Current NCAA policy outlines a three-phase plan to have a full transgender implementation by the 2024-2025 collegiate season (NCAA, 2022). The new policy follows a sport-by-sport approach, considering policies of national governing bodies or international federations. All three phases of implementation require documentation of compliance with testosterone levels. Despite a unified NCAA guideline, each sport's specific governing body adopts distinct policies, set to take effect from August 1, 2024 (NCAA, 2022). The current NCAA policy, with its focus on fairness, inclusion, and safety, provides a platform for transgender student-athletes to pursue their passions and dreams in sports as their authentic selves using the three-phrase plan but …show more content…
In 2010 the NCAA passed a policy where transgender male (female to male) athletes with testosterone treatment can compete on men's teams, but they lose eligibility for women's teams unless the team is mixed. Whereas transgender female (MTF) athletes on testosterone suppression medication may continue competing on men's teams but must complete one year of treatment before becoming eligible for women's teams. (NCAA, 2022). Essentially, any transgender student-athletes not undergoing hormone treatment, participation in their sport is based on their sex assigned at birth. Transgender athletes who identify as female and are not undergoing testosterone treatment have the option to join either men's or women's teams, whereas transgender athletes who identify as male and are not utilizing hormone treatment are not permitted to take part in women's teams (NCAA, 2022). This policy changed as of January 19, 2022, due to University of Pennsylvania female transgender swimmer, Lia …show more content…
Women’s right activist and collegiate swimmer Riley Gaines stands at the forefront within the debate of transgender participation within women’s collegiate athletics. Riley Gaines highlighted in her interview that the NCAA allows transgender female athletes to compete as long as they test for under 10nmol/L of testosterone, while biological females have levels ranging from .8-1.2nmol/L (Riley Gaines Speaks out about Transgender Swimmer Lia Thomas, 2022). The significant difference in testing numbers alone creates a considerable gap between transgender females and biological females, raising concerns about fair competition. It is undeniable that biological males have an athletic advantage compared to biological females and the current NCAA policy allows for only three points of testosterone testing when there are many other factors to consider keeping the integrity of women’s athletics. Furthermore, there are noticeable physical differences, such as height, muscle mass, and lung capacity, which can further influence athletic performance between transgender females and biological females. Joanna Harper, a researcher investigating transgender athletic performance at Loughborough University in the United Kingdom, stated that “.... hormone therapy
Although Wells and Marbella suggest that men’s sports are being hurt because of Title IX, Goodale establishes that Title IX is not negatively impacting men’s athletics and is necessary for colleges to follow. Title IX, a 40-year law establishing equal opportunity for women has not negatively impacted men’s sports, as clarified in “40 Years Later, Title IX is Still Fighting Perception it Hurt Men’s Sports” by Gloria Goodale. First and foremost, sports like Football and Basketball take up a majority of a college budget for men’s sports, and when colleges cut minor teams such as baseball or tennis Title IX is unfairly blamed. A large amount of colleges decide to limit men’s athletic to large money-making sports such as football or basketball
Samantha Kubota’s “School Punished Teen Girl for Working Out in Sports Bra in 100-degree Texas Heat, ACLU Say” (2023) tells the story of a young female athlete. A teenage girl who participates in cross country and track at her high school got in trouble for wearing a sports bra during practice in 100-degree heat while her male counterparts were practicing shirtless. Furthermore, since G.H. wore a sports bra, she was denied the award of being the top runner on the girls’ cross-country team; this award would have been crucial for college recruiting and applications. The girl, who identifies by her initials G.H., requested help from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU sent a letter to her high school stating the coaches, District officials, and employees violated the Fourteenth Amendment and Title IX of the Education Amendments by reinforcing a sex-stereotyped dress code and treating the girls’ and boys’ cross-country teams differently.
Some argue that furthering options for female athletics would starve already successful men’s programs. This is, unfortunately, true to some extent. George F. Will writes in his article “A Train Wreck Called Title Ix” on the Newsweek website that colleges terminated over 400 men 's athletic teams to produce precise proportionality between the genders enrollments and participation in athletics. Although growing women’s athletics did cause some shortage in funding for men it is illogical to deny rights to one people group for the sake of having excess in another group. Female athletic programs were easy to blame for terminating some men’s programs, but if the funding were split more evenly between minor and major sports those programs might have
One experience from personal experiences also illustrates the changes in how Title IX has affected sports. The first story takes place at Stanford University, a school with an athletic program that has been at the forefront of gender equity in sports. Boschert describes how the school’s Title IX, coordinator, Katie Martens, works tirelessly to ensure compliance with the law. Martens monitors the athletic department’s budget, ensure equal treatment of male and female athletes, and investigates complaints of discrimination. Her efforts have paid off, with the school receiving high marks for compliance with Title IX.
