The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima
On August 6th of 1945, a revolutionary form of destruction was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. The atomic bomb, nicknamed Little Boy, was the first uranium-fission-based bomb to ever be detonated. At 8:15 AM, America wrought destruction and performed the worst injustice imaginable upon the city, its surroundings, and its people. President at the time, Harry S. Truman, gave consent to the creation and use of such a weapon, and quite frankly, is to blame. President Truman should not have dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima because it was the cause of the inhumane murder of over 130,000 innocent Japanese civilians, its motivations were unjustified and there were several, other alternatives to the “a-bomb.” Simply put, the bomb was …show more content…
There were many alternatives, these include a demonstration of the bomb, waiting on the Russians and the continuation of a traditional bombing. In the BBC documentary, there was a discussion of demonstrating the atom bomb upon uninhabited areas of Japan to intimidate them. If this were to have happened, over 130,000 people would not have died and neither would the eighth largest Japanese city be decimated. A reason why waiting on the Russians to invade with ground troops would have been plausible is because it would have tipped Japan over the edge and finally given them a sense of inevitable defeat. This also proves the Truman and America were attempting to terrify the Russians and establish a foolish sense of dominance, yet they still invaded week after the bombing! Finally, there was the argument of conventional bombing over atom bombing. Believably, if conventional bombings were enough to nearly make Japan surrender, why did Truman go even further as to dropping a mass weapon of ruination? The Strategic Bombing Survey states, “‘...even without the atomic bombing attacks, air supremacy over Japan could have exerted sufficient pressure to bring about the unconditional surrender…” (Anesi.Com). Thus, if we had continued with a few more B-23 bombings, we would have reached the surrender we first demanded. Despite these other possibilities, Truman was uninformed and did not take them into account, resulting in a ridiculous, dramatically fatal
Atomic Bombing Dbq
1327 Words | 6 PagesEssay To what extent were the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki justifiable? The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been controversial. There is much controversy over the issue of whether or not the bombings were necessary to ensure Japanese surrender in the Second World War, on terms satisfactory to the United States of America.
Was The Us Justified Dbq Research Paper
1963 Words | 8 PagesThe Japanese were ruthless and brutal when it came to their militaristic decisions and motives. Dropping the atomic bomb was our final hope in stopping them from performing further harm. Either way, lives were going to be taken. The question we must ask ourselves is whether we wanted those lives to be those of Americans or the Japanese. President Truman had to make a vital decision, and using nuclear warfare was the only way to stop Japan without killing American soldiers.
How Did The Us Affect The Bombing Of Pearl Harbor Dbq
1214 Words | 5 PagesAccording to Document G, a memoir of General H. H. Arnold, whether or not the bombs were dropped, the Japanese were already on the verge of surrendering. The United States had already killed about 241,000 people, wounded 313,000, and destroyed about 2,333,000 homes, making it increasingly evident that their decision to drop the bomb was just a selfish and easy manner to end the war. The document also states that the air force was aware that the destruction of most Japanese industries and the prevention of the arrival of the incoming cargo had made it impossible for Japan to carry out a large-scale war. With this fact, the knowledge of their increasing vulnerability was in effect throughout the military and the white house, bringing to light the leverage the United States had going through with the bombings. Overall, the decision to drop the bombs can be viewed as unnecessary as the U.S could have kept fighting knowing that
The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bombs
652 Words | 3 Pages“Dropping the atomic bombs on Japan saved the lives of hundreds of thousands of U.S. soldiers and some believed it was the only way to end the war quickly.” in Dropping the A-Bomb Saved Lives. As a result of dropping the bomb Japan lost lives of soldiers, civilians and land. Japan also lost power in their government because of the bombs, and many business, houses got destroyed and created some tension between the governments. The U.S. only had a few choices since Japan wouldn't surrender the U.S. had to do something.
How Did Truman Use The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay
833 Words | 4 PagesOne reason, they argue atomic bomb should not have been used is, of the many people that were killed by the bomb, many were Japanese women, children and elder. They were innocent people, who were not involved in the war. Another reason experts disagree with Truman is it is said that Japan was ready to surrender. They believe Japan was "on their knees" and the bomb was unnecessary. (ushistory.org) Experts say the bombing was racist.
Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay
565 Words | 3 PagesThe decision to drop atomic bombs was not just a strict military measure to to force japan to unconditionally surrender, but was a diplomatic measure to intimidate the Soviet Union.
The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima
772 Words | 4 PagesEven after the use of the atomic bombs against both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Japanese military still wanted to pursue the desperate option of fighting until the last man fell. The atomic bombs forced Emperor Hirohito to understand clearly, and in a way his military leaders refused to comprehend, that the defense of the homeland was hopeless. It took the
Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bombs
504 Words | 3 PagesThe Article also stated that Truman was forced to keep fighting because “ “Despite their heavy losses at Okinawa and the firebombing of Tokyo, the Japanese refused to surrender.” If I was him I wouldn’t have stopped up until they surrendered. The bombings was one of the most terrible things to happen but they didn’t surrender and so I would have kept fighting. Even though the bombing was unconventional he was able to almost completely destroy Tokyo. In which, the bombing was a source of having less soldiers on the Japanese side.
Hiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq Essay
498 Words | 2 PagesOn August 6th, 1945, The United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing many people. The president at the time, President Truman said that he only wanted to use the bomb in military warfare because it would hurt women and children. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was morally incorrect because the Japanese were ready to surrender, it was a crime against humanity, and it affected their physical self. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unsuitable because the Japanese were ready to surrender.
Truman Inhumane Analysis
300 Words | 2 PagesThe military would tell their soldiers that the kamikaze attacks were for the good of their country, which led the soldiers to believe that their patriotism and pride was more important than their own lives. The Japanese’s apathy for their people and their inhumane warfare needed to be stopped. The US found significant issues with firing of an atomic bomb, such as the civilian casualties it could cause and the post-war problems it could create with the Russians. Despite the possible repercussions of the atomic bomb, Truman would be right to fire off the atomic bomb into a major Japanese city. He would be right to do this because of how it would protect the american citizens from future attacks on American soil.
Who Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay
563 Words | 3 PagesEven though it was very inhumane to cause a fellow breed of the human race such a severe amount of suffering, we fairly warned Japan that disaster would come if they didn’t surrender. Furthermore, we had still been pondering among our hostility from Pearl Harbor, in which we never retaliated to. Most importantly, to prevent the loss of American lives, we had to strike at once. Therefore, President Truman’s decision to drop both bombs on Japan was extremely necessary to ensure the safety of American citizens.
Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay
852 Words | 4 PagesIn the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.
Why Was Hiroshima Justified
1840 Words | 8 PagesThere are many reasons why it could be argued that the dropping of the atomic bomb was justified. One reason is that Japan was warned, they were given plenty of opportunities to surrender such as the Potsdam declaration. The Declaration was issued to Japan by President Truman and the Allies of America after America had tested the Atom bomb on July 26th. The declaration was a proposition of surrender to Japan that linked directly to the dropping of the atomic bomb.
How Did Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb Dbq
719 Words | 3 PagesThe Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.
The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay
581 Words | 3 PagesPresident Truman was treating people even worst by putting them through the torture of the bomb and the resulting effects of the bomb. Time became a major factor into the decision, and dropping the bomb was a result of that fear. On the other side of the argument, the Japanese did bomb Pearl Harbor which was the catalyst that got America involved in the first place. We as a country should not need to compromise with the nation who started the battle.
More about The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima
Atomic Bombing Dbq
1327 Words | 6 PagesWas The Us Justified Dbq Research Paper
1963 Words | 8 PagesHow Did The Us Affect The Bombing Of Pearl Harbor Dbq
1214 Words | 5 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bombs
652 Words | 3 PagesHow Did Truman Use The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay
833 Words | 4 PagesAtomic Bomb Dbq Essay
565 Words | 3 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima
772 Words | 4 PagesPros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bombs
504 Words | 3 PagesHiroshima And Nagasaki Dbq Essay
498 Words | 2 PagesTruman Inhumane Analysis
300 Words | 2 PagesWho Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay
563 Words | 3 PagesShould We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay
852 Words | 4 PagesWhy Was Hiroshima Justified
1840 Words | 8 PagesHow Did Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb Dbq
719 Words | 3 PagesThe Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay
581 Words | 3 Pages