Couples around the globe seeking to conceive, but who struggled to do so naturally, found supposed hope in the year 1977. The hope was found when Louise Brown was the first baby to be successfully conceived and born via a new and controversial form of baby-making; In-Vitro Fertilization. In-Vitro Fertilization, otherwise known as IVF, is a wildly versatile and complex way of artificial reproduction. It was truly a breakthrough and still leaves the world in awestruck wonder to this day. However, the process is man-made, not God-made. Subsequently, IVF’s positive aspects are slowly being outweighed by its negatives as people begin to face the consequences of messing with God’s occupation. While some people claim that IVF is a positive implement, …show more content…
They say that IVF is a healthy, natural process that brings the joys of parenthood to millions of people around the globe. However, these claims are nothing but falsehoods, as joy is anything but the case when it comes to IVF. Elizabeth Kirk, a health journalist for Aleteia, says that “...this can get...upsetting for the children conceived through IVF, and social science data suggests that donor-conceived children report struggles with identity...origin...depression and substance abuse” (Kirk, 10 Things You Really Need To Know About IVF, Aleteia.org). As understood from Kirk’s writing, IVF is not very joyful in the end with the struggles the child (or as IVF specialists call it) “product” faces. With that initiated, the negative effects of IVF are clear and there is no light in the darkness to avenge …show more content…
IVF results in many ectopic pregnancies (when the inserted embryo begins to develop outside the uterus) infections, premature births, birth defects, and much more. Ectopic pregnancies mean that (unless the woman wants the organs surrounding the uterus to be ruptured, leading to severe injury and perhaps death) that the embryo (which is a living human being by the way) must be terminated. Infections are plethoric and wide in range; spanning from infection in the bladder, bowels, fallopian tubes, uterus, ovaries, and other organs surrounding the woman’s reproductive system. Premature births are most likely in a pregnancy of multiples, which is common with IVF. They can lead to detrimental health issues for the baby (as it has left the womb underdeveloped) and thus plenty of stress for the parents. Birth defects are more common in IVF rather than natural baby-making, and for unclear reasons. Some believe that it is due to the IVF process, while others believe infertility in itself is to blame. Regardless, though, Alexandra Sifferlin, a health journalist for TIME says (regarding IVF and its links to birth defects) that “Among 4795 babies born after IVF [in California]...3,463 babies had congenital birth defects” (Sifferlin, IVF Linked to More Birth Defects, TIME.com). As one can discern, IVF has negligent effects on the millions of mothers and
An investigation took place, led by the Medical Board of California, on the doctors who saw Nadya during her pregnancy. It turns out that Nadya created all of her fourteen children with in vitro fertilization while she was unemployed. In this case study I feel like there are many ethical dilemmas that need to be addressed. I believe that the first problem we encounter is the physician who implanted the embryos.
Interest in Existing Argument is the response Cohen gives to proponents of her Harm to Children Argument, to whom which uses these new reproductive technologies. Cohen’s critique of these proponents of new reproductive technologies is, she believes that it is better to be alive than not to be, even if there is health risks to children conceived through IVF. Cohen believes that serious illness and defects are not necessarily a deterring cause (with the exception of serous cases) because, its better to be alive than to not exist at all. " …in almost all cases, better to be alive than not, and these children would not be alive but for the employment of these techniques, using them to bring these children into the world is justified." (textbook
Cynthia B. Cohen 's argument against using harm-causing reproductive technologies is, she believes it would be wrong to forge ahead with these technologies despite the significant proportion of children born with serious illness and disorders. Cohen believes that the use of reproductive technologies produces serious deficits in a small number of children and asks whether, if this is so, it would be wrong to continue to use them.
In Vitro Fertilization treatments involving numerous cycles increases a woman’s chance of multiple pregnancies; consequently, it results in an increased risk of premature birth and lack of healthy weight in IVF newborns (Storck). Additionally, IVF treatments pose some financial drawbacks for its recipients. IVF is extremely expensive once all the components--”surgery, anesthesia, ultrasounds, blood tests, processing the eggs and sperm, embryo storage, and embryo transfer”--are added up to show one IVF cycle’s expenses, which can be between $12,000-$17,000; likewise, infertility treatments are not typically covered by insurance companies, adding to its cost even more (Storck). With IVF being costly both financially and emotionally to many recipients, plus the added stress
Previously, abortions were also surgically performed, in which the cervix was mechanically dilated and her unborn baby was manually removed from her body. This, as a result however, posed a high risk of trauma to the cervix that responds to the body’s hormones—not a doctor’s tools—to remain closed during a pregnancy in order to sustain that pregnancy; and the damage, moreover, can also be suffered by the uterus, which is where the fetus develops before birth. With damage to these organs, any appropriate development for subsequent pregnancies are hindered. Therefore, the woman is put at greater risk for faulty subsequent pregnancies, with possibilities ranging from premature birth or miscarriage to infertility all together. Modern technology, fortunately, has developed ways to manipulate biology so that abortions no longer have to require the mechanical disruption of the cervix or
For centuries women were always supposed to just bear their husband’s child, and be nothing more than a mother and wife. This created lots of problems, such as the millions of childbirth related deaths and home abortions. This eventually sparked an initiative in Margaret Sanger. As a result of the death of Margaret Sanger’s mother due to multiple childbirths, Sanger was motivated to finding a prevention of pregnancy that could potentially save lives (Gibbs, Van Pyke and Adams 41). This task, however was not easily achieved.
