The Struggles from Gentrification
Do you know any areas around you that were once seen as rundown, but are now a lot more commercialized and improved? This is the result of gentrification. What is gentrification you might ask? Well, gentrification’s dictionary definition is a process of urban development in which a city neighborhood develops rapidly over a short time, changing from low to high value. This may sound like a great thing for the neighborhood that can bring a lot of benefits, which it does, but nothing is foolproof and perfect. It definitely comes with many negatives and downsides for these communities, like the displacement of individuals to name one. Gentrification has been affecting the San Francisco Bay Area communities harshly,
…show more content…
Thus, removing a lot of the culture and identity in these neighborhoods. A TedTalk by Liz Ogbu about Gentrification mentions how there was a plot of land that was vacant for years and was used for many temporary events to bring some joy to the Bayview Hunters Point community. This plot of land eventually turned into a permanent redevelopment plan and the companies talked about selling the land to developers. This angered the community because they knew these developers would only build complex condos and wouldn’t add any more resources or jobs to the community. This confirms the suspicions of poorer communities' inability to have a say in what is developed in their community. These developers are only there to seek profit and don’t pay any attention to the residents. The influx of inessential development plans does no good for the deeply rooted residents. In addition to this, the same TedTalk by Liz Ogbu describes what it feels like to be gentrified as a resident. She brings up words like “vanished”, “rent doubled”, and “no longer belong” while explaining to give …show more content…
The culture and identity of our communities are what make up the community. There is no community without its own unique culture to set itself apart from others. In a book written by Manissa M. Maharawal about Tech-Colonialism, she discusses the problems that come with gentrification in the areas. The text shows, “The first tech boom of the 1990s and early 2000s saw thousands of Latinx families displaced as dot com companies and their employees moved in, causing a wave of cultural erasure in the Mission District neighborhood.” The Latino community in the bay was harshly affected by tech colonialism and the sudden increase in incoming residents. It experienced a “cultural erasure” as the book calls it. This pushed the whole community into a whole new type of culture and completely diminished the original one. All those deeply rooted families and businesses were just thrown away instantly only for some extra money. More examples of the culture being jeopardized are also from the same book written by Manissa M. Maharawal about Tech-Colonialism going on in the Mission District in San Francisco. It mentions,” In the most recent tech boom, the transit-accessible and "hip" Mission District has again become central in the city's eviction and displacement crisis: between 2009 and 2013 there was a 27 percent decrease in the
Alexandra Pelosi interviews with the tech employing have the similar element. The techies don't speak on the issue of gentrification, but they focus on how the scene of San Francisco is the perfect place to develop and create new ideas that will, in turn, lead to better connectivity worldwide. Rhe documentary shifts to the dark side of progress, by focusing more on the act of displacement that the natives of San Francisco are experiencing. Gabriel Sealey-Morris analysis address songs, “Burke's pentadic ratios provide a tangible demonstration of how the songs while using the same essential elements, create remarkably different effects with remarkably minor shifts in emphasis” (Sealey-Morris 408). While Gabriel Sealey-Morris analysis addresses songs, her statement rings true to my analysis because of the scene, San Francisco, is the same in both viewpoints of gentrification, but the effects of the gentrify are shifted to emphasize their elitist demeanor of the cost of progress has on the natives of San Francisco being displaced.
Gentrification is the process of improving a struggling neighborhood for affluent people. One of the main causes of this shown by Kelefa Sanneh’s article “Is Gentrification Really a Problem?” , is the real estate market. Things that affect the value of something in a certain neighborhood can end up having a direct influence in all of the neighborhood and can lead to gentrification. The construction of a luxury apartment building can attract more businesses and in turn, more high-quality living spaces which could eventually displace someone living three blocks away.
The average price of the condos on the waterfront went from $219,000 to $200, 000 in the past few months (Seward pg.2, 2015). This decrease in housing prices is not common, though. It is found that when gentrification occurs, the average rents in a neighborhood rises. This is due to new renters who come to these neighborhoods who can afford to pay higher rents which raises the rent (ICPH pg.2, 2009). Resultantly, this causes people to move due to the increased rent.
State-led gentrification refers to the process where policies and initatives driven by the government facilitate gentrification, which of is seen as a widespread contovisal topic within the modern sustain society. This generayes the process of urban development, where lower income neighbourhoods undergo considerable change to create more of a appeal towards those of a middle and high income society. This process implemented by the government as a urban ‘renewal’ transformation causes an inflow of wealthier new residents to move in at the cost of evictioning existing residents in the area demonstrating the impacts surrounding the use of state-led gentrification. This essay will critically assess and evulate the impacts of state-led gentrification
In this article, “Gentrification”, by Sherman Alexie, the author tells a story about his neighborhood. The authors story was one where he thought he was doing the right thing but yet once he had done it, he did not feel good about it at all. The author shows how there is still racism in America and that can change the way people see things. The author shows this through a personal story that happened awhile back.
