Animals, on the other hand, lack this mental capacity. As Baird put it "it's impossible for them, in principle, to give or withhold voluntary consent or to make a moral choice" (106). Perhaps these arguments, or defenses may not be enough to sway or convince someone that animals should be used or at least to tolerate the usage of animals here in there in testing for the benefit of mankind. But what can not be disputed it studies and facts which are also used in order to defend the postion of an advocate for the use of animals in testing and
' Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: 'Because the animals are not like us. '”. This contradiction reflects how hypocritical experimenters are towards animals. Many of us tend to place the value of an animal on how similar they are in physical appearance and how similar we see an animal to ourselves not by how they contribute to the Earth. Animals are keeping us alive this very second, we would cease to exist without them but they would flourish without us.
It is true that animals cannot talk nor make decision. Yet, people still can think rationally that none of these god’s creature willingly or voluntarily sacrifice themselves for the advancement of human welfare and new technology. Humans do not have the right to use animals for their own ends because animals are also a creation of god which makes them equally entitled to the same rights as humans. According to Bentham (2015), the questions that bothers when deciding on animal are not ‘Can they reason?’ nor ‘Can they talk?’ but ‘Can they suffer?’ Animals have the same ability to suffer as human do. The absent of cognitive ability, language, or moral judgement cannot become the reasons why they should be discriminated (Singer, 2009).
Argumentative essay: Experimenting on animals, with or against? Since many years, animals have always been one of the reasons for the survival of many human beings. They are used for experimental and medical research for finding new drugs and treatments and for the general advancement of health and medicine. There has been a controversy between animal rights supporters and scientists about the pros and cons to the practice of animal testing and whether it is helpful or it is just wasting the animal lives and there could be alternatives. First of all, the scientific community and many other people support the use of animals because it helped in the discovery of new drugs and treatments to various diseases and lead to the improvement of human health in many ways.
Arguments against animal consciousness have been resurfacing. One method of arguing against the claim that animals are conscious is to point to the flaws of arguments purporting to claim that animals are conscious. For example, Peter Harrison has recently argued that the Argument from Analogy, one of the most common arguments for the claim that animals are conscious, is hopelessly flawed. The Argument from Analogy relies on the similarities between animals and human beings in order to support the claim that animals are conscious. The similarities usually cited by proponents of this argument are similarities in behaviour, similarities in physical structures, and similarities in relative positions on the evolutionary scale.
This encouraged the readers to approach this matter not with the heads, but with hearts, changing the perception of animals not as a mere inferior creature, but as a being of intellect and feelings as humans. Although the author revealed his unsatisfaction toward mechanistic interpretation, he approaches his argument in a scientific way to counter his audience, who may still disagree with him based on the scientific fact of superiority in intelligent of humans over the animals.
We are not alone on this Earth. We, humans, have animals by our side. We share this inhabitable planet together with animals, and they should have same right as we do on this beautiful planet. Animals are pure instinctual living creatures who never think before following their instincts. They won’t think otherwise before killing a person.
Being the most advanced animal on Earth, humans often neglect the fact that we are too classified as animals, along with a multitude of others. People find animals fascinating; we keep many different species as pets and frequent zoos to stare at them as they lay around doing nothing, but nonetheless we find it entertaining. In recent years, a more debatable conversation has sparked about whether animals are conscious beings and capable of complex emotions and tasks. New evidence has been researched, making people change their old views, or sometimes making them stick to their guns even more. Animals have conscious minds that enable them to experience their surroundings in various ways, can think and feel emotions, and can solve problems they face in life.
Do Animals Have Rights? Yes, indeed, animals have the rights to live free from sorrow. Us as Muslims, Allah command us in the Holly Qur’an and Sunnah to treat animals with mercy and compassion (AlAhmad). Abd Allah bin Jafar said: The Apostle of Allaah (ﷺ) seated me behind him (on his ride) one day, and told me secretly a thing asking me not to tell it to anyone. The place for easing dearer to the Apostle of Allaah (ﷺ) was a mound or host of palm trees by which he could conceal himself.
Animals help us with a lot more than we think they do. Animals help us with things people can’t begin to imagine. Animals are beneficial to our mental and physical health in many ways. Having a pet is beneficial to humans in general. “Pets provide unconditional love and acceptance and may be part of answers to social problems,