Death penalty has been long unused in Hong Kong. Death penalty has not been used since 1966, and was officially banned in 1993(Johnson, 2010). However, there are still some countries practising death penalties in the world, especially Asian countries such as Vietnam, Singapore, Indonesia, India, Japan, Pakistan, and most noticeably, China(Johnson, 2010). This essay is going to discuss whether death penalty should be restored in Hong Kong. I would talk about the pros and cons of death penalty, and the need for Hong Kong to restore death penalty. Thus, ultimately suggesting why Hong Kong should not re-practise death penalty.
Death penalty has always been highly praised as one of the most suitable and effective tools to put down the crime rate, especially violent crime such as murder, arson, blackmail, rape, etc.(Amnesty International, 2007). In fact, China claims that death penalty is playing a major role on controlling worsening crime issues(Johnson, 2010). Whilst in actual practice, no significant differences is observed in the homicide trends of Singapore, a city that practises death penalty, and Hong Kong, a city that does not practise death penalty. Death penalty is far from effective on reducing homicide cases. Also, Hong Kong has a low violent crime rate, about 169-179 per 100000 population in 2012 and 2013(Hong Kong Police Force, 2014). Death penalty might not be essential and useful in Hong Kong.
Instead of practising death penalty, most countries prefer doing more
There were almost whole the chiefs take stock of ranked the death penalty last among their priorities for crime fighting, that they did not accept based on murder rates that it deterred against homicides. Most rated it as the least efficient use of limited taxpayer dollars. In the article by Delcour, she states “New York abolished its death penalty in 2007. In the many years the law was on books, no death sentences were upheld by its court nor was any offender executed.” She states on that other hand, “New Mexico get rid of its death penalty in 2009.”
To prove this thesis the subjects of the death penalties history, international neighbours who still use this form of capital punishment,
During the rule of Qin Shi Huangdi during the Qin dynasty, China’s government was based upon the philosophies of legalism. Legalists believed that all people were created amoral, and morality could only come from harsh punishments in society. As punishments, hundreds of thousands of peasants were forced into slave labor. Due to the extreme conditions, many slave laborers died from malnutrition and exhaustion. Today, China is still one of the most frequent instigators of human rights violations, which can be described as the deprivation of the most basic rights that all people are entitled to on birth.
Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, and the debate about its abolition is the largest point of the essay written by Steve Earle, titled "A Death in Texas”. This form of punishment should be abolished for 3 reasons; First, It does not seem to have a direct effect on deterring murder rates, It has negative effects on society, and is inconsistent with American ideals. To begin, the death penalty is unnecessary since it is ineffective at deterring rates of murder. In fact, 88% of the country's top criminologists do not believe the death penalty acts as a deterrent to homicide, according to the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. In opposition, supporters may argue that it may indeed help to deter murder rates as they have
For many years, Australia has debated if they should reintroduce death penalty or not. The year 1967 was the last time when Australia used death penalty as a punishment. There are a total of 22 countries in the world where death penalty is still legal and present and these include countries such as America, China, Afghanistan and North Korea. Despite death penalty still being legal in many countries, it appears that Australia should not re-introduce death penalty. Death penalty should not be legal in Australia since there are other ways to punish a criminal that does not involve death and there never is a humane way to kill an individual.
Deterrence theory states that people follow the law because they are scare of getting caught or being punished. In this article, “The Death Penalty Deters Crime,” David Muhlhausen, expert on criminal justice programs in the Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis and a research fellow in empirical policy analysis, confirms the deterrence theory. By means of statistical data and research dating, Muhlhausen contends that the death penalty does deters murder crime which ultimately saves lives. He also believes that executions and murder rates are somehow connected to each other. Even though, some adequate emotional appeals appeared, Muhlhausen’s article failed to prove, logically, the deterrence theory.
From the beginning of the foundation of America, men have tried to figure out the correct way to deal with law-opposing criminals. From crucifixion and slavery, to death by firing squad and life sentences, the world has utilized different forms of discipline. The death penalty has formed into the most questionable form of punishment, drawing the most attention from the public eye. This sanction is used to punish criminals for committing the most heinous crimes and offenses. The crimes that obtain the death penalty mostly consist of murder which include murder during a kidnapping, murder for hire, drug-related drive by shooting, and genocide.
Canada, one of the countries in the world that have a low murder rate. But even with such low rates, why do some Canadians want to reinstate the death penalty? Is it really necessary to bring back what we have already abolished? Or should we fight our urges for vengeance and look for a solution that 's morally right? Clifford Olson, Allan Legere, Robert Pickton, Paul Bernardo and Karla Holmolka.
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.
The death penalty on the other hand would have been effective if the overall public minded to consider it a system for ending criminal acts. While a monstrous number would ensure the nonattendance of the death penalty in their real system, the wrongdoing rate continues going higher for countries that still practice the death penalty. Regardless, there is lacking accurate data to exhibit that death penalty has been convincing similarly as maintaining a strategic distance from criminal acts. It infers
Today in the USA 36 states still use death penalties as punishment for commiting a crime such as murder or kidnapping and torture of a victim Little did people know after committing such crime they’d experience the same torture they put there victim in . China has the highest execution league table in the world alongside
The death penalty is a sentence that has no use. The process has become too slow over the years to the point where some people die before they get executed. Similar to the case of Max Soffar who may have been innocent, but died of cancer before he had the chance to fight for the freedom he may have deserved(Houston Press). This also shows that the death penalty has taken and ruined the lives of innocent people. A study shows that 4% of defendants sentenced to death penalty are innocent(The Guardian).The second reason is the high number of botched executions that happen in the USA.
Annotated Bibliography Draft Student name : Haider Zafaryab Student number: 2360526 Thesis Statement : Capital Punishment is a very controversial topic around the globe. I believe that it does more harm than good and breeds violence in society. Source 1: Radelet, M. L., & Akers, R. L. (1996).
Each year in many countries around the world people are murdered in the name of “justice”. But can justice really include a sanitised form of revenge? Many people are for the death penalty regardless of what it actually is. A major way that the death penalty is flawed is shown in the amount of innocent people who are sentenced to death.
Why death penalty must end ‘’An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind,’’ said Mahatma Gandhi. The execution of someone who has possibly done a crime is an inhuman act. Death penalty is hypocritical and flawed. If killing is wrong, why do we kill when a criminal has done the crime of killing someone? In this essay, I will write why death penalty should end by writing about the violation of human rights, execution of innocent people, the fact that it does not deter crime and money.