San Francisco was once notorious for its urban renewal that lowered housing affordability for its displaced residents. Starting in the
I have lived in East Oakland my whole life. To the majority of people, the mention of East Oakland evokes thoughts of violence, shootings, and gangs. I was one of the people who believed in these stereotypes, and for a particularly long time. I was one of the people who saw Oakland as a wasteland, a place with nothing to offer me, and a place I had nothing to offer to.
As Thomas states in her writing “Some of the developments in Barrio Logan have been affordable housing developments, so a lot of the families that used to live in a duplex or studio [now] live in a brand new apartment with more amenities. This point illustrates the beauty in some of the homes being built and making it more afforded to stay in luxury. In Diane Palmer, book Gentrification , a Dictonary of American history, she states that “Some observers say that without gentrification, vibrant inner cities would cease to exist.”. I like what she means by this. From my personal experience I say that I see what she talking about when I go to visit a friend who live in a community like this and I must admit that it does seem very tempting to want to move to one of these communities.
Gentrification is the process of renovating and improving a house or district so that it conforms to middle-class taste. Real Estate investors usually take low-income places that they feel have a chance to prosper economically, and turn them into areas that attract the middle and upper class workers. In doing so they feel like the low-income areas will be safer and more appealing, attracting more people to visit and live there. An improvement to a poor district sounds beautiful, but is gentrification as great as it’s sought out to be? Many residents have their doubts about gentrification due to the idea that the costs of their living will go up and they will be driven out of their neighborhoods.
There has to be a realistic solution that can be put into motion to benefit everyone involved. Referring again to his article “Is Gentrification All Bad?” Davidson argues that urban renewal, if done right, is not a monstrous custom that it is painted to be; nevertheless, he reasons that gentrification depends on who does it, how they do it, and why they do it. As a resident in New York, a city where gentrification is as widespread as the common cold in winter, Davidson speculates that those who go into a neighborhood with the intention to renovate houses, or abandoned buildings ought to have a good reason for it. The author points out that “Gentrification does not have to be something that one group inflicts on another…” (Davidson 349), rather, he suggests that everyone, the gentrifiers and the locals, be on the same page when it comes to developing their
Gentrifying a once rundown neighborhood into a vibrant, more attractive environment is a trendy, urban operation that has been prevalent in Philadelphia. It has transformed the lives of many Philadelphians and the new community members that move into these neighborhoods tend to be young, wealthy, white folks. However, the former impoverished residents that are relocated and kicked out of these now newly gentrified neighborhoods are nevertheless part of the population and economic class that contribute to the landscape of the city. It is a shame to think the problem of poverty is pushed away in an apathetic manner. There should at least be a mix of housing options in these neighborhoods in order to keep the authenticity of the neighborhood.
This chapter talks about the cultural, economic, and social effects and consequences of gentrification. The article focuses on Sydney and the character and causes of gentrification. Taste and aesthetics play a big role in housing and gentrification, which can influence how the housing economy changes. In chapter 11, the main topic of discussion
Bennie calls it “the takeover (70)” in the book. Gentrification is what its called when wealthy people and businesses move to low income areas and rebuild and move in and push out the low income businesses and families because this change makes it more expensive for families to live there. “The place that Sierra and Bennie used to get there hair done had turned into a fancy bakery of some kind, and yes, the coffee was good, but you couldn’t get a cup for less then three dollars. Plus everytime Sierra went in, the hip, young white kid behind the counter gave her either the don’t cause no trouble look or the I want to adopt you look(70).” While Izzy enjoys sitting in the new, expensive coffee shops and writing poetry, the threat in the changing culture is shown when Sierra is chased through the streets by spirits and no one in the white neighborhood will help her because they assume about her and think the worst of her for being
Title: Gentrifying Chicago neighborhoods. General Purpose: To inform my audience of Gentrification in the Norther part of Chicago around the 1960s. Specific Purpose: At the end of my speech, the audience will understand the meaning of gentrification, how Puerto Rican families in the Northern part of Chicago lost their homes to Gentrification, how they fought against gentrification, and how gentrification is now occurring to Mexican families in the Southern part of Chicago. Thesis: Puerto Rican families lost their homes in the 1960s when Lincoln Park was gentrified despites their best efforts, and today Mexican families are losing their homes in Pilsen to gentrification. Introduction I. Attention: What would you risk in order to continue having a home?
Soon there will be no home for minorities and lower income in San Francisco. The districts of San Francisco soon will lose all its original dwellers to the high demands of the Bay Area. The new, “improved” population is overtaking a district such as the Mission that historically has been home to Central and South American immigrants. As you stroll down Valencia Street, once home to taquerias, bakeries, bars and auto mechanic shops, one can instantly see the difference.