The Martian Accuracy Report Luis Olvera AF The movie “The Martian,” tells of an astronaut (Mark Watney) and his journey to Mars. After a good response from viewers for being quite scientifically accurate, NASA went as far as using the movie to advertise their own actual missions to Mars, that will be attempted in the next few decades, or even years. This report will talk about 2 accuracies the movie made that follows what is currently known about space travel and Mars, and the one inaccuracy that deals with the effects of the Martian atmosphere on the human body. The first and major accuracy that the movie made dealt with the science, calculations, and accuracy of all of the space travel that was mentioned in the movie. To start, the movie
It was a major challenge that cost 25 Billion dollars to the Americans(“NASA”), but that could have an incredible impact on the world by improving technology and how people were perceiving the world. The Soviet proposed a moon program, so that both nation could collaborate effectively together in order to develop new technologies and be on the moon faster, unfortunately because of their opposite opinions and point of view this program failed and both countries worked alone (“The Space Race”). The USA were determined, this could really change their position on the international scene. NASA scientists developed the Apollo 11 (“Cadbury”), a rocket capable of sending three astronauts to the moon and come safely back on Earth. The astronauts were Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins (University Nebraska).
If the agency is caught lying about this, it might open up the door to a wealth of other conspiracies like aliens on Mars or the Hollow Earth Theory. NASA CAUGHT RED HANDED IN PLUTO LIE While NASA is celebrating the release of some beautiful new Pluto imagery, others aren 't quite so fast to join the party. According to some conspiracy theorists out there, the images from the agency are not new at all. In fact, they were taken three years prior before any spacecraft were up there. This brings up a couple of possibilities.
For instance, NASA scientists accept that VASIMR would have the capacity to head out to Mars a great deal more rapidly than a contemporary concoction fueled rocket, and afterward, once there, to refuel on Mars for the return flight to Earth. The VASIMR motor could likewise even help secure space explorers from the perilous impacts of radiation amid their trek. In the less-removed future, VASIMR could even help keep the International Space Station (ISS) in circle without obliging additional fuel to be raised from
This is evidence that the moon landings were faked because only two astronauts walked on the moon at a time, yet in photographs such as this one where both are visible, there is no sign of a camera. Who could have taken the picture? ‘The cameras were mounted to the astronauts ' chests,’ said astronomer Phil Plait. In the picture above, Plait says, "you can see [Neil 's] arms are sort of at his chest. That 's where the camera is.
Should humans risk their lives to colonize Mars? Humans should definitely colonize Mars! Humans could die, but what would happen if they lived? Anything is possible. Humans should colonize Mars because Mars is the new frontier, Mars has elements that are useful for humans on Earth, and many people have done so much research toward making Mars habitable.
Instead, Einstein proved that the Earth was rotating around the Sun in a straight line, but that the curve had been distorsioned because of the mass of the Sun, but in this case, the Earth moved freely. Black wholes used to be a mystery to the human, since they did not know at all what were they or what happened until Albert Einstein came into play. Humans thought than in black holes, nothing escaped, not even light which is true. Einstein 's theory said that the closer you are to the mass of gravity, the slower time passes, which explains once again another part of his theory that is: gravity can cause time to dilatate. Thanks to this, we know now why people do not age in black holes and how they work.
This debris and piece of Earth molded together to form the Moon. The Moon then stayed and started orbiting the Earth. This theory explains why the Earth has a smaller core that is made of the same material as the Earths core. The impact from the collision could have resulted in the "Earth 's fast initial spin" (Newman). The energy from this collision is an explanation for the extra heating of the Moon.
Who was right? Who knows, today we will discuss the Moon Landing! By Jordan Cornelius According to conspiracy theorist Bill Kaysing, Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong should have been up for an Emmy in 1969, with their performance of “The Moon Landing.” Believe it or not, the theory exists that we never really landed on the moon. On 1969 NASA showed LIVE FOOTAGE of the Apollo Moon landing in 1969, but was it really just that? Some say NASA faked the Apollo 11 moon landing in a studio, but both sides have shown facts to back them up.
Why do you think NASA should be unfunded? I think they NASA should be funded because they have an excellent crew and the projects made wouldn’t have happened without NASA. First, they’ve gotten a man on the moon! There’s rovers on Mars now discovering if people can live on there in the next couple of decades. They’ve sent a voyager to Jupiter to discover the patterns of the planet.
The first, was to place a manned space capsule into a orbital track circling the Earth. The second, was to figure out how space affected humans and their ability to work in that environment. The last objective was to successfully and safely recover the capsule and person inside back to the surface of Earth. However, before NASA could put a man in a capsule they had to make sure it was safe. In doing so there was a series of launches that were needed to prove that NASA could safely launch a man in space.
Sputnik is world’s first artificial satellite. The word Sputnik means satellite in Russian. It was not good news for Americans because Americans thought if the Soviet Union could send satellite to the space then it means that the Soviet Union can send nuclear missile to the United States. In 1959, the Soviet Union took another step forward with the launch of Luna 2. It was the first space probe to land on moon.
This paradox got me thinking about space travel, and if we will be able to visit other planets like Earth one day. I also started to think about the Drake equation, which I learned about in high school. The Drake equation looks at different things like the formation of stars and the probability of other life-sustaining planets, which in turn gives us a number of civilizations in the Milky Way Galaxy that we can detect electromagnetic emissions from (The Drake Equation). While I thought quite a bit about extraterrestrial life, I also thought about the fact we are stuck on Earth. The first thing that immediately comes to mind with that is how we are going to produce enough food.
Ever since America has decided stop going to the moon enthusiasm and support for space travel and NASA in general has decreased. In 2010, President Obama cut funding for several NASA missions including a mission that would have put Americans back on the moon by 2020. "I understand that some believe that we should attempt a return to the surface of the Moon first, as previously planned. But I just have to say pretty bluntly here: We’ve been there before," Obama said. This opinion is shared by many Americans, but what many Americans don 't realize are the amazing benefits of space travel.