ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

1008 Words5 Pages

Gerrymandering Gerrymandering is the redrawing of political boundaries, otherwise known as district lines, in a state to give one party a numeric advantage over the opposing party. This is done by dividing districts up into highly irregular sections to achieve the goal of having voters from a particular party highly concentrated in some areas and thinly scattered in other areas (Donnelly, Fortune). Gerrymandering has been criticized because it violates the two basic principles in electoral designation; compactness and equality of size of constituencies in electoral designation (The Editors, Britannica). There is currently no law against the process of Gerrymandering. However, the current Supreme Court case Gill v. Whitford could change that. …show more content…

State Legislature gerrymanders in 37 states and the elected state lawmakers are responsible for drawing their own legislative districts and the boundaries for the congressional districts in their states. The governors in most of those states have the authority to veto the plans(Murse, ThoughtCo). In Independent Commissions, panels are used in six states to redraw legislative districts. They keep politics and the potential for gerrymandering out of the process because they are apolitical(Murse, ThoughtCo). State lawmakers and public officials are prohibited from serving on the commissions. Some states also prohibit legislative staffers and lobbyists, as well. Seven states use Political Commissions with panels made up of state lawmakers and other elected officials to redraw their own legislative boundaries. Even though these states take redistricting out of the hands of the entire legislature, the process is highly political, or partisan, and often results in gerrymandering districts (Murse, …show more content…

"The core technique is to jam voters likely to favor your opponents into a few throwaway districts where the other side will win lopsided victories, a strategy known as 'packing.' Arrange other boundaries to win close victories, 'cracking' opposition groups into many districts."(Murse). Packing and Cracking are the two main tactics for gerrymandering. Packing is when the opposing party’s members are grouped into a single district. This ensures that the opposing party will win that particular district, but the other party will will all of the other districts. Cracking is when the opposing party’s voters are broken up and scattered throughout districts to make them the minority in each district. Both methods are effective in preventing the opposing party from winning any of the electoral

Show More
Related

  • Gil Vs Whitford Case Summary

    490 Words  | 2 Pages

    Redirecting, according to Loyola Law School states that the redirecting plan “is the way in which we adjust the districts that determine who represent us.” Ultimately, referring to the thought of the state being either Republican or Democrat due to those in assembly and senate; in this case Republican. The argument here is to determine whether or not ‘extreme partisan gerrymandering’ is constitutional or unconstitutional. The ruling is still uncertain but the chances are that it is unconstitutional because it is making the vote of democrats less significant.

    Read More

  • Gerrymandering Pros And Cons

    785 Words  | 4 Pages

    Because there are two practices for effective gerrymandering, there can be political advantages for the parties. The two successful practices are the “Packing a district” and “cracking a district” (Greer 1). The packing a district means to gain more and more districts in favor (Greer 1). This will cause less packing or votes to go to the opposed party. It is simple.

    Read More

  • Assignment 2: Congressional District Analysis

    351 Words  | 2 Pages

    Previous representatives include Ben Chandler, who was a Democrat and served from February 17th, 2004 to January 3rd, 2013, and Ernie Fletcher, who was a Republican and served from January 3rd 1999 to December 8th, 2013 after resigning when elected Governor of Kentucky. In very recent years, from 1979 to present, Representatives have had a “tug-of-war” game with elected Representatives’ party affiliations switching from Republican to Democrat between every election. However, from 1979 to 1866, Kentucky’s 6th district was represented solely by Democrats with only one Republican representative being elected within 113 years. During this time, in 1931, Kentucky 6th congressional district was changed to an at-large district and continues to use the at-large voting system to this

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

    813 Words  | 4 Pages

    To make sure they win a majority vote in every single district, they redraw the boundaries, so there is a slight majority of their supporters

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Filibusters

    1184 Words  | 5 Pages

    Congressional committees are designed to make the legislative process more efficient, but they often only

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Texas Voter ID Law

    1128 Words  | 5 Pages

    In todays current society, the Federal Constitution provides that the times, places, and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives is prescribed in each state by the state legislature. Congress is allowed to grant power by holding elections, which is where power is matched, by the state to control over the election process for state offices. Overall, state qualifications to vote are set by the states, subject to certain restrictions in the Constitution and its Amendments and the authority of the federal government in enforcing the Fifteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The authority has limits based in the Constitution and its Amendments. States may not use certain factors in determining qualification.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Congressional Gridlocks

