At least once in their life, people make a decision, and grow to eventually regret what they have done and reflect on what could have been done instead. In the passage “The Rattler” the speaker recalls the time when he crosses paths with a snake and has to debate whether to kill the snake. The author invites the reader to feel empathy for the man and sympathy for the snake using the point of view of the man, attitude of the snake, and descriptions of the setting. The author demonstrates empathy for the man through his appreciation for nature, justification for killing the snake, and his remorse after its death. The passage begins with the man walking in the desert when he comes across the snake. As the man crossed paths with the snake his …show more content…
At first, when the man comes near the snake with the hoe, the snake takes action to prove that he will attack in an attempt to defend his life. “His tail twitched… quite sportingly” described the man as the snake “drew back his head”. The snake takes action showing that he recognizes what the man is doing and is ready to fight. The snake is showing that he must defend and ready himself to take part in what is to come. This creates sympathy because the snake is not the one who is there to fight, that the snake is simply there ready to defend himself. The snake is being protective and not offensive towards the man. The snake gave careful warning to the man that he did not want to fight while “He lay there like a live wire … calm watchfulness”. This represents his attitude towards the man, as the snake is showing mercy to the man. It looks as if the snake is the one who is dangerous. The snake had no intention of hurting the man; He was trying to spare the man’s life. Thus, this creates sympathy for the snake because the snake’s attitude makes the audience feel for the snake, that the snake is not the villain. He is showing mercy by being lenient to the man at first. He wants to avoid any upcoming affairs. Finally, the snake also has a sense of cockiness in his attitude, that he is dangerous and he is aware of it, that he is not afraid to use it. He “shook his fair but furious signal” his “little song of death”. The snake sees himself as the boss of the situation. He feels as if he makes the calls on what will happen therefore develops cockiness in his attitude. In the end, details of the snake were given after it was killed. With “blood in his mouth and poison dripping from his fangs” as described by the man once the snake was fully dead. These details were added to show how brutally killed the snake was. Sympathy is created for the snake with the audience to imagine
I thought he was a very nice gentlemen. Soft spoken. I thought so right up to the moment I cut his throat.” It seems ironic that he seemed to like the family which shows his motive was not because of hatred but from misdirected frustration . Which also shows a type of Artistic Measure because they knew the family was a very nice family but they had something else running through their heads or they pictured another turn out
his neck was open to the spinal cord and the blood there was thick and shiny” (O’Brien 118). O’Brien uses the visual imagery to show his horrified response to his actions, as well as gain a response from the reader. O’Brien describes the dead man in so much detail that the readers are able to visualize him and feel the pain that O’Brien felt, which invokes an emotional response and helps prove the novel as very admirable. Finally, O’Brien utilizes conflict in
The story is told from the omniscient first person point of view. The man has come across this snake while he is out on a walk through the desert. Both the man and the snake had no intentions of harming the other at first, “My first instinct was to let him go his way and I would go mine…”. Then the man puts into perspective that he needs to be the protector of the other people that live with him, “But I reflected that there were children, dogs, horses at the ranch, as well as men and women lightly shod; my duty, plainly, was to kill the snake”.
The author also elaborates in detail to show the man does not want to kill the snake- “...the sport in taking life is a satisfaction I can’t feel.” Through the man's conflict, the author intends to show the snake had no dangerous intentions explaining
The snake seems to be put as the victim when Patric describes it as being calm while watching the man. The way Patric uses his words can be interpreted in many different attitudes to whoever is reading it.
How do you cope with the reality of day to day life? I would like to think I handle the reality of day to day life moderately well like everyone else. However, I began to question myself once again as I read Ambrose Bierce’s “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge.” This story, with its unexpected ending, had me rereading it several times to pull out key details that led me down the wrong path the first time.
In a desert, you will find both a rattlesnake and cactus living in the harsh climate with very little rain. A cactus uses its thick skin of the stem with spines to keep unwanted animals from getting to the water that they store away. It uses its large underground root system to find water deep underground even when the topsoil is dry. The cactus also uses its thick stem to hold water to keep it alive.
The water snake is a representative of a dream because of its periscope head preparing for an opportunity to achieve its goal. The heron portrays fate because it takes the water snake by its head to kill it instantly and unexpectedly, like fate crushes dreams. The incident with the heron and the snake foreshadows Lennie’s fate, which is also instant and unexpected. Curley’s wife is like the periscope head, preparing for an opportunity to become an actress, until Lennie started petting her hair and killed her. Lennie’s actions were similar to the actions of the heron and the actions of fate.
The demonstration of the narrator's imagination unconsciously leads his own thoughts to grow into a chaotic mess that ultimately ends in a death. By murdering, it’s his own way of finding peace. He is portrayed as being a sadist, sick man with an unnatural obsession for
In conclusion the authors use of rhetorical strategy shows that he/she was justified in killing the rattlesnake; s/he did it to save the lives of someone who could've been hurt in the future-- by this virulent
Individuals can make their own interpretation of the themes of the short story, but without the grotesque violence and psychopathic nature of the characters, a theme would never surface. The purpose of the violent scenes and nature of the story is to provide a theme for the audience that a good man is not just hard to find but impossible to find because everyone is an imperfect human by human
The reader awaits, hoping that the good in him will overcome or that there could be a better ending for him besides a broken neck. Protagonists are not always the hero, and protagonists do not always
Although this large, frightening snake is ultimately feared, and also causes the death of a young character in the novel, its is a symbol of the spirit of the jungle. After Ruth May’s sudden and tragic death, it suggests in the novel that she becomes the trees of the vast jungle watching over everyone. In the final chapter of the story it says “I forgive you, Mother. I shall turn the hearts of the fathers to the children and the hearts of the children to their fathers” (Kingsolver 543). This quotes gives us reason to believe that it is Ruth May that is narrating this final passage, and that she has become the trees and is now apart of
Snakes Slithering into Poetry Snakes are known for their intelligence and intense protective personality. They work hard to capture prey, protect themselves, and not stand for any nonsense. Centralized on the struggle of a waitress, “Ella, In a Square Apron, Along Highway 80” by Judy Grahn, compares the tough lifestyle of a protective single mother to that of a protective snake in the wilderness with analogies and free verse style. The poem tells a heart-wrenching story of a hardworking mother trying to protect her child and herself from the misfortune in the world and getting destroyed in the end for her attempts.
The concept of “The Hero’s Journey” plays a major role in nearly every piece of fiction humanity has created since its inception, from epic poems to blockbuster movies. In many ways, works of fiction and some pieces of nonfiction could not exist and would not make sense without the concept of a Hero’s Journey; it allows the reader to comprehend and follow the progression of characters over the course of the story. While Cormac McCarthy’s novel The Road may not display most of the archetypal qualities found in classic Hero’s Journeys such as J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit or Homer’s Odyssey and Iliad, it most clearly exemplifies the qualities of a Hero’s Journey through the Boy’s character in relation to the mentor, tests and enemies, and the