Linda Tagliaferro explains the Genome Project and its “revolution in medicine”. This project was huge back around 1989, which had plans to create the perfect human beings. The project planned to help human change their genes and make them stronger to prevent diseases and help avoid people who have “genetic flaws” (Tagliaferro). Scientists will take the egg and sperm of a healthy human female and male, then combined them to test it genes and if it has developed any sort of disease. If any were developed, the embryo would either be tossed or it could have its genome changed to rid of it from the disease.
While some patients may not be concerned with the long-term consequences due to an already poor quality of life, new findings are warning they need to worry of the effects it will have on their future children. Because gene therapy is designed to permanently replace a malfunctioning gene, there is a looming risk the transferred gene may eventually rebel or pass on devastating mutations to the coming generations
Some cons might be that the stem cells primarily come from terminated pregnancy. Most people who believe that life begins at conception are strictly against this kind of research. “The supporters of embryo-destructive research want to cross a great moral divide. They are seeking not only to destroy human life made in God's image but also to manufacture life made in man's image.” (Chuck
Her argument is that we are using abnormal things to get rid of abnormal things; however, she didn’t explained how these abnormalities are different from many other abnormalities that are of great use to human health today. Another point she made was that some women suffer producing these eggs for research even though these women have given their consent. In order to justify this position, she said that because the only way we can see the result of these experiments is to wait and see how the embryo develops, this is an absolute ethical no(Tsiyonut times, 2012). Some of the point can be formulated this way: How are we going to remove the potential side effects of these techniques by doing more research if the potential and existing side effects of these research are the primary point of objection? Give two pros and two cons outlined in these videos.
Human cloning is the formation of genetically copy of an existing human. The word is normally used to refer to artificial human cloning, which is the duplication of human tissues and cells. There are two usually discussed types of theoretical human cloning, namely reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning. Instead of just making specific cells or tissues, reproductive cloning would involve making a complete cloned human while therapeutic cloning would involve cloning cells from a human for use in transplants and medicine. Two common ways of therapeutic cloning that are being researched are pluripotent stem cell induction and somatic-cell nuclear transfer.
More work should be done to educate people on and create more access to contraception rather than punishing those who were not taught. “What if the fetus grows up to cure cancer?” is a common question posed by the opposite side of the argument. In the same fashion, what if the fetus grows up to be a serial killer? Clearly, that argument is illogical, as one cannot judge someone based on hypothetical future
Some might say that this is not true because there is a new testing methods that can replace the animal testing. In vitro (in glass) testing which allows us to study cell cultures in a petri dish is believed by opponents of animal testing will produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used. In the other hand, we have to remember that cell is the smallest unit in our body. Our body consists of so many organs which work as a system and is inseparable. If we want to examine whether a new medicine will work or not, the experiment should be done in the system that represents the whole human body not only just the cell.
In addition, it is a costly procedure so there is limited access to this treatment. Ethical issues: Offspring of germ line gene therapy have not provided their consent for the procedure. This process can also be used to enhance offspring i.e.. their genetic and physical features, leaving the patient with unfair advantages in certain situations. STEM CELL THERAPY Principles: Stem cells can be used to generate new cells that can develop into functional cells/tissues/organs and it is therefore introduced in the patients body for this purpose. Procedure: First the patient is exposed to radiation.
However Human cloning is dangerous for the new engineered baby and their moms, so it should be banned to prevent new disease, to constantly limit the population of dying human beings, and to stop unnecessary fees to modify babies. During the process of human cloning when the scientists try to change the genes they will create new and undetected disease
To ensure you have a child with the best possible genes the parents go in and have a lab scientifically alter their embryos, These babies would be the best genetically, giving the baby a higher status within the futuristic world. Without evening knowing it, our lives can be impacted immensely by someone 's actions either in a positive or negative way. With determination, those limitations put on by others
Stem cell research destroys potential human life, and scientists should find other forms of research to obtain stem cells without harming anyone (“NIH Stem Cell Information”). While stem cells are removed (along with the embryo) and used for study to potentially save a life, more risks are taken in doing this than many people realize. As one of the biggest arguments against embryonic stem cell research is that the scientists are sacrificing human life, it is a fair
To convince the audience that embryonic stem cell is unethical, Marwick explains, “ that the research involves the destruction of an embryo.” And to prove that “ a child 's life is important,” he reminds the audience that an embryo is valuable and worth protecting. Marwick’s evidence also reflects his knowledge. When arguing that the research should not be funded, for example, she mentions examples, such as the restriction against funding stem lines. And when putting forward his belief that an embryo is a gift cites Walter, an expert authority on Bioethic. This evidence is very different from that of Glick who tended to cite treatment of sick people when arguing his position that the research should be
Being able to clone may allow the cause of different diseases to be found. Diseases have a major impact on a lot of people 's cause of death. Cloning could allow you to find the causes; why wouldn 't you want to find the cause of a disease. "Researchers hope to use embryonic stem cells, which have the unique ability to generate virtually all types of cells in an organism, to grow healthy tissues in the laboratory that can be used replace injured or diseased tissues ("Cloning fact sheet"). Recreating a human could conflict with religion.
Embryonic stem cells are the cells which potentially provide life to a blastocyst and lead to the creation of a fetus, or baby. Recently there have been many experiments conducted to extract embryonic stem cells from the blastocyst. With this new research, has also come a huge controversy. Although embryonic stem cell research is practiced with good intents and is designed to find cures for people already suffering or living a limited lifestyle due to health disabilities, what is not always mentioned is that another human’s life is being destroyed in the process. These innocent babies, whether it be considered legal or not, are being plucked from their mother’s womb to be used for nothing more than a science experiment.
Free trade relates to this issue because there’s an international trade with purchasing ultrasounds which results into figuring out the sex of the baby and aborting the baby if it’s a female. The global environment also relates to trading from the emergence of multinational corporations. Some scholars such as Steger that we have read for class, would agree with her findings that the start of multinational corporations possibly could affect the abortion rates. These multinational corporations controlled much of the world’s investment capital, technology, and access to international markets (Steger 2013). These corporations potentially have the power in sell ultrasounds over to these countries to figure out the sex of the child.