The Pros And Cons Of Juveniles

We must repeal the juvenile system due to its copious faults. This system does not work which is why juveniles need to shape up. Juveniles should face trial as adults when they commit serious crimes because age does not justify crime and victims often suffer from these crimes forever. Whenever people say that juveniles should be subject to lesser sentences seeing as they are children, it makes no sense. Age does not justify committing a crime.

Let me explain why. For Starters, the Juvenile Justice center doesn’t help some of the troubled teens. According to “Report: Juvenile justice system schools “do more harm than good”, it states, “Overall, 30 percent reported they had been physically or sexually abused, 37 percent had problems with hearing, sight or teeth, and 20 percent “wished they were dead,” according to the report.” So not only are the teens not being helped out, but they are getting abused physically and sexually.

Not many kids commit these critical crimes, but most of the ones that do, need someone to help and listen to them. Because of how rarely kids commit these serious crimes you wouldn’t need a whole building, just a small segment that offers the help they need. In an adult jail the kid cannot interact with anyone and cannot be housed with anyone, but if they had the an area sectioned off, then the kids would be able to have that correspondence with others An annex in the juvenile hall, especially for young adults who committed major crimes would be a good alternative to keeping, already unstable, minors in jail where they will be engulfed in complete silence and seclusion. Kids who commit dire crimes are a lot of the time sent to Adult jail, which catapults already fragile kids spiraling towards insanity, so an area set apart for just the serious cases will really help those kids feel safe and give them the protection they need while also keeping them away from the community.

Specifically, when this is done by a teenager. Should they get harshly punished, or do they deserve a second chance? Juveniles who commit crimes should not be given life sentences. Teenagers do not deserve to get life sentences because their brains are not fully developed yet.

They are forced to waste more life doing that and then trying to find a job labeled as a FELON. We should not and shall not prosecute juveniles the same as adults because they are not the same in the brain, it will ruin a person’s life, and there is still hope for them to change their ways and become a good influence in

Juveniles should be charged as adult not only because of their age but because of the crime they committed. According to all cases of teen killing there is 1,300 that has been sentenced as an adult to life. Is not right to put a child behind bars because they're brain is not fully developed so they're not mature, but a crime is a crime.

Juvenile Justice Essay In the United States, there have been many cases where a juvenile would be found guilty and be tried as an adult. There are other cases where those juveniles are tried as adult forever. I am against charging juveniles as adults when they commit violent crimes, the juveniles lose many educational opportunities and the adult system is far too dangerous for the young juveniles. Juveniles are also young kids but only the fact that they do not get the same amount of education or experience that other teens gain.

There have been many times over the years where a child commits a crime and they either get the punishment of a child or they get the punishment of an adult depending on their age, or depending on what the crime they committed was. If you send a child to adult prison it is a lot more harsh than juve so they have to be kept from the other inmates because it is too dangerous for them to be around them. The children transferred to criminal court were less likely to commit the same crime than those who went through the juvenile system. The children who re offended offended sooner and more often than the children who were tried in the juvenile court. In some states if the child is convicted in criminal court they can plead insanity and get out of the of the sentence they would be facing.

Minors do not often understand what they have done, and killing does not bring justice. Violence is not the answer, and brings out the worst in most individuals. Minors cannot drive, drink alcohol, nor vote, so why should they be convicted of an adult crime if they cannot do things adults can? According to apecsec.org, minors understand right and wrong for the most part, but they do not process the fact that one wrong action can lead to execution.

Doing so has had countless adverse effects on the youth. Despite this, many prisons and facilities have turned a blind eye to these negative factors, and continue to plant them in the adult systems. Children should not have to be put in jails and prisons with adults because they have an increased chance of being raped, educational services are often too expensive, and their minds are inclined to becoming mentally unstable, which often leads to suicide. Solutions to these issues include lifting the ban that prevents grants to be awarded to inmates, and abolishing children from adult jail facilities altogether. Conversely, others may argue that these children deserve this treatment, children are becoming more intelligent and know right from wrong, and that these sentences will show others what can potentially happen.

There are many victims of unfortunate circumstances in the world today, yet some of these results could have been easily avoided. In the novel, Just Mercy, the author Bryan Stevenson addresses many cases in which children under the age of 18 are incarcerated within the adult criminal justice system. By treating children as adults in the criminal justice system their innocence and undeveloped person, become criminalized. These children become dehumanized and only viewed as full-fledged criminals and as a result society offers no chance sympathy towards them. Stevenson argues that children tried as adults have become damaged and traumatized by this system of injustice.

If the adult brain and Juvenile brain are different than it only seems fair to treat them one another in a peculiar way when relating to crime. It is completely absurd to believe that a 12 year old can be held to the same standards as a 30 year old. Yes some do deserve to be in juvenile hall but not in prison with older inmates who have fully comprehended that what they did was most of the time inexcusable

They believe that heinous crimes committed should be tried the same, regardless of age. Heinous crimes are unacceptable and shall always be treated with severe punishment; however, life without parol is not a reasonable punishment for juveniles. Punishing juveniles without parole or a sense of rehabilitation takes away their life. It takes away their chance to learn and change, to mature and grow. Alonza Thomas was fifteen when he was charged with armed assault and robbery.

Most will often wonder if there is actually a future in the juvenile justice system and if so what does it include? Today the juvenile system is known as a weak system that does not actually provide much help for juveniles. Although, this system is effective for a few juveniles, it does not work for them all. The juvenile justice system is the primary system that they use on juveniles who are caught committing crime. The system is put into place in hopes it will deter juveniles away from future crimes to keep their life on track.

“Imprisoning kids to ‘teach them a lesson’ is an almost surefire way of teaching them how to be more criminal” (Rozzell). In an effort to reduce juvenile crime, some states passed harsher legislation on juvenile crime, but in many cases, states did not get what they wished for. Criminologists analyzed the effects of New York’s Juvenile Offender Law, which lowered the age a minor could be tried as an adult in certain circumstances. Compared to a control group in Philadelphia, there was no effect on the levels of serious juvenile crime. When Idaho passed legislation in 1981 that minors be tried as adults for serious crimes, researchers found that juvenile offenses actually went up.