ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act

163 Words1 Page

The Indian Removal Act started in the 1830’s. The indians occupied millions of acres of land in the United States. The two opposing debates formed off of three questions: If the indians were moved, would the effort to civilize the indians be useless? Does the land occupied by the tribes belong to them, or does the land belong to white Americans? How could they prevent the extinction of Native American tribes? The first debate came from President Jackson and his followers. Jackson believed that the land rightfully belonged to the white farmers in America. He also believed that the tribes were nearing extinction and his answer to the situation was to move the indians across the Mississippi and slowly convert them to Christianity from there.

Show More
Related

  • Comparison Of Jackson Vs. The Indian Removal Act

    341 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act, passed by congress, provided for the resettlement of all Native Americans occupying the east of the Mississippi to Oklahoma.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act And Us Policies In 1830

    370 Words  | 2 Pages

    I think there are four main connections that can be made between this piece and the U.S policies in 1830, and all four points are about the four distinct groups present in the piece. The group on the far left is putting up a cross, which symbolizes both how Europeans moved west to spread Christianity and also symbolizes that the actions taken were made in the name of Christianity. In 1830 people, including Jeremiah Evarts were still trying to convert the Native Americans; despite trying to convert the natives, Evarts was firmly against the Indian Removal Act. I think that the piece above represents the conflicting nature of Evarts argument that the natives were people; however, they still needed to assimilate to a certain degree before they

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Jackson And Congress Pass The Indian Removal Act

    234 Words  | 1 Pages

    Andrew Jackson and Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. The Indian Removal authorized the relocation of Native Americans from the lands East of the Mississippi River and to the west. The plan was finished by moving the Native Americans to what is now Oklahoma. The Indian Removal Act was meant to support the expansion of the United States without interference by moving the Natives out of the way. The Indian removal act was rationalized by the self-serving concept of manifest destiny, the belief that the expansion of the United States from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean was divinely ordained and inevitable, was used to justify the eviction of Native Americans from their native homelands.

    Read More

  • How Did The Indian Removal Act Dbq

    661 Words  | 3 Pages

    Do you like getting kicked out after working hard and establishing a great community. On May 28, 1830 Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. This act states that all the indians will have to move from their land that they had first into unknown land that is supposedly a huge hunk of the Louisiana just for them with fertile soil and a water source. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was terrible and unjustified; indians had already build up an amazing society, they were there first, and the americans have already messed with the indians. For starters, the Indians have built up a respectable town.

    Read More

  • How Does The Indian Removal Act Affect The Nation

    442 Words  | 2 Pages

    READING QUESTIONS Day 128: Native Americans and the New Republic: Q. Why did the Americans want the natives to peacefully conform to their new American ways? A. Q. What did the Indians want to do when the Americans asked them to peacefully conform to their civilized ways? A. The Indians wanted to keep their Indian culture and traditions, while still civilizing themselves.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act Of 1790

    1501 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Andrew Jackson's Problem With The Indian Removal Act

    203 Words  | 1 Pages

    When Andrew Jackson became president in 1829, the Native American condition worsened. Congress allowed the president to solve the "Indian problem" with the Indian Removal Act of 1830 (O’Neill 11). This act gave President Jackson permission to offer tribes land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their tribal lands east of the Mississippi. Politicians of the day considered this a generous offer, (O’Neil 11) but the Native American population would not surrender their homes so easily. So the federal government used some shady tactics in order to get many tribes to accept the agreement.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Jackson And Indian Removal

    519 Words  | 3 Pages

    President Jackson supported the Indian removal with most of the rest of the nation, which he represented, giving him the opportunity to represent the “average” American citizen in the 1800s. Jackson called for the removal of Indians because he, along with the majority of the nation, wanted the United States population to be all white. “One more step toward making the United States a white man’s country.” He wanted more land for the population of the United States to take over, which happened to be the

    Read More

  • The 1830-Indian Removal Act

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    Americans were rather hostile towards Native Americans, partially because of a predisposition of them being savages, but also because they had a tremendous amount of difficulty sharing the land. In 1819 when the US purchased florida, they drove out a tribe who had been living there to escape american authorities and placed them in a reservation in central florida. When Native americans attempted to use US law to fight back (1828 supreme court case, Cherokee Nation vs. Georgia) and won, the president at the time disregarded the ruling and placed the Cherokee in Oklahoma. The last blow came from the 1830 - Indian Removal Act which allowed the president to negotiate with the remaining native americans to move them to the west of the mississippi.

