Scientists have been making advances in technology and science since the beginning of time. This may make life easier for us but no one ever thinks about the consequences, what bad can come out of all of this good? Who is to blame for the negative impact the advances can have on the world? Is it the Scientist or is it the people using it?
Science often sparks many debates because of its controversiality. The scientific advancements that have occurred over the last few decades have received attention because of the funding and regulation from the government that is required. Although some people support government regulation of scientific advancements, others do not. Scientific advancements are the development of the natural world and its surroundings that are meant to enhance life. Government regulation is control by authorities to establish order.
The washing machine for example, it gave men and women an easier and faster way of washing clothes. It saved women loads of time so that they could also focus on other things around the house. Another example is the traffic signal, officers used to have to stand in the middle of an intersection directing people, one after the other, but not after this was invented. Not only did it decrease the percent of fatalities on the road but it made driving so much more easier and comfortable. Drivers didn’t have to watch a man telling them when it was their turn any longer and people also couldn’t take advantage which in this case if you ran a red light it would cost you.
By the late 1800s advances in industry, science and technology were occurring faster than ever before. Demands to the industries became the driving force behind greater advances in technology, and sparked tremendous interest in scientific discoveries that pushed for progress. These advances in industry, science and technology, lead to great social changes. Many supported the Idea of progress in that modernization will improve material conditions and a better life for more and more people in the long run. As explained by Marquis De Condorcet in The Progress of The Human Mind.
NASA’s funds should not be cut because of its direct impact in our daily lives, the economy and reputation of NASA. As mentioned previously by President John F. Kennedy, “No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish.” Even though the U.S. government is in the midst of a financial crisis, they need to look at the bigger goal. If the government does not increase NASA’s funds, the superpower could lose its status as a leading technological hub and the debts would keep piling on. As a result, the U.S. would fall behind other competitors such as Russia, China and India who have the same goal as NASA.
It is an innovating field that keeps humankind going. As mentioned in the article, Importance of Technology in Our Lives Today, “Technology saves lives”. Healthcare systems have been enhanced through technology. X-rays for example have not only made our lives easier but have also made our lives healthier. It also enriches global connections within nations making trade and economies fluctuate.
Some of the possibilities NASA has for Mars are, as the article says, “plans for radiation shielding, centrifugal artificial gravity, in-transit consumable resupply, and a return-lander.” (Williams) This quote explains a few possibilities of how NASA could colonize Mars. Any of these possibilities could potentially work in the future. An advantage humans have with Mars colonization is that the days are similar.
Over the course of history, there have been several technologies and theories that have either been altered or restored by advancements in the field of science. These theories and technologies were all developed and invented by renowned philosophers and scientists during the scientific revolution. Two scientists, Isaac Newton and Galileo Galilei both developed their own theories which were used to change old teachings and would eventually revolutionize the world. All these new ideas and innovative technologies replaced previous traditions and shifted the world’s attention resulting into them to have various different reactions.
The influence of Kepler, Copernicus, and Galileo influenced the development of the scientific method, which is a logical procedure used for gathering and testing theories. This impacts the world today due to the fact that the scientific method is a key involvement in our classrooms and the ability to draw conclusions from reason and facts is the process used to discover many scientific phenomenons such as, the DNA structure or even the recent findings of water on Mars. The Scientific revolution also brought the first thermometer and microscope, two important scientific instruments that are still utilized in many laboratories and classrooms. Such notions of reason and order sparked so many breakthroughs in the natural world, which then moved into different fields like mathematics, philosophy, and even
The scientific process allows us to disprove or prove the cause of an event. The field of science has broadened our understanding of how things may work in what we see in nature and in our lives. The scientific process has provided plausible explanations of the world since there is not a higher power to directly communicate with for the sake of understanding the
Over the past couple of centuries, science has most definitely come a long way from where it started. We now have far more powerful data analysis techniques, more sophisticated equipment for making observations and conducting experiments, and overall a much greater depth of scientific knowledge. However, with these advancements have come quite a few new discoveries/inventions that haven’t given science a strong name. For instance, the famous atomic bomb that wiped out Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although scientists have in fact developed an enormous amount of progressive ideas/inventions, along with those good ones have come quite a few inferior ones as well.
Why do you think NASA should be unfunded? I think they NASA should be funded because they have an excellent crew and the projects made wouldn’t have happened without NASA. First, they’ve gotten a man on the moon! There’s rovers on Mars now discovering if people can live on there in the next couple of decades. They’ve sent a voyager to Jupiter to discover the patterns of the planet.
Technology on Children’s Social Development Technology The technology in the millennial generation is quite improving, increasing, developing and addicting. Technology pertains to something situated at home and academic environment (Rowan, n.d.). Therefore, it can be referred to as computers, televisions, cellphones and other electronic gadgets. Children now a day are more exposed to technology since they like to explore new things.