The right to read is a fundamental right that should be protected and respected by the government. It is essential that citizens, including children and students, have access to diverse sources of information and are free to choose what they want to read. However, there have been attempts by the government to limit what citizens can read, which raises serious concerns about personal freedom and censorship. In this essay, I will argue that the government should not be allowed to limit what citizens read, that citizens' rights in reading extend to children, and why students in school should have rights to what they read.
Farenheit 451, written by Ray Bradbury, is a classic novel that serves as a cautionary tale of a dystopian society where books
…show more content…
This is a dangerous scenario, as it limits citizens' ability to make informed decisions and think critically about the world around them. In a free and democratic society, it is essential that citizens have access to diverse sources of information so they can make informed decisions and participate fully in the political process.
The right to read extends to children and students as well. Children and students should have access to a variety of books and other forms of written expression so they can learn and grow. By limiting what children and students can read, the government is also limiting their education and opportunities for personal growth. Children and students should have the right to choose what they want to read and explore new ideas, and they should not be denied access to information and knowledge because of government censorship.
The government's attempt to limit what students can read in schools is also a threat to their education and personal freedom. Schools should provide students with access to diverse sources of information and encourage them to explore new ideas and perspectives. By limiting what students can read, the government is also limiting their ability to develop critical thinking skills and make informed decisions in the
While Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 may be a work of fiction, its message is one that is relevant to our modern world, surrounded by technology and control. The novel describes a society where books are banned and conformity is the norm. Instead of books, people indulge in mindless leisure activities that revolve around technology. Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 is a chilling dystopian tale that explores the dangers of censorship and the importance of preserving knowledge and individualism. The main character, Guy Montag undergoes a mental rebirth, beginning to understand that the “happy” world he lives in is simply kept this way to keep control.
Without giving children the choice to choose what they want to read and learn about causes them to not grow
Censorship sciences minorities. In the article entitled “Reading, Writing and Censorship: When Good Books Can Get Schools in Trouble”. Barbara Miner remarks “The Bill of Rights protects not only freedom of speech, but the right to petition the government for the redress of grievances…”. When a minority
The right to read is a fundamental right that the government should protect and respect. Citizens, including children and students, must have access to a variety of information sources and the freedom to choose what they want to read. However, the government has attempted to limit what citizens can read, raising serious concerns about personal freedom and censorship. In this essay, I will argue that the government should not be permitted to limit what citizens read, that citizens' reading rights extend to children, and that students in school should have rights to what they read. Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 is a classic novel that serves as a cautionary tale of a dystopian society, where books are banned and burned by the government.
Commonly, when the argument of censorship comes up, people fail to mention that students’ rights are being violated. Just like adults, students are human too, and deserve to be treated the same; due to that reason, banning books and media becomes questionable, "The removal of books from public schools libraries involves questions of free speech, because the right to receive expression goes hand in hand with the right to speak freely under the first amendment of the constitution” (Tylor). Although
Novels are filled with lessons vital to a developing brain, due to their ability to teach caution and create experiences. In summation, the fallacious act of banning books from students and others willing to learn is utterly
Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.
When censoring your own child’s school life, it can also have a great impact on the lives of other students. Choosing to remove content from schools and libraries takes the material from all students and children who can learn and benefit from the stories, not only that one child. Within the article “How Banning Books Marginalizes Children”, Ringel discusses the way in which literature written for younger children is more often aimed to please prospective parents and administrators instead of the intended audience of young minds. Accordingly, emphasizing the point that when literature does bring forward diverse subjects, issues one may likely experience in real life, to intrigue and educate young readers, authority figures will deem this content inappropriate, taking away its accessibility.
At one point in time, over 7,220 books have been challenged to be banned. Though these books have been removed for the safety of children, not all books should be banned for many reasons. These include the fact that banning books is infringing on the First Amendment, keeping children from understanding the real world, and, even though there are many reasons for book banning, not banning books could help a student’s education and can even work against itself. Banning a book from a school or public library could go against a person’s First Amendment of the freedom of press.
Children just like us have a mind of their own and should be able to make their own decisions by themselves to either pick up the book or to leave it alone. Censorship does not exist in public places such as stores even though children enter stores everyday these kids have learned the decency of what they should or should not do they learned what they want and what they do not want what they like and what they do not like that should be a reason that children should be able to make censorship their choice.
Books should not be banned from schools and libraries, everyone should be allowed to be informed on what’s happening in the world and learn about diversity, despite a book having unpopular views. Opponents claim that all books should be monitored and banned if they give off unpopular opinion or can possibly hurt the public. 1.) One
“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.
Intro 1: What if your young child is looking through a book at your public library and comes across a topic that was way too mature for their mind set. Would you be okay with it? A big controversial issue that has been going on in the past year is if books should be banned. Now, no one is trying to banish libraries across the globe but people have requested to ban books that are inappropriate. This matter has grown to be worse because everyone has an opinion.
The government is constantly attempting to take total control over society and its citizens, by regulating what is available, what can and cannot be done, and more. In America, it is believed that the citizens ' First Amendment right to freedom of religion, assembly, press, petition, and speech protects them from being able to be censored by the government and other figures with authority, but that is incorrect. The federal government has censored press on various occasions throughout history, contemporary censorship is practiced in non-governmental organizations and corporations, and in schools, as well as public libraries, books are continuously challenged in hopes of them being removed or banned. Censorship, and the government taking total control of what readers can and cannot read is a danger to society because censorship places limitations on the knowledge and creativity of citizens, hinders their right to freedom of expression, and shelters citizens from the harsh realities that are present in today 's world. Censorship places limitations on the knowledge and creativity of citizens.
“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.