    1486 Words  | 6 Pages

    These districts usually result in partisanship representatives usually determined by the demographic characteristics of the district under consideration (Hirano et al, 2010). Hence, such representatives will largely hold on to their constituents viewpoints and this limits the possibility of bipartisanship efforts that can be used to break congressional gridlocks. The rise of anti-government sentiments has built distrust among the people who look for solutions from other areas. As such, legislations such as the Affordable Care Act among others become a tough sell on the ground and this takes the form of partisanship stand in the Congress and Senate (Teter, 2013). The ensuing gridlock becomes difficult to break resulting in

    Read More

  • Examples Of Time To Put An End To Gerrymandering

    950 Words  | 4 Pages

    A typical example of a political gerrymander is when a district of mostly democratic voters is required to

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College System

    1006 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the constitutional convention of 1787, our nation's founding fathers came together to come up with a method to elect a president at a time when the majority of Americans couldn’t make an educated decision when voting so Electors who trusted with the responsibility to represent their state and make an informed choice. Our founding fathers came up with an indirect method, the Electoral College, which proved successful by allowing Americans to choose their state representatives and senators who would represent their vote and through a majority choose a president-elect. Through the electoral college, each state gets two senators and a varied number of state representatives depending on the population of their state that the people vote for themselves

    Read More

  • The Texas Constitution: Redistriction In The United States

    666 Words  | 3 Pages

    The plan ultimately passed, but it ended up before the Supreme Court. The court ruled that the state would have to adjust the district lines and submit the changes to the court for approval before the November election. Tom Delay was indicted on “state charges of illegally diverting money to the campaigns of state legislators who drew the map” and forced to resign his position.(14) The most recent case of gerrymandering began in 2011 when the Republican legislature redrew the congressional district maps based on the 2010 census. On May 10, 2017, federal judges ruled that Republicans racially (unlawfully) gerrymandered three congressional districts along racial lines in order to maximize the party’s changes to retain the seats, and to weaken the growing electoral power of

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Congressional Activism

    124 Words  | 1 Pages

    Lawmakers rarely interrelate straightforwardly with other states on strategy, but the laws that Congress Senate approves, can influence

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

    586 Words  | 3 Pages

    The other side would argue that the districts aren’t representing the people if they are carefully constructed by the majority leader. They aren’t going to really represent the people they are going to represent the

    Read More

  • Essay On Texas Government

    944 Words  | 4 Pages

    Interest groups in Texas are relatively powerful actors in the political process. Organized interest groups and their representatives, also known as “the lobby” participates in the policymaking and political processes in Texas. Interest groups provide critical channels for Texans to communicate their political preferences and attempt to influence government actors and their fellow

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

    1370 Words  | 6 Pages

    In newly captured districts created by cracking, serious officials that want to challenge this require extra fundraising just to meet balance with their gerrymandered incumbents, money that is less likely to come from citizen constituents since they constitute such a marked minority in the district (Schumate). Even in party strongholds that are created by packing, the effect of campaign finance is felt through candidate to candidate giving. Candidates with excess cash are permitted to donate it to any candidate they choose, creating a strong incentive for incumbents, even in “packed” districts, to fundraise like there’s no tomorrow, in order to build up political chits(Schumate). If gerrymandering produces a diminution of citizen faith in the democratic process, it would plausibly discourage constituents from donating to their congressional campaign or any other, further diminishing the incentive for Congresspersons to act in accordance with voter preferences (Schumate). Finally, the fact that our redistricting system affords redistricting power to state legislatures in the first place adds a new dimension to the campaign finance wars.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

    982 Words  | 4 Pages

    But recently gerrymandering has become more controversial because people feel that it has taken away their rights as a voter and it swings the votes to one side by a big percentage. Current cases are before the courts to decide if gerrymandering is legal. Some states have been discussing whether it should still be allowed during elections. “Many efforts are underway to remedy this political

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

Open Document