe or not.
By understanding the genes and experiences of those before us, we can play a role in enabling our bodies to a healthy future. Through my research, I found that my family’s gene pool is
As with all of our actions in nursing, and the health care profession, we must also consider the many implications our actions may have. “Providers who receive requests for genetic testing in children must weigh the interests of children and those of their parents and families” (American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, & American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors, 1995). One must consider the many ethical considerations of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Testing should be carried out only if there is a timely medical benefit toward preventative measures. For example, it may not be prudent to test a young child for early onset Alzheimer’s.
In this essay I will be writing about what genetic testing is, the different types of testing done, the advantages of getting tested, and some of the disadvantages of getting tested.