ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Crusades

292 Words2 Pages

During the Middle Ages, the Crusades were seen as "just" wars. In reality they were ethnocentric hate filled conquests that aimed to wipe the Arab race off the face of the earth. During the time they were just because they were for for the "glory of God," but in reality it wasn't a Holy war, it was a blood sport. That being said, in the modern era "just" wars are a necessity in this inherently unfair geopolitical landscape. The little guy has to be protected.
My main defense for "just" wars is rooted in what the international community has failed to do instead of what they have done. For example, major world powers failed to protect the Tutsi ethnicity during the Rwandan Genocide during the 1990s. This was a catastrophe that was widely reported

Show More
Related

  • The Crusades Dbq Essay

    254 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Crusades affected the lives of the followers Christian, Jewish, and Muslim faiths. However, the Jews were impacted the most during this time in the Crusades with only negative outcomes. Almost all of the people following the Jewish faith were tortured by Christians because of what the forefathers had done in which they were getting back at the Jews for killing Jesus for no reason. The Jewish chronicler in 1096 stated, “Let us first avenge ourselves on them and exterminate them from among our nations so that the name of Israel will no longer be remembered, or let them adopt our faith,” (Document D). The Christians forced the Jews to either leave, die, or adopt the Christian faith.

    Read More

  • The Crusades Dbq Essay

    426 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Crusades was a holy battle between the Christians and the Muslims. The Crusades was nine wars all together. With five major wars and four minor wars. Those wars still have effects on modern day society even after a thousand years. Were the results of the Crusades more positive or negative?

    Read More

  • The Crusades Dbq Essay

    706 Words  | 3 Pages

    Introduction: Provide background information on the Crusades, restate the DBQ question, state thesis with reasons. (include academic vocabulary and underline) The results of the Crusades was probably more negative than positive. In “Doc 4”, It states that “Moreover, the assault of one Christian people on another, when one of the goals of the Fourth Crusade was reunion of Greek and Latin churches, made the split between the Greek and Latin churches permanent.” The Crusades had a lot of hatred to the religions, and by 1204 the Crusaders had lost some of their appeal because the knights agreed to attack the Byzantine Capital instead.

    Read More

  • The Crusades: Positive Or Relevant?

    123 Words  | 1 Pages

    Some of the benefits a of the crusades can be a positive but mostly negative. Document five states that they were many battles between the colonies and some traded along the ways of the movement between the countries. This is relevant because even though there were some of the positive impacts,they were still other things that made it incomparable between them. Document seven,it states that the crusades were hard to maintain and often abused christians and jews.

    Read More

  • Crusades Dbq Essay

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    Imagine you're sitting out on your front porch on a bright and sunny day. It’s relaxing, it’s calm and one of the best days in a while. But suddenly it is interrupted by a huge storm and it is now gloomy, terrible, and wet and muddy. But at the end of every rainstorm will be a rainbow. But is there going to be a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow?

    Read More

  • The Crusades Dbq Essay

    823 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Crusades were a violent series of battles that Christians fought against Muslims in order to gain back the holy land, Jerusalem. The Christians felt threatened by the intimidating rule of the Islamic Empire, and their response was the first Crusade. These attacks continued and grew unsuccessful throughout many years, and are often due to the intense bond between Christians and God, however there are other influences, like wealth and power. Some argue also that the actions committed during these events were not necessarily “barbaric”, considering the historical time period. The Crusades should be remembered as a series of attacks with a variety of motives and influences that were violent and barbaric.

    Read More

  • Just War Theory: The American Revolutionary War

    727 Words  | 3 Pages

    A just war can can only begin to be considered soif the war itself was a last resort, waged by an actual authority, and was against a tangible wrongdoing.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War

    89 Words  | 1 Pages

    i think war--violence, of all kinds, really--is always a tragedy; but i also very firmly believe that it can bring about very important and necessary (and even sometimes good)

    Read More

  • In Blood Rites By Ehrenreich Summary

    604 Words  | 3 Pages

    When talking about war, there are many books with few answers to what war truly is. Barbara Ehrenreich brings forth not only the possibilities towards understanding war but also the passion people from history have had towards it. One key issue she brings to light is humanities love for war, so much so that people would use excuses like holy wars to justify their need to fight in a war. She declares that war is as muddled as the issue of diseases and where diseases came from around 200 years ago. More so than that she even goes further on to state that these rituals that date back to prehistoric times are the cause of human nature during times of war rather than human instinct.

    Read More

  • Was The United States Justified In Entering Ww1

    1742 Words  | 7 Pages

    “Justifiable wars undoubtedly include wars of necessity, that is, wars in which the most vital interests of a country are threatened and where there are no promising

    Read More

  • Christian Wars: The Crusades

    67 Words  | 1 Pages

    Ultimately the group of wars known as the Crusades achieved very little gain for the Christian forces, other than a series of "own-goals" (such as the sacking of Byzantium). So, despite a few short-term gains, the ultimate "winners" were the Muslim forces. Persia at the time was part of the Seljuk Empire I believe and therefore was certainly a supporter of the Muslim forces during this

    Read More

  • The Crusades: Success Or Failure?

    214 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Crusades were successful failures because they did not meet many of their goals, but left lasting effects. The Crusades was an attempt by the Roman Catholic Church to regain the Holy Lands from the Muslims. They believed they were fighting for god and all sins would be forgiven and defend the Byzantine Empire from the Turks. The first Crusade (1096 -1099) was successful for the Christians because they had a clear and organized religious based purpose. Crusaders the Christian armies were able to hold Jerusalem and in the process led to a massacre of Jews.

    Read More

  • Negative Effects Of The Crusades

    157 Words  | 1 Pages

    The crusades affected trade in Europe. The way trade got affected was the bad causes that came because of the crusades. During one of the crusade wars, Europe 's good were affected during the wars, because after them, the were running low on merchandise and products. So not only was this bad for merchants, but it was bad for the townspeople, because they need resources. It also affected Europe in another way.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Crusades

    1018 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Crusades were expeditions done by the Roman Catholic Church in alliance with Middle-Age Kingdoms and Empires. There were a total of nine Crusades during the period of 1095 to 1291, led by Saladin, Richard I "the Lionheart" of England, Pope Urban II, Frederick I the Holy Roman Emperor, etc. At first, the Crusades were a way to fight back the Muslims for their conquest of Jerusalem. The idea of the Crusade was a very good marketing strategy by Pope Urban II. It was told that any Crusader would be rewarded a place in heaven, and forgiven their sins.

    Read More

  • Is War Ever Justified Essay

    1469 Words  | 6 Pages

    “Is war ever justified?”, is a question with its solution first originating from Christian theology. Saint Augustine was the first individual to offer a theory on this, and introduced the “Just War Theory”, which was later revised by Saint Thomas Aquinas, creating just 3 criteria to be met in order for a war to be just: “War needed to be waged by legitimate authority, have a just cause, and have the right intentions”. Since then, the “Just War Theory” was been used by many to justify their wars, however, there many other factors that were not taken into consideration that could be used to justify a war. I feel that war is justified and will be looking into points that are for the justification of war. War is justified when there is a “just cause”, and when it is used as a “last resort”.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Crusades

Open Document