    Read More

  • How Did The Cherokee Removal Act Vs Indian Removal

    1091 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Americans had always felt resentment toward the indigenous people, and they saw property disputes as a way to get rid of Natives entirely. While most Americans liked the idea of removing Native’s, some people strongly opposed it. One such person was Jeremiah Evarts. Under the name of William Penn, Evarts wrote several letters to Congress to try to convince them to not pass the Removal Act. In 1829, Evarts wrote “A Brief View of the Present Relations between the Government and People of the United States and the Indians within Our National Limits.”

    Read More

  • The Indian Removal Act In The 1830's

    726 Words  | 3 Pages

    The dispersing of the Indians, particularly the five civilized tribes of the southwest: Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek and Seminole fairly began before the approval of the Indian Removal Act. As the European-Americans were progressing the procedure of passing the Act was bound to happen. They were once a secluded society and now forced to a loss of war. The Indian Removal Act was signed on 1830 by President Andrew Jackson. The act allowed President Andrew Jackson to provide the states with federal funds to remove the civilized tribes and reject the Indians from letting them to be part of the European-American society.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Expansion

    88 Words  | 1 Pages

    The removal act period was essentially over during 1850, but the expansion continued to the American settlement. The Indian Territory was no longer a place where Native Americans could be isolated and left to their own tools. In the decades introducing the Civil War, the holdings of the relocated Indians were further shorten as the states of Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma were carved out of the lands that had been permanently set aside for American Indian use and occupancy.

    Read More

  • The Indian Removal Act: The Negative Impact On The Native Americans

    1105 Words  | 5 Pages

    When the Europeans began colonizing the New World, they had a problematic relationship with the Native Americans. The Europeans sought to control a land that the Natives inhabited all their lives. They came and decided to take whatever they wanted regardless of how it affected the Native Americans. They legislated several laws, such as the Indian Removal Act, to establish their authority. The Indian Removal Act had a negative impact on the Native Americans because they were driven away from their ancestral homes, forced to adopt a different lifestyle, and their journey westwards caused the deaths of many Native Americans.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act

    1004 Words  | 5 Pages

    Contrary to a popular, exaggerated thought among the settlers in the 1800s—that the West was unoccupied and perfect for settlers to claim—around a quarter million Native Americans inhabited these lands for long periods of time. Some lived there as a result of the Indian Removal Act (1830), where many tribes in the east were forced to walk the “Trail of Tears” and were relocated to present-day Oklahoma. Settlers viewed these groups as potential threats that would interfere with their westward expansion plans. Therefore, they wished for these tribes to be removed from the Great Plains. To accomplish these goals, treaties were created, but eventually, settlers and the local militias, with the support of the federal government, used more violent and drastic methods.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Indian Removal Act And Trail Of Tears

    640 Words  | 3 Pages

    President Jackson and Congress disagreed on the Indian Removal Policy, but Jackson went forward with it anyway. The Indians had fought with the people since the original colonization, and the U.S citizens were usually the aggrovators. The U.S had only had a couple of good relationship years, the rest of the time, there was a large amount of tension and small “wars” between the people and Natives. The U.S and Natives had been under tension for multiple years when Jackson declared the Indian Removal policy. The authors perspective towards the Indian Removal Act and Trail of Tears helped to shape our current understanding by showing how different people can have different views on a topic.

    Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act

Open Document