CHAPTER EIGHT INSERT GRAPHIC: FLYING STORK, 37456708M THE OPTIMISTS’ CLIFF NOTES FOR BOLD AGENDAS, BRAVE ACTIONS This book, WHY KNOCKED UP?, began with a mission to unravel the Knocked Up Paradox: Despite more than 50 years of The Pill, a healthy dose of sexual freedom, a dazzling array of contraceptives, and historically low birth rates, about 50 percent of all pregnancies--some 3.4 million a year--are accidental, unplanned. Along the way, I described the forces driving that paradox, the far-reaching consequences resulting from so many Knocked Up pregnancies, and why we need to create the ways and means to stem that tide. So, we are here, on the route to this book’s exit.
What Is Right About Having Children? Some philosophers hold that having children is impermissible under any circumstances, call this view global anti-natalism. Among these philosophers, David Benatar (2006) introduces a famous asymmetry argument on individuals’ evaluation of pain, pleasure, absence of pain and absence of pleasure (30-31). Based on this argument, Benatar believes, “Being brought into existence is not a benefit but always a harm” (28);
Fortunately, there are other methods to having kids, such as adoption. II. Thesis
One con is that there can be a termination of embryos. This means a miscarriage and that wouldn’t be good because you would pay so much money for the baby and the baby could die. There is also another con and that is that there is a possibility of there being damage to the gene pool. In other word this means that it can increase or decrease the genes in the baby and the next generation. Also the genetics of the baby can come out imperfect.
“A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives” this quote by Jackie Robinson reminds me of an article I recently read by Kathryn Jean Lopez titled “Egg Head”. In this article she uses rhetorical situations and strategies as a way to persuade and inform her readers, young women of the dangers of IVF (in-vitro fertilization). By using pathos, ethos, logos and the STAR method I will explain how Lopez expressed her views on the situation. Pathos refers to emotions, creating a response out of your feelings. Kathryn Jean Lopez makes a statement about her concerns.
While some people belief that by using IVF the people are destroying the natural cycle of life. They belief that a baby should be born through a natural process and that by using IVF the people are “playing God”. They also argue that IVF “dehumanize women and reduce them to empty vessels waiting to be filled with babies for the benefit of men” (Farris Naff 19). They believe that women go through the process of IVF because they want to satisfy their partner instead of themselves. Even though, IVF can be convenient for women, it is known that IVF can have some bad outcomes to some.
Everyone is entitled to choose their own lifestyle, whether they want to have a child or not. Some females who seek to have children find it easy, although some are unfortunate. There are numerous of reasonings, such as being too old to be pregnant, damage to the Fallopian tube or uterus and cancer radiation or chemotherapy. As our generation goes on, many discoveries revolving biology is produced and one of it is the In Vitro Fertilization or “IVF”. It is the procedure of fertilization where they save sperm sample, take an egg from the women and physically combining it in a laboratory dish where the egg and the sperm is now called an embryo.
Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) are the major problems faced by infertile couples undergoing in-vitro fertilization1.Early embryonic mortality is very high in humans, and it was analysed that the principal cause for failed pregnancy is an error of implantation2,3,4.The incidence of recurrent pregnancy loss should be approximately 1 in 300 pregnancies. The etiologies for RPL are parental chromosomal abnormalities, uterine anomalies, endocrine dysfunction, autoimmune disorders, maternal and paternal age, infectious diseases, environmental toxins, etc. Spontaneous pregnancy loss is a common occurrence; approximately 15% of all clinically proven pregnancies result in spontaneous abortions, even many more pregnancies fails prior to being clinically recognized. Only 30 % of all conceptions results in live birth5. At least three consecutive pregnancy losses before 20 weeks from the last menstrual period is said to be recurrent miscarriage or habitual abortion.
The egg travels from the ovary to the uterus (womb) where the fertilized egg grows. If there is something wrong in the uterus or the fallopian tubes the woman may not be able to conceive naturally. This may be due to: Previous Surgery Submucosal fibroids Endometriosis Previous sterilization treatment . Causes of infertility in