ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Tyranny

738 Words3 Pages

Tyranny is cruel and dehumanizing to those who are being oppressed. Tyranny can be defined as an unrestrained exercise of power, which leads to an abuse of authority. The United States has always been characterized for having freedom as their main theme in order for their citizens to be able to achieve any dream they might want to pursuit. In 1987, delegates met up to make changed to the Articles of Confederation because they needed a stronger government that could prevent getting one person or group from attaining too much power. They achieved this by forming a new structure consisting of federalism, separation of power, checks and balances, and equality between big and small states. Federalism is a system based upon democratic rules where the power to govern is shared between national and state governments. The delegates agreed to form this set because it would divide the power of the government as a whole in order for neither of the …show more content…

The congress was divided into two parts: the senate and the House of Representatives. When the Articles of Confederation was in action, equal representation did not exist, meaning that the amount of representatives that each house had was based on the states population. This meant that bigger states had more of a voice in making decisions, and that wasn’t fair for the smaller ones. In order to avoid this, the constitution decided that “the number of representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one representative” (Doc D). Also, the Senate was composed by two senators from each state, each one having only one vote. Such system allowed all states to have an equal voice in making decisions that would benefit themselves and the nation as a whole, which guarded the constitution at a complete level from

Open Document