“The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun” - Wayne La Pierre (Pierre). Gun control will not make America safer, but will make the good guy unprotected. The only thing stopping a person is their own heart, and no law will make a person’s heart soften. Gun control is not the answer to America’s problems. Gun control is not the answer to society’s problems because of the 2nd Amendment, the right to hunt, and the fact it will not stop criminals. First of all, The Second Amendment proves Americans have the right to bear firearms. “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”(ProCon.org). Americans have the right to own firearms, and this is one of Americans’ most important rights. The people have to stand firm and not allow opposers to take their rights from them. “The founders understand that the right to own and bear laws is fundamental and as essential to maintaining liberty as are the rights of free speech, a free press, freedom of religion, and other protection against government encroachment on liberty delineated in the Bill of …show more content…
“In 2011, there were 13.7 million hunters 16 years or older in the United States, and they spent 7.7 billion on guns, sights, ammunition, and other hunting equipment”(ProCon.org). Americans invest in hunting because it is a major hobby for them. Guns are a huge money maker for American manufacturers, and helps the economical flow. This is why guns are an important piece of American society. “According to a Feb. 2013 Pew Research report, 32% of gun owners owned guns for hunting and 7% owned guns for target or sport shooting”(ProCon.org). One of the main American hobbies is hunting. Many people use it for their time to witness God’s creation and to get out of the routine of work to relax. This is one reason why guns should not be taken
Thesis: The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees the right to bear arms, remains a controversial topic in American society, with strong arguments on both sides of the debate. The Second Amendment was adopted in 1791 and is part of the Bill of Rights, which ensures individual liberties and limits government power. It states that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " Supporters of the Second Amendment argue that it is a fundamental right that protects individual freedom and provides a means of self-defense.
Stricter Gun Control Laws: A Safer Society The debate over gun control has been a longstanding issue in the United States. With the rising number of mass shootings and gun violence, stricter gun control laws have become a topic of discussion. The question remains, would stricter gun control laws be better for society? This essay will argue that stricter gun control laws would indeed be better for society.
The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Us americans don't need to “bear arms.” Some may say that many people use them to hunt but there are many other weapons you can use to hunt with as well as protecting yourself from danger. By having the second amendment, it gives criminals the right to go out and harm people, whether it be a family member, friend, someone you walk past. Statistics say that “The U.S. has an estimated 283 million guns in civilian hands.
There has been talk over the years about repealing the second amendment. The right to bear arms should not be repealed. It is a very important amendment for many reasons. A few of those reasons include hunting, self-defense, and recreational purposes, like competitions.
Imagine you are a hunter, you own a gun, use it legally and responsibly, it is your prized possession. How would you feel if our government banned guns and took the right to keep and bear that gun away from you? In this country, there are people that live in the mountains like Alaskans for instance, that use their guns to get their food. These people live in remote areas, do not have groceries stores or neighbors nearby. As a matter of fact, their food supplies are wild game, such as deer and duck, that they hunt for food.
For many years, during the time that most of the “west” was considered Frontierland, people would hunt for animals only to sell the furs and meat. This was a way of life for many people, and the way of life still exists today for many. Many Americans today fear that their rights to gun ownership are threatened by big government. There are a lot of politics that go into even attempting to revoke rights from citizens. Currently, the government uses agencies like the ATF and FBI to enforce laws that restrict ownership of several types of weaponry, or use very strict guidelines to obtain things such as cannons or class three weapons (Full autos).
Me personally I love to hunt and shoot guns, I do every time I get the chance and I plan to conceal carry when I get older for self-defense purposes. I agree somewhat if the government wants to take our guns away speaking for all of the
Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years. Many citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would reduce the threat of crime. People have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of hunting and recreational activity. With the recent events involving firearms and mass shootings, people are skeptical whether to increase or decrease gun laws. Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns and stricter laws and licensing will not effectively save lives.
Im assuming that no one in here will ever go out and commit a violent crime involving a firearm. However i cant guarantee that some people we are around everyday will not be involved in a violent crime. I'd like to tell you today why gun control should not be put into large scale effect . I'd like to bring up the number of violent crimes involving firearms in the united states in the year of 2013 before the bulk of the gun control movement had started (refer to chart). IN the year 2013 there were 16,121 homicides nation wide and out of that number 11,208 of them were caused by a firearm of those deaths approximately 750 of the murders were committed with an illegally owned firearm which shows that you do not have to be a felon that is unable to possess a firearm in order to take someones life with one.
Statistics show that comparable to other democratic nations the United states has a higher proportion of gun related violent incidents than those states where gun control legislation has been adopted. An example would be the case of the United Kingdom, which had approximately 2,261 Violence Against the Person (VAP) Offences involving firearms, including low velocity Air weapons in 2015/16 . If this is then compared to the United States which had, in the same period, 9,616 gun related murders and a million VAP offences that did not end in a fatality, then it can be argued that the NRA’s outdated mantra is illogical . There are many further problems with the NRA argument that can be identified in the modern era. , but the main issue would be the NRA’s reasons for the existence of the Amendment.
This is some people’s jobs and we cannot stop jobs or recreational things from happening everywhere. Hunting was here long before farms and grocery stores it was the key to survival and now many people follow in their ancestors paths. This is how things are and I support
This is due to the fact that hunting for food has a long history in American culture and has been recognized as a legal activity by the Supreme Court. The court determined in the case of United States v. Miller (1939) that the Second Amendment does not protect weapons that have no rational connection to the maintenance or effectiveness of a well-managed militia. However, it also agreed that the amendment provides protection for hunting firearms like shotguns. In addition, the Supreme Court ruled in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) that a person's right to own weapons for legal purposes is protected by the Second Amendment including hunting. Therefore, it may be said that the Second Amendment allows Americans to engage in food hunting as long as they are doing so with legal weapons and for legal reasons.
The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.
Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.
The following argument is in favor of gun control. The restrictions on guns in place today are not nearly sufficient considering the level of gun violence seen on a daily basis. In the article “Stronger Gun Control Laws Will Save Lives” it is stated, “The fact is that very few federal laws regulate the manufacture, sale or possession of firearms, and those currently on the books are filled with loopholes or significantly tie the hands of law enforcement.” Arming citizens would not reduce crime or allow for self-defense, it would merely place guns into the wrong hands of people who are not trained enough or mentally stable to handle them. This is why there are so many school shootings and public massacres on television constantly broadcasted