“Medical miracles do not happen simply by accident. They result from painstaking and costly research – from years of lonely trial and error, much of which never bears fruit – and from a government willing to support that work…” -Barack Obama. Stem cell research has been harsly debated due to ethical and religious views; and for good reason. Stem cells have the remarkable potential to develop into many different cell types in the body during early life and growth. In addition, in many tissues they serve as a sort of internal repair system, dividing essentially without limit to replenish other cells as long as the person or animal is still alive. When a stem cell divides, each new cell has the potential either to remain a stem cell or become …show more content…
Most embryonic stem cells are derived from embryos that develop from eggs that have been fertilized in vitro, and then donated for research purposes with informed consent of the donors. After researching the pros and cons of stem cell research, I have come to the conclusion that the research and funding should be continued, due to the potential to transform medicine and save an uncountable number of lives.
Medicine has evolved so much in the last few decades that fertilized human embryos no longer have to die for the production of stem cells. In August 2005, Harvard University scientists announced a break-through discovery that fuses "blank" embryonic stem cells with adult skin cells, rather than with fertilized embryos, to create all-purpose stem cells viable to treat diseases and disabilities. This discovery
…show more content…
For the Catholic Church and many other Christian groups, life begins at conception, making the research equivalent to homicide because it results in the destruction of human embryos. While this may have been true in the past, embryonic cells are not the main source of stem cells now that all the other options are used. Quite honestly, I (along with the majority of the Christian population in the United States) do not support the use of embryos, but I do think other stem cell sources, such as the umbilical cord/placenta, and bone marrow are very important, life saving sources, that should indeed be funded for further research of the topic.
Furthermore, stem cell research offers the hope of cures for chronic and debilitating conditions, such as juvenile diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, spinal cord injuries and blindness, along with many others. One embryo may be the cure for hundreds of different diseases for humans with just as much value of
Over the years, there have been many controversial issues surrounding medical research, but one of the most arguable topics of all time is the use of embryonic stem cells. Some individuals believe that extracting stem cells from unborn babies will be useful to create new medications or, in most cases, help regenerate damaged cells. Although, many people disagree with the process scientists use to obtain these stem cells. By continuing embryonic stem cell research, scientists are denying an unborn child the chance to live, they are not letting nature take its intended course, and they are not adhering to the religious or moral beliefs of many people.
Many people argue that the embryo dies from this, which is why I thought I was going to be against this. But, there ways that stem cell research can be done without killing embryos. Also, the research from this could potentially lead to the cure of cancer which would save millions of lives. One of the biggest
Embryonic stem cell research was established in the early 80’s and has since sparked into a highly controversial issue involving religious debates over the use of human embryos. Embryonic stem cells are considered to be unspecialized cells, which can be manipulated into specialized cells such as a skin cell or a heart cell. The specialized cells could potentially cure conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, heart disease, Alzheimer’s disease, cystic fibrosis, and spinal cord injuries. Despite the large amount of ethical complications that come along with the utilization of stem cells, I advocate that stem cell research should be expanded and developed more widely in the medical field.
In recent years, several competing viewpoints have emerged about embryonic stem cell research. All of this debate raises an important question, Should embryonic stem cell research be conducted for treatment of present and future diseases? People who believe that an embryo should not be destroyed tend to say that embryonic stem cell research should not be conducted. On the other hand, people who believe that embryonic stem cell research creates means of curing diseases reply that the research should be conducted. Embryonic stem cell research “uses special cells found in three-to-five day old human embryos to seek cures for a host of chronic disease” (PRC).
Embryonic stem cell research is an exciting area of regenerative medicine because of the probability of enormous potential for finding treatments and cures for debilitating diseases, disabilities, and cancers. The possibilities to learn and understand human growth from researching stem cells could lead toward a future where human suffering is all but eliminated [1]. The reasons that embryonic stem cells are more favorable than any other source of stem cells is because alternative stem cell lines are shorter-lived and do not have the same level of pluripotency. From a utilitarian perspective, the morally favorable option is to use embryonic stem cells from embryos since they are not equivalent to a fully formed human being, stem cells are taken
Today, our technology is advancing at an ever increasing rate. Science and medicine are making breakthroughs that improve everyone’s quality of life. Life saving medicine, previously limited to the realm of science fiction, is within our grasp. And part of that future is due in part to the amazing research being done with stem cells. However, there are laws in place that prevent scientists from getting as much use as possible from cells derived from embryos, which is the most abundant source.
Certain diseases are at the moment incurable. The study of embryonic stem cells have given researchers a hope of finding a cure. They hope to find the cure for diseases like cancer and Parkinson’s. The affected organs will either be replaced, regrown or will be cured altogether. With this research we come a step closer to saving thousand maybe even millions of lives.
Once we got all our research together, we chose to support embryonic stem cell
Stem Cell research could be the cure to all diseases. There is a lot of controversy over this topic, although, I see no problem with the research being done; if a child is to be aborted anyway, I don’t see a problem with using their placenta for the stem cell research. This research could cure cancer one day. Stem cells have potential to develop into many different cell types in the body during early life and growth (“Introduction: What are Stem Cells”, and why are they important, nih.gov). The article states that when a stem cell divides, each cell has the potential to remain a stem cell or become a muscle cell, red blood cell, nerve cells, brain cell, or any other cell found in the body (“Introduction: What are Stem Cells, and why are they
Not all of the stem cells are controversial. Mostly the only one that people don’t approve of is the Embryonic Stem cell transplant. Embryonic Stem Cell Research is when scientist take cells from aborted fetuses or fertilized eggs and use then for medical research purposes. This causes controversy because it is against most people 's religion to get abortions. Even if it not against their religion, some people still do not like the idea of taking stem cells from aborted babies and putting them into sick people.
Embryotic stem cell research; a big threat or not? The World of science has made certain concepts evolve. As a result, whether or not Embryotic Stem cells can be used suitably is a topic that is very controversial because of people’s various perceptions about the Embryotic Stem cells research. So many countries have agreed to control the embryotic stem cell research in various ways. Embryotic stem cells are cells gotten from the embryo at the stage of development before the implantation will take place in the uterus.
This process provides a safe alternative to embryonic cells, as the stem cells did not produce tumors. Adult stem cells are also being found in more tissues than ever thought (Stem cell Basics). This would allow many different uses of the adult stem cells, as they can only form certain major cell types of a tissue or
Stem cells hold the future. Regardless of the ethics that accompany their controversial usage, stem cells have the ability to expand the medical world as we know it exponentially. The stem cells with limitless abilities are called pluripotent embryonic stem cells. These differ extremely from adult stem cells, which are multipotent. These adult stem cells have limited differentiation.
yet it’s there.” Stem Cell causes numerous consequences for, it was not reliable and this should undertake deeper studies on the other hand this was the only hope for the person suffering from diseases. We should thank God for the life we have. All of us have a special purpose, it is to live and do God’s will. People were God’s creation all of us were obliged to love one another not to hurt others especially the embryos inside the mother’s
Many people view this as destroying a potential for life to futher scientific research and knowledge. A lot of the opposition to stem cell research comes from the moral belief that human life begins at conception and some see it that destroying an embryo for medical research or even to treat another human is morally the same as killing a human child or adult for research. Many people with these views are strongly religious Roman Catholics or Orthodox