Why drinking age should be lowered? If one is considered an adult at age eighteen in most of the country, are they not allowed to purchase and legally consume alcohol? The minimum legal drinking age needs to be lowered, and not just for that reason. The amount of teenagers with drinking problems and alcoholism is far greater than in Europe, where drinking ages are far lower. Also, studies show that the current minimum age drinking laws have been ineffective to a high degree.
Over the years, the legal drinking age in the United States has been heavily debated. Some argue that the legal age to drink should be 18 or 19 because people at that age are recognized as adults; others argue that the drinking age should be 21 because people who are able to drink should be more mature and have their lives better planned out. Although people are legally adults at 18, they are not yet mature adults; in fact, according to NRP, “emerging science about brain development suggests that most people don’t reach full maturity until the age 25” (“Brain”). Before earning the right to legally drink, people should allow their bodies to fully develop and gain a better knowledge of how to organize their lives. The drinking age should remain
Why shouldn't the drinking age be lowered to 18 Almost everyone can agree that alcohol should not be given to kids or young adults under a certain age.alcohol is a substance that is very dangerous and if you used it incorrectly the consequences can be great in danger to the users or to the ones around them.there’s many reasons why they drinking age should not be lowered from twenty one to eighteen. Drunk driving has caused a big issue in the United States. Has taken many lives. In 2012 a total of 1,168 children age 14 and younger were killed in a motor vehicle traffic crashes of those those 1,168 fatalities, 239 (20%) occurred in alcohol-impaired driving crashes. The drunk drivers don't only harm themselves ,they also kill innocent
First off, jobs are created because someone must make, transport, and distribute the alcohol. Also, due to the higher than normal sales taxes on alcohol, it had a great tax revenue for the federal government. It’s a win-win situation: the Feds get money, while the people have fun and get drunk out of their minds! Alcohol also positively affected the economy because it heavily depended on railroads, telegraphs, and mechanical refrigeration. (The Brewing Industry) Railroads are gaining profit because alcohol producing companies are paying them to distribute their product to stores.
It would be understandable to view the lowering of the current legal drinking age as irresponsible but it would also be unwise to try to fix one problem only to create more. The legal minimum age for the consumption of alcohol in the U.S. is a huge mistake and it needs to be fixed by lowering it for the progression of our legal
Due to the lack of maturity, those who started drinking alcohol at 18 are more likely to be involved in binge drinking or other irresponsible actions. Not everyone has the capable power of purchasing the alcohol at 18 years old. Evidence shows that people have a more mature way of making the right decision at 21. Now, half of the population in Australia agree with ‘raise the drinking age to 21 ' It is time to raise the legal drinking age to 21 in Australia. By doing that, we can protect young people’s lives, and do something to prevent the accidents happen in advance.
They set up the country to become, financially speaking, the largest beneficiary of World War I as the U.S. supplied much of the material used to fight the conflict. It transformed the United States from a debtor nation into the world’s largest lender in a few years. Looking back, the development of the U.S. after the Civil War was inevitable, but the course that it took to get there was not. The Captains of Industry revolutionized their chosen industry and created an economically strong nation that was capable of meeting the challenges of the next century. Were it not for these men, history would have turned out very different for the United
Organizations such as the Anti-Saloon League had argued that violent crime would go down with prohibition, but the effect was clearly the opposite. The prison system saw the same effect from prohibition that violent crime had seen. "The federal inmate population increased 561 percent from the pre-Prohibition period" (tdl.org). The prison systems increase in inmates required an even greater amount of funds from the government, which hurt Americans even more. It created a need for more tax revenue, which threatened the economy and hurt them even more when the economy began to decline in the 1920
As a result, many historians call prohibition an “experiment” rather than a reform. Historians claimed prohibition as an “experiment” based on the facts that it was not successful in completely halting the consumption and production of alcohol. The first Prohibition legislation came during WWI, under the guise of “war legislation” (202). The 18th amendment was designed to restrict the “production and sale of alcoholic beverages” but did not explicitly “prohibit… the possession or drinking of alcoholic beverages” (202). The failure to use explicit language in legislation led to many loopholes for common people and criminals to take advantage