Drunk driving is not something that happens occasionally. It happens everyday of the year. A lot of times, drunk driving victims aren’t the ones who have been drinking. They could be driving home from work one day and get hit by someone who has been drinking.
Snyder uses the percentages of the average alcohol consumption of a certain age contrasting to the amount of time to support her claim. In the graphs provided, it can pinpointed that for “a 20-year-old man who saw few alcohol advertisements...was predicted to have 9 alcoholic drinks in the past month compared with 16 drink if he saw many advertisements”(Synder 5). Snyder uses fear and caution to attract the readers to her statement against the exposures that lead youths drinking. In the article, she states that underage kids “who consume approximately 20% of all alcoholic drinks...are involved in twice as many fatal car crashes while drinking”(Snyder 1). She list other negative effects of
Since drinking can lead to teen pregnancy then if you lower the drinking age teenagers wouldn 't drink because since they want to be rebellious and when you lower the drinking age they don 't want to break that rule so they won 't drink as much alcohol as they do today. Another reason is that studies show that there have been more abortions than there has been underage drinking. For example about 45.5 percent of teenagers have drank alcohol and gotten into accidents and 45 percent have gotten pregnant due to
From high school celebrations to college parties, alcohol has become the main focal point. Moreover, the presence of alcohol has come to dominate these so-called ‘gatherings’, and surprisingly, it has its advantages. Now, in most countries, the alcohol drinking age is within the range eighteen to twenty-one. However, these supposed laws are not impeding young adults from drinking, whether it is legal or illegal.
For example the age limit to join the army or to get married is 16 but to drink alcohol and get a tattoo it’s 18. They state that it is inequality and unnecessary to divide those into groups of ages and that everyone should be combined as one. Yet again, their argument is fair and quite true but they don’t acknowledge the fact that the government has placed these rules and age limits to prevent frantic behaviour. If no limits existed we’d have a whole different world: Children from the age of 10 could be driving, possibly causing harm to themselves and others.
They also use facts and studies to show that the drinking age saves many lives. Since the law was made many studies have shown us that 21 to drink saves people from binge drinking and drunk driving(Dean-Mooney, 1 ). It’s also a proven fact that brains don’t stop developing new paths to use until your mid 20’s and alcohol can mess with your cognitive abilities as well as memory. If a lower drinking age was established these people believe that teens would be more susceptible to diseases and other issues caused by alcohol(Dean-Mooney, 2).
Most teenagers look forward to getting their license and permit to be able to get behind the wheel of a car and drive without parents. The problem with this is many teenagers take advantage of that privilege and become reckless drivers. The government has put laws in place which prevents teenagers from driving alone for the first year and keeps laws in place so teenagers can’t abuse there laws. Meanwhile, many adults still argue the safety on the road even with restrictions in place. These laws are here to keep everyone on the road safe not only the new drivers.
They both blame each other for this distance and they get into a fight. Jules condition worsens dramatically after she stops chemotherapy, so she has to go back to the doctors. The doctor wants Jules to go back on chemo and after thinking a lot, Jules agrees only because the doctor said she wouldn't lose her hair and she would be able to dance this time. As Jules' sickness continues, Paul officially breaks up with Sam, Sam has more fights with her mom, she is doing bad in school, and she still hasn't been talking to Jules for a while. Jules finds out
The issue was left ineffective and the practice won’t be coming to an end any time soon. Of course. But I can see the positives and negatives to the curfew practice and why Congress doesn’t know how to approach it. Due to the small percent of bad decision making drives, also, the worst one, teens having the highest accident rate.
Teens do not know much about the consequences that come when you begin driving. Under age partying and drinking. They drive drunk, which leads to more wrecks and possible death waiting to happen. A lot of teens just want a car to drive, they do not really drive the proper way. The driving age should be changed to 18.
Should the United States lower the legal drinking age, which is now twenty-one, to a more reasonable age, such as eighteen. The legal drinking age is unjust and unfair. Therefore, it should be lowered to eighteen to make all adults equal. Individuals often compare drinking with unsuccessfulness and/or recklessness, and that is not the case at all. Overtime there have been millions of successful and intelligent people that commonly consumed alcohol.
Although it is a law commonly evaded; it prevents young people from car accidents and alcohol abuse or dependence. In the article is acknowledged that “more than 40 percent of college students reported at least one symptom of alcohol abuse or dependence”; a rate that would be highly increased if the drinking age is reduced. On top of that, it is worth considering the magnitude in which car accidents have dropped since the drinking age was lowered. The organization Mother Against Drunk Driving (MADD) CEO Chuck Hurley said “Nearly all peer- reviewed studies looking at the change showed raising the driving age reduced drunk-driving deaths.” It is undeniable that lowering the drinking age would generate an already managed issue in regards alcohol and its relation to car
This would also impair their organization and planning capabilities and may even lead to depression and suicide. The MLDA should not be lowered due to the responsibility required to an individual and others. Lowering the MLDA would lead to more use of illicit drugs among the persons between 18 and 21 years old. It follows that the younger a person starts to engage in alcohol, the higher the chances of using other illicit drugs. Moreover, when the drinking age was 18 years, the cases of fatal crashes caused by underage drunk drivers were twice as many as
The Injustices of the Drinking Age The drinking age in the US was changed from 21 to 18 to solve the problems it had caused when it the legal age was 18, however, instead of fixing these problems, the new age has just covered them up and is causing further trouble. “The change of drinking age to 18 in 1971 was quickly changed back to 21 by 1984 to counter-act the epidemic of drunk driving accidents that it had caused” (“Lowering”.). The drinking age in the US should be lowered to 18 because it would increase the safety and health in teens.