Although the successes and triumphs of empires in history cannot be overlooked, even the greatest of them have fallen; namely, the British Commonwealth, the Persian Empire, and even the Roman Empire. The mentioned empires and more have made monumental and pivotal contributions to society; even now many can still see some of the influences that they made. At their acme, many, if not all, were large and powerful. However, in the end, even the greatest made crucial mistakes and suffered the consequences.
These errors varied from committing the fatal sin of hubris to just not having the right leader in charge. Because of the faults that they made, these empires were eventually eaten up by corruption, war, and rebellion. The question is: can one create a lasting, benevolent empire?
…show more content…
As Marcus Aurelius, the last of the Five Good Emperors of Rome, once stated, “Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future, too” (Aurelius). History sets a precedent for empires; successful and prosperous in the beginning, but even the greatest will see deterioration in their almost perfect system. Take the Mongol empire for example. When Genghis Khan unified the clans to create formidable army, the Mongols were unstoppable. Within 100 years, the Mongol empire became the biggest in the world, even reaching all the way to the outskirts of Europe. Nonetheless, after Genghis Khan passed away, a flaw in the political system led to the deterioration of this great
Andrea Gavin Mrs. Fox History Oct 06, 2017 Fall of Classical Empires The Han dynasty and the Western Roman empire have many reasons of why they fell. Powerful and strong these empires were, but just like any other empire they had their similarities and differences, that caused their fall. One of their similarities was invasions by barbarian tribes.
The empires of the classical era have many similar characteristics, but they also had many defining qualities. For example, Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E-220 C.E.) have utilized their methods of political control in various ways. These two empires had similar methods of political control concerning defense. Other methods of political control were different in the sense of how they conducted their society within the empires. Methods of political control in imperial rome and Han China were similar in the sense that both empire defense systems were weak and fragmented which later led to the collapse of central governments.
Most always, in order for something to fail, a chain of events must occur first. The Founding Fathers of the United States created amendments, the Bill of Rights, Checks and Balances;and many more programs to adhere to the order and avoid any type of collapse internally. In a thriving civilization and more specifically; an empire, one of the most important elemental makeup is the economy. Without a solid economy-a civilization whether large or small could never thrive.
Although they may not share some characteristics of ancient empires, they still received a
All the great empires , most notably the Byzantine and Mongols were all defeated after enjoying long periods of success. Mongols were successful because they were interacting with many countries because of their conquests. Conquering others allowed the trade routes in Asia to move north. All these great countries and civilizations were so successful , mostly in part that they all worked together and their ideas spread to one another.
The legendary Roman Empire lasted from 753 B.C.E. all the way until 1453 A.D. However Rome split in two at about 395 A.D. which crippled the ancient Rome we know. So really ancient Rome lived from 753 B.C.E. to 476 A.D. But the name of Rome continued on in the Byzantine empire for about another 1000 years. Yet many people nowadays still refer to Rome as one of the greatest ancient civilizations of all time.
The early modern era was a time when empires thrived across the globe. The Western Europeans were not the only ones to construct successful empires either. The Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman empires added to this phenomenon. Although these empires share many similarities, they also have their differences. During the time, 1450 CE -1750 CE, European empires in the Americas and their Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman counterparts are similar in that they all thrived and united diverse peoples and different in that European empires developed something entirely new, an interacting Atlantic World, while the other empires continued older patterns of historical development.
All empires in history had a high in their history but they all eventually came to their demise. The Ottoman Empire and the Ming Dynasty both had ways they gained, consolidated and maintained their power while they were at their highest point. They had significant leaders that lead to these successful points. The Ottoman Empire covered parts of Asia, Europe and Africa controlled by their leader named Suleiman.
Throughout history, many impactful and memorable empires have arisen. Each empire has its own defining traits that lead to its success or demise. Some empires are very similar, while some posses many different traits. And although some can possess the same quality, their implication and utilization of that quality can create many gaps in the empire’s overall similarity to the other. Two powerful and historically important empires are the Ottoman empire, and the Mughal empire.
Unit 1 Essay Governments back in 1450-1750 CE was governed by successful emperors and some were governed by some emperors that ran the empire into complete disaster and chaos. There was two successful empires though that made history, it was the Ottoman Empire and the Mughal Empire with their systems that help them stabilize, centralize and maintain control. Both empires had great powerful emperors that lead the empire to Success! The Mughal Empire lasted between the 1526-1858 with some great emperors that were able to maintain their control.
World leaders hold the power to shape the course of human history, and two of the most significant empires to ever exist were the Roman and Mongol empires. Augustus Caesar, the leader of the Roman Empire was born in 63 BCE; Genghis Khan, the leader of the Mongol Empire, was born in 1162. Though born ages apart, they were both effective leaders who established expansive empires and while there is no arguing against their ability to lead such empires, a question remains; what qualities made them such excellent rulers, and which ruler created a more stable empire? Each empire held immense power for many years, but because of the difference in the long-term stability of their respective empires, Augustus must be the superior leader.
The Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal empires were very powerful and well respected in their time. Their rise was attributed to their strong military presence, trade and economic gain, religious tolerance and ideology that rulers should be chosen by ability not class or wealth. Their falls were due to indecent economic dealings, religious suppression, surrounding empires, mistreatment of citizens and an unfortunate series of terrible rulers. The rise of the Ottoman Empire was caused by a few factors including location, a strong military, a strong leader and religious tolerance.
The Mongol Empire contributed both good and bad impacts to the world. Focusing on the positives of the Mongol Empire Invictus points out how they shaped a thriving economy through increasing trade and their ability to share knowledge with others. Empires typically do not appear as quickly and thrive as well as the Mongol Empire did, but they grew from a few men to a large group of warriors overnight or within eighty years (Invictus). The ruler Chingis Khan made it possible through his unity, military tactics, and personal skills. Chingis Khan developed a new system of fighting that created stability and organization within his army, most foes feared them because of this basic principle (Invictus).
This is exemplified by the largest land-based power known to man: the Mongol empire. They were ruled by Genghis Khan who had around one hundred thousand well-trained warriors. Together, they fought to conquer more land in order to expand their strong empire. At first, they conquered small, minor territories to gain soldiers and more wealth. However, as time went on, the Mongol empire became extremely avaricious.
Qin Shi Huangdi and Caesar Augustus’s domination of multiple empires during their different lifetimes is what lead to them gaining the title of the first emperor of their empires. With peace finally brought to their territories, they gained supreme power over all. Their commitment to honoring their title showed by the way they appealed to the people. But, having great power was a substantial responsibility. They constantly had to show dedication to their empires, so the people never doubted why they were in power.