In the article titled Face-off on the playing field By, Judith B. Stamper explains girls have their own story of support or discrimination, success also the debate of girls be allowed to compete on boys’ sports team. First, the writer Title IX explains female athletes are been treated second-class for long enough and should pass of inequalities and biases of girls. The writer also clarifies that girls doing sports make them healthier, physically, and emotionally. Other girls that don’t play sports are less likely to use of drugs. In addition, she notes a former Stanford University basketball player Mariah says, strength and independence of things girls learn from sports, the opportunities that are changing women.
First of all, some argues that the tittle IX grants equal sporting opportunities for both male and female students; however, the inequality or unfair treatment for female athletic student still exists. At every high school or college, young female athletics are still facing with the discrimination on the playing field. Women and girls just receive only 42 percent of the opportunities to play sports in high school and college even though female were half of total students.
One of the main complaints against Title IX is that in order to comply with its requirements, men's sports teams have been eliminated. The removal of men's teams has generated controversy because it has been claimed that doing so constitutes reverse discrimination. However, it's crucial to remember that Title IX only mandates organizations to give male and female athletes the same opportunity, not to abolish men's teams. Colleges have opted to do away with men's teams rather than make the necessary adjustments to guarantee equal financing and opportunity for both male and female athletes in order to comply with the law's criteria. The book recounts how, in 1979, Cornell University cut its men's gymnastics team and several other men's sports teams in order to comply with Title IX.
Title IX In the article, “Title IX Under Fire As Colleges Cut Teams” Marbella and Wells talk about how Title IX is hurting men’s sports, while in the article “40 Years Later, Title IX Is Still Fighting Perception It Hurt Men’s Sports” Goodale talks about the benefits of Title IX. In the article “Title IX Under Fire As Colleges Cut Teams” the authors describe how the guidelines of Title IX have been the reason for many men’s sports teams being cut in colleges. In the article it also talks about how the law has lost its way and has diminished opportunities for men as a result. It states, hundreds of men’s sports have been cut across the country because of schools citing Title IX.
In the first place, to address the ratio between boys and girls sport activity, the gap is closing. In fact, in 1970 female participation was nearly 0 percent in high school sports then by 1980 it rose to 50 percent and in 2000 increased another 20 percent (par. 5). That is extraordinary change, however it is not because if the institute of title IX but instead it is the result of a major culture shift within the United States and had nothing to do with title IX. Back in the 1970s girls weren’t prevented from playing sports but it was a stigma of females in
Title nine requires athletic programs to be equivalent to enrollment. The number of sports programs for each sex should reflect the ratio of students enrolled in the school. With more women attending college the need for more sports programs has grown dramatically. I don’t want to get in a political discussion about schools who have cut men’s programs so I will only speak on schools who have added women’s programs. This opportunity has not only improved
Billie Jean King announced to the United States, “ I have often been asked whether I am a woman or an athlete. The question is absurd. Men are not asked that. I am an athlete. I am a woman.”
In the articles “40 Years Later, Title IX Is Still Fighting Perception It Hurt Men’s Sports” by Goodale and “Title IX Under Fire As Colleges Cut Teams” by Marbella and Wells, the authors discuss Title IX and the effects it has on sports. Both Miller and Marbella and Wells mention Title IX as a law put in place to protect young women’s dreams of sports in college by forcing colleges to have their sports’ teams gender proportionality match their school’s gender proportionality. As the law came into effect, women’s teams in colleges were set up and flourished to meet women’s interests and the law’s requirements (Marbella and Wells). Over the years, colleges cut back on men’s sports instead of adding more women’s teams.
Thus, in 2010, the IAAF and International Olympic committee (herein after referred as IOC) formed expert committees to go over and make recommendations regarding the enclosure of women with Disorders of Sexual Development (DSD) or hyperandrogenism in International Competitions without denting fairness and while respecting individual rights and privacy. The new IAAF policy was released in May
If society stops to understand the struggles these women have been facing for decades will have a clearer picture of what steps to take in order to make a change in the sports industry. Men need to put their masculinity aside and advocate giving women a voice. The purpose of this paper is to explore the issues women in the sport world have faced through history, wage gaps, current issues today, and to discuss findings and recommendations for future research. Title IX is a law that came into effect in 1972, this comprehensive federal law prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity.
Gender neutral bathrooms will always be a topic of discussion in everyone lives, however the emotional and economic toll the restrooms would have on others could change someone’s life for the worse. If transgender male and females used their biological corresponding gender facilities, we could lessen those tolls to a minimum. The IOC has tried effortlessly to expand the opportunities for transgender athletes, but just reducing the amount of hormones in the athlete cannot change that they will always have an advantage over non-transgender competitors. One may see the tenacity and the empowerment of transgender movements unnecessary and annoying, but hopefully in future, everyone will see that these peoples stories should inspire others to stand up for what they believe