ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Military Protection

326 Words2 Pages

The most obvious form of protection is the physical sort. With a social contract, a person acknowledges that they are giving up “absolute freedom”, which is the basic, natural freedom-- the kind where humans are free to murder, to to lie, to cheat, as humans are surely capable of such things if there is no respect for government. In giving this up, they secure protection from a higher power such as the military. The police are there to protect citizens from attackers, while the military is there to protect from foreign affairs. However, that being said, people still want the ability to have their own political liberties. This protection does come at a cost-- many of these protections are funded with tax dollars, a situation that has been politically contested for centuries. Citizens want a strong military, but not one strong enough to overpower their own liberty. …show more content…

There is a grey area of exactly how far people wish for this protection to be stretched, one that doesn’t have a true right answer. One example of this situation is the size and funding of the military. After the war on terror began, politicians began lobbying to increase the size of the military in order to gain a stronger upper hand in the Middle East. Many people were incredibly in support of this idea-- they thought that, in order to succeed, they needed to be able to win those battles. However, certain politicians believed that this wasn’t America’s place to interfere and that the army should be smaller, and with it pulling out of the Middle East. They believe that this would save lives of the troops. Neither view is either right or wrong-- both have their merits-- but both have to do with the thought of freedom versus safety, and how much people are willing to get up to achieve

Show More
Related

  • Who Killed The Constitution By Thomas E. And Kevin R. Gutzman

    1457 Words  | 6 Pages

    I agree that certain acts are ridiculous and unconstitutional, but I also feel that some acts are implemented to keep us safe. It seems there is a very thin line when it comes to violating the constitution, and the government sometimes crosses that line. The problem is that no one knows exactly where the line is, and different people have different views on where the the line is drawn. What I think seems necessary for national security is definitely not going to be the same as what every single American citizen thinks. The key is to educate ourselves on the matter and make our own choices when it comes to constitutionality.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The USA Patriot Act

    1203 Words  | 5 Pages

    During peacetime, civil liberties expanded. Still, criticisms on the patriot act should lead to amendments. The future of the Act will likely involve amendments to limit the scope and powers of law enforcers. The goal of such amendments will be to protect personal freedoms and individual rights. One of the greatest things I can take away from the patriot act is that the government's success in preventing another catastrophic attack on the American homeland since September 11, 2001, would have been much more difficult, if not impossible, without the USA Patriot Act.

    Read More

  • Usa Patriot Pros And Cons

    1461 Words  | 6 Pages

    The USA PATRIOT (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001) was a necessary and effective piece of legislation that enhanced the security of the nation and will continue, in a modified form, to prevent future terrorist attacks although it was quite intrusive on American’s civil liberties. According to detailed study of the decade following 9/11, “If we just look at the decade between 2001 and 2011, we still see that the number of terrorist attacks has declined since Sept. 11.” So, in terms of achieving its goal, it has been successful. Signed into law by President George W. Bush in October of 2001 in the wake of the terrorist attacks on the United States during

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The USA Patriot Act

    1518 Words  | 7 Pages

    In response, the United States implemented the USA Patriot Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by providing appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act), significantly impacting homeland security within the country. The act introduced surveillance measures, such as monitoring communication networks like telephones and texts, to gather data and identify suspicious activity. Additionally, it allowed for the scrutiny of business records and financial transactions, aiding authorities in investigating potential terrorist acts and funding sources. According to statistics from the Pew Research Center, 42% of the public viewed the Patriot Act as a necessary tool to combat terrorism, while 34% believed it went too far and posed a threat to civil liberties. These differing perspectives reflect an ongoing debate regarding the act's impact on national security and civil liberties.

