The Pros And Cons Of NASA Initiatives

314 Words2 Pages
NASA’s funds should not be cut because of its direct impact in our daily lives, the economy and reputation of NASA. As mentioned previously by President John F. Kennedy, “No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish.” Even though the U.S. government is in the midst of a financial crisis, they need to look at the bigger goal. If the government does not increase NASA’s funds, the superpower could lose its status as a leading technological hub and the debts would keep piling on. As a result, the U.S. would fall behind other competitors such as Russia, China and India who have the same goal as NASA. A small amount of investment in NASA’s research activities can raise the national revenue. Also, by funding NASA we strive to make new discoveries that could change the whole outlook of the world.…show more content…
We need to understand that investment on space exploration is not necessarily a bad thing. There are bound to be some casualties, but as educated individuals we must look at the bigger picture. We need to understand the value of NASA and its missions before shunning it down. The future of NASA’s projects lies in the hands of the government Privatization can be considered as a solution to the funding problem as entrepreneurs provide the necessary funds and ideas and thus, reducing the burden on taxpayers. NASA has definitely made the world a better place to live and cutting down of funds will only suppress any form of discovery and advancement. Hence, given the advantages of NASA and its challenges, the United States government should take a stance to increase NASA’s stagnant
Open Document