The direct cause of the ending of World War II was the decision, made by President Truman, to drop the atomic bombs in the cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The nuclear weapon killed a numerous amount of faultless people, estimated to be 70,000 residents in Hiroshima alone. Throughout the course of making the atomic bomb, there were even mixed feelings coming from the sides of the scientists as well as the military. The idea of the atomic bomb came about when the United States wanted a method where the result will outcome in less innocent American casualties. This notion has now become a very controversial issue where there are arguments on both sides. The atomic bomb dropping was a clever decision from the perspective of political terms, …show more content…
They had lost their allies, Germany and Italy due to the invasions by the Allies. Germany had surrendered by reason of the Allies invasion and their discovery of the concentration camps and extermination camps . Italy had surrendered in 1943 due to the recapturing of Sicily, which overthrew Mussolini from power. This left Japan to stand on its own for the attack of the atomic bomb, resulting in them becoming weaker than they already are. Additionally, before the bombing, Japan's military became defenseless by means of previous invasions and attacks such as Pearl Harbour. Most areas of their military were affected, including, air force and navy. Furthermore, Japan knew that the Soviet Union was planning to enter the war in the Pacific and the thought of fighting from the north and south seemed to bring the idea of surrendering, up even more . The American navy had already begun to blockade some areas of Japan before the bombing which restricted most of their area and confined them. Japan was willing to surrender and end World War II since they knew that they were inevitably going to lose which is why the atomic bomb was not …show more content…
had other alternatives to retaliate with Japan in less destructive ways. The Americans made it seem as if the only two options were the bombing of Japan or invasion to make Japan surrender, which was a bad idea in their eyes since it would have created more American casualties . Another method that could have been used was to wait for what the Soviets were planning to do. At this point, the idea of the Soviet-Union joining the war to go against Japan had spread around. Therefore, if the Americans had waited to see if Japan was going to surrender due to the fact of having to fight against two groups of people, the Soviets, and Americans, it would have been a way of reduced casualties. Although, if this plan hadn't worked another method could have been easily brought up. Since the Americans had done tests on the atomic bomb, they could have been able to demonstrate it to the Japanese so that they could be convinced to surrender before they actually use it. The actual demonstration wouldn't have failed even if the technology was new since they had done tests beforehand. Consequently, the Japanese would have begun to fear the Americans for what types of weapons they could use on them to produce the thought of surrendering to them. Substitutions of the atomic bomb should have been present at the time, to make ways for less destruction the real atomic bomb had caused and one that would not kill thousands of
Essay To what extent were the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki justifiable? The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been controversial. There is much controversy over the issue of whether or not the bombings were necessary to ensure Japanese surrender in the Second World War, on terms satisfactory to the United States of America.
When America had dropped the atomic bomb, Japan was in a very weakened state. The navy and air force were destroyed, the land had been surrounded by other armies, and the supplies had been cut off (David M., 421). By these observations, it can be concluded that Japan was in a position much weaker than the had been at the start of the war and recognition of defeat could be seen. This defeat, however, was not declared by Japan and they continued to decline to surrender. Their decline to surrender ultimately led the need of the atomic bombs.
The Japanese were ruthless and brutal when it came to their militaristic decisions and motives. Dropping the atomic bomb was our final hope in stopping them from performing further harm. Either way, lives were going to be taken. The question we must ask ourselves is whether we wanted those lives to be those of Americans or the Japanese. President Truman had to make a vital decision, and using nuclear warfare was the only way to stop Japan without killing American soldiers.
Henry L. Stimson mentioned in his memoirs that they had extensively planned “an intensified sea and air blockade and greatly intensified strategic air bombing… to be followed… by an invasion of the main island of Honshu…”(Source A). This shows that the U.S. had detailed plans to blockade around Japan and invade the mainland using their island hopping strategy. All of this demonstrates that there were options for the U.S. that did not involve direct endangerment of civilians and could just have easily ended the
Japan had noticed they were unprepared for the United States’ firepower. The battle that led the U.S. to control the war with Japan was the Battle of the Midway. In the Battle of the Midway, Japan had lost most of their main navy forces, allowing the United States to obtain complete ownership of the skies in the remainder of the war. Although the Japanese army would not surrender and more troops started sacrificing their own life to kill many others, also known as kamikazes, this represents that the Japanese army were already weak and they could not fight a strategic war. Because Japan was already on verge of complete defeat, the atomic bomb was obviously not needed to win the war.