    Read More

  • Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    953 Words  | 4 Pages

    The moment that the Twin Towers fell in New York, America became destined for change. In the wake of these attacks, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 was quickly passed through congress, and signed by then-president, George W. Bush. The act itself gives the FBI and other government agencies the ability to do and use certain methods, many of which are already used by other law enforcement organizations, to help prevent future terrorist attacks. Since then, this piece of legislation has been the center of much debate and controversy. But, there is ample reason to believe that the Patriot Act is needed and effective.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Declaration Of Independence

    854 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Social Contract is the concept where we the people give up some of our rights to the government in exchange for protection and security from them. One important way the United States moves closer towards the Social

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Homeland Security

    96 Words  | 1 Pages

    To begin with, Counterterrorism measures such as Biometric data collection would not flag Adam Smith as a homegrown terrorist. Even though Homeland Security’s advanced data collection and evaluation methods from have had outstanding triumphs with many foreign terrorists entering the United States. In the same fashion, administered programs such techniques are probable to yield false positives due to temporary or permanently distorted physical injuries. Furthermore, the homegrown terrorist in the U.S. is typically obedient to the laws with authentic proofs of identification with transgressions or not has not been alerted by Homeland Security as a terrorist.

    Read More

  • Civil Liberties Dbq

    147 Words  | 1 Pages

    To be honest I wouldn’t give up my freedom for increased security from terrorism. Benjamin Franklin stated, “They who would give up essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.” I couldn’t have said it any better. We have been fighting for our rights for a very long time. Many people have died to ensure that people have liberties.

    Read More

  • Civil Disobedience Dbq Essay

    518 Words  | 3 Pages

    The government and its laws are in place to protect the countries citizens. However, we still need to make sure that the people in power don't abuse it. "The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it,"(Source 1). The government needs to be checked every now and again or else it will be abused. " In the 1960s, the U.S. was in desperate need for soldiers to go to Vietnam to fight for the country.

    Read More

  • Limited Government Research Paper

    830 Words  | 4 Pages

    Citizens are very protected and served in America, and usually the efforts made in order to reassure our safety and our services provided, are not accounted for or appreciated. Do you know the principles of the United States that protect us? Citizens are protected and served by these few US government principles but many more as well. The ones I will be talking about are limited government, popular sovereignty, and separation of power. They are ways to make sure we can govern ourselves and do it fairly with fewer unhappy citizens and more grateful citizens.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Civil Liberties

    1030 Words  | 5 Pages

    Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Alexander Hamilton

    1590 Words  | 7 Pages

    The United States spends more on its defense than any other country in the world, in a democratic state whose constitution Alexander Hamilton helped to inspire. It’s questionable as to what lengths a democratic system should go to keep its citizens safe as ultimately security cannot be unconditionally guaranteed. Having a debate between liberty and security is by no means a new one, its influence on political thought can be profoundly polarizing, as the extremes of both liberty and security can be witnessed around the world and throughout history. The principles that must be prioritized within a democracy while still affording safety, revolves around the ability of citizens to exercise their political liberties.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Semi-Automatic Assault Weapons

    927 Words  | 4 Pages

    “58 Killed, 546 injured in Las Vegas Shooting by lone gunman”1 screamed the headlines of the New York Times on Oct 1, 2017. The lone gunman was Stephen Paddock who in a matter of ten minutes fired more than 1,100 rounds of ammunition killing and injuring over 600 people1. The fact that Paddock single-handedly wrecked such havoc was totally enabled by the fact that he was shooting using semi-automatic guns. This is just one recent example of the horrific results of a semiautomatic assault weapon when used wrongly. Had Paddock been using a hand pistol, a hunting rifle or a shotgun which needs to be reloaded after every shot or a round of five shots - he would have managed to kill or injure just a handful of people in that same ten minutes.2

    Read More

  • How Did Hammurabi Impact The World Today

    874 Words  | 4 Pages

    It helps protect the people that cannot or do not know how to protect

    Read More

  • Just War Tradition Essay

    1716 Words  | 7 Pages

    In the Constitution of the United States entrench a requirement and action to have a profession, which ensure the protection and safety of the Nation and State, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, …, provide for the common defence” . Basically, this statement is the presumption, that part of society gain a mandate to render an essential obligation to the Nation in a specific area, in particular case this is a defence. In order to fulfill stated obligation, part of society must have the necessary knowledge and skills. Next, they have to ensure and gain public trust and autonomy in their action. Finally, set high moral standards that reflect the values of society.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Military Protection

Open Document