The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Imperialism

777 Words4 Pages
How does the country truth fill about the Spanish-American War and, which side are they truly on; the Anti-imperialist or imperialist. Some American wanted to have a third party ticket to try and president McKinley because of the way the war turned out. The essential argument behind this was that the United States was intended to be a place where all men could vote and hold power in the government and furthermore, the United States from its Declaration of Independence was an anti-imperialist power. So when the Eastern conference had its session their discussion was on President McKinley being criticized and held responsible for criminal aggression of the country. Democratic platform, the establishment of self‐government in the Philippines, and his own election as the next president of the United States. His platform, Bryan insisted, was the only means of…show more content…
My imperialist’s argument is why did the Anti-imperialists want a third ticket and what does it say about the Democrats ticket Bryan. Also how they feel about the Spanish-American war and because they were sure McKinley will be reelected as President, because Bryan was tied up in things that the consent of the country cannot support. It is understood that the action of the independents are taking to get a person on the ticket, but it all depends on what the Anti-imperialists conference does. A committee was appointed to visit Tomlinson Hall conference and outline the plan of the league to join in the national third ticket movement. Why are U.S. soldiers and sailors fighting under a British Admiral? I know the U.S. Navy have enough capable Admirals who can lead our troops. When the United States began taking the Philippines the country started producing somewhat of a controversy around the United States. Republicans who fell in line with McKinley insisted that it was for the good of all. Democrats formulated an
Open Document