World War II has been going on for 10 years and for the war to be over Japan or the Allied Powers would have to surrender. The United States and the Soviet Union were super powers with tension that stayed beneath the surface for the duration of the war. The two were in a race to invent and use the first atomic war head. After ten years of war the conditions of Japan were poor and not likely to withstand much more conflict. Yet on December 7, 1941 the Japanese bombed an American naval base in Hawaii.
According to Document B, the Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was against utilizing the bomb since he felt an economic blockade and conventional bombing could get the nation to back out. Although damage still would have occurred due to the conventional bombing, there would not have been such a large death toll and other severe effects. The United States could have also waited a little longer since, according to Document G, Japan was already on the verge of giving in. Therefore, the United States should have considered all their options before going through with such devastating
When Japan refused to surrender unconditionally the U.S. decided to nuke them, this was very controversial but looking back the U.S. made the right decision. Although it was seen as immoral, the U.S. made the right decision because if the U.S. didn’t nuke Japan, Russia would of taken over Asia and quite possibly Europe, it was the quickest way to end the war and the one that cost the least American lives, and nukes are weapons of war and Japan was the enemy. If the U.S. didn’t drop the atomic bomb Russia would of taken over Asia and quite possibly Europe. In document E “Mr. Byrnes was much concerned about the spreading of Russian influence in Europe.” The Mr. Byrnes it talks about was then announced Secretary of state 2 weeks after.
The first reason they should have not uses atomic bombs is because the Japanese did not have enough time to look for an opportunity to surrender. According to Ralph A. Bard, that was the United States undersecretary of the Navy during World war II in June 27 1945, the Japanese were looking for a reason to surrender, so before the bomb is actually used, “Japan should have some preliminary warning... the Japanese government may be searching for some opportunity which...use a medium of surrender”( Document 2). In this quote, he says that the Japanese should have more time or warning before dropping the bomb because he feels that this would give them the perfect opportunity they are looking for to surrender and end the war. He also says that the United States is a “great humanitarian nation” with a “fair play attitude.”
Daisaku Ikeda said “Japan learned from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that the tragedy wrought by nuclear weapons must never be repeated and that humanity and nuclear weapons cannot exist.” The United States ended World War II by bombing Japan which caused radiation damage and devastation to all of Japan. The United States had three main reasons why they dropped the atomic bomb in such a rush. They wanted to limit American casualties from fighting future battles. The United States wanted to establish dominance over the war before Russia could join in.
Japan was weakening, “The food situation gradually becoming worse and worse…” Stated in source H. America had many industrial resources to use against Japan and so Japan had essentially been defeated. Japan pushed only for the sake of their countries honour as the shame of unconditional surrender goes against their code of honour. Furthermore a warning was given to Japan with America promising to drop the atomic bomb, however there was no evidence and so it could have easily been deemed a bluff. An American nuclear scientist stated, “A demonstration of the bomb best be made… Japan could then be asked to surrender.” This source seems somewhat reliable as it is from one of the American scientists and they would know the strength of the bomb.
Soon the U.S was attacked by Japan. The President then decided to drop the atomic bomb to end this war and quickly. The use of the atomic bomb on Japan was justified because it ended the war, was a better alternative than the others given, and helped save lives. The atomic bomb used on Japan was justified because it ended the war.
Japan had to accept unconditional surrender; if they disagreed with that request, America would drop the bomb. What made the Japanese surrender was the retention of their emperor; anything else couldn’t have forced a Japanese surrender, including the attack of the atomic bomb. As Japan's Prime Minister Suzuki spelled out on June 9, 1945. “Should the Emperor system be abolished, they [the Japanese people] would lose all reason for existence…. [and have] no choice but to go on fighting to the last man” (Butow).
Strauss added in his recommendation that the bomb, once it would be used, would give other countries ideas about how to end future world conflicts (Doc H). Strauss was saying that if countries have future arguments, one might think it’s okay to bomb another country to end a war. Just like when Truman bombed Japan to end World War 2. After the bomb, countries started to invent different bombs. Thankfully, none of the bombs were ever dropped yet, but countries could now use them if
President Truman and his associates believed that if they dropped the bomb they would receive surrender from Japan. Thus, saving millions of American lives, and ending the war. Nevertheless, by saving American lives they would sacrifice thousands of Japanese civilians. They had other idea to have Japan to surrender, but were willing to take the one that would have the most consequences. They were thinking too much about the US instead of creating actually peace within the nations.