ipl-logo

The Role Of Prorogation In Canada

1581 Words7 Pages

Prorogation is much like a complex acronym to Canadians. We understand that it conveys meaning in some way, yet the majority of us are not familiar with the term. Developed during the Tudor period, prorogation is a healthy alternative to dissolution; however, today prorogation is a process that once approved by the Governor General, the acting Prime Minister may cease the current parliamentary session, effectively clearing the parliamentary agenda and ending proceedings for a set period of time. In recent years there has been a growing controversy in relation to prorogation in Canada. This is largely due to the 2008-2009 parliamentary disputes between the Conservative minority government and the opposition governments; however, that is addressed …show more content…

On October 15, 2012 the Ontario Legislature implemented prorogation at the request of the minority government’s Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty. Liberal House Leader John Milloy claimed McGuinty requested prorogation due to labour leaders reaching an impasse with the opposition government over plans to freeze public sector wages. On the contrary, the opposition claimed that the prorogation was intended to draw attention away from the investigation into the Ornge Air affair, as well as growing controversy regarding the decision to halt construction of 2 gas-fired power plants. In addition to these allegations the opposition also threatened to hold Cabinet ministers in contempt of Parliament for withholding information from legislature regarding the projects. [ ][ …show more content…

Our current laws are not strict enough on our government if loopholes such as this exist. We elect our government to rule, regulate and act in the interest of Canadians, yet Harper was able to disregard the interest of Canadians and prorogue parliament for his government’s own partisan reasons. Six years later, nothing is done to ensure prorogation is not again used in such a partisan way. In analysis we also run into the issue that the Governor General plays an integral part in the prorogation process. The ability to end a parliamentary session is too much power for an individual that Canadians cannot keep responsible. That being said, we need a regulation that withholds the GG from making prorogation decisions, or something has to be implemented to considerably lessen their power. As stated prior, I believe reforming the law surrounding prorogation is the answer to this problem. A system in which we require two-thirds of the HOC to agree the prorogation is necessary will not only ensure it is not used for partisan reasons, but also lessen the power that the Prime Minister and the Governor General hold in the prorogation process. While this new rule may not have prevented the 2008-2009 prorogation, due to the opposition not garnering two thirds of the seats in the HOC (163-143 ) it is certainly a step in the right direction to limiting the power of the PM and the

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of The Second Session Of The Provincial Congress

275 Words | 2 Pages

With many losses to secure a stronghold in the provincial Congress the Patriot cause has been at a disadvantage. The Second Session of the Provincial Congress the petition to re-open the courts passed however it is under British rule. The very first act to not be in favor or help the patriot cause. Opening the courts under British rule will make passing laws and creating a new system more difficult. Americans wanting freedom from the British rule must take even more dangerous actions by way of mobs and a large amount of sacrifice the possibility of sending our men and sons to war to enable the Patriots a victory over his Majesty’s tyrannical ways.

Read More

How Did Richard Bennett Occupy The Streets Of Canada

597 Words | 3 Pages

An example of Federal governments making it difficult for provincial governments would be when the Federal government challenged Premier Dufferin Pattullo’s authority. He had introduced reforms to shorten the workday,increase minimum wage and increase relief payments, he also attempted to introduce many projects into BC. However, the federal government challenged his authority and didn’t allow him to carry out those

Read More

How Did Pierre Trudeau Affect Canada

755 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout Canadian history, Canada had always been socially divided. Between the English speaking majority and the French speaking majority. One of Trudeau’s main objective was to erase this separation between these two parties. Firstly, in order to ease tension between the French speaking majority, Trudeau placed a “Official Language Act” in 1969 . This was the first act that English and French the

Read More

Essay On Triple E Senate Reform

1111 Words | 5 Pages

When looking at the current state of Senate in Canada today, many provincial governments are unhappy with their position in parliament and how their voices are being heard in the federal government. Senate reform has been a popular topic for over 60 years, with minimal changes toward how Senate has been run since the Constitution amendment in 1982. Originally, the Senate was to be a platform where regional representation was shown at the national level, and at its creation was credited with three main duties: to give proper representation of the regions of Canada, to be a ‘sober second thought’ for the House of Commons legislation, and to represent the population for Canadian interests. Many view that these duties are not being properly done by the current senate and have in many

Read More

Re Senate Reform Analysis

1604 Words | 7 Pages

This means that if the legislature can abolish of change the nature of the Senate in such a way that there is an imbalance in the check and balances of the Canadian political system then this power is weak and without effect. Thus, this paper will examine the response of the Supreme Court to these questions, in order to determine how it interprets the power of the legislature and the role of the Senate within Canadian politics. It will do this by examining the primary text alone and any case law examined by the Supreme Court in this

Read More

Advantages Of The Centralization Of Canadian Federation

1128 Words | 5 Pages

The level of centralization in the Canadian federation has greatly fluctuated since its formation in 1867 with the enactment of the British North America Act (*). At its beginning, the level of centralization and the amount of power in the hands of the federal government raised questions on whether or not Canada could even be considered a federation (*). Over time, a tendency towards decentralization emerged and changes to the application of the Constitution lead to more powers being shared across the provincial governments (*). Nowadays, it is widely believed that the Canadian federation is one of the most decentralized federations in the world. (https://lop.parl.ca/About/Parliament/senatoreugeneforsey/book/chapter_4-e.html).

Read More

Argumentative Essay: We Should Keep The Senate In Canada

875 Words | 4 Pages

The Senate: “The upper chamber of Parliament where there are 105 members who are appointed until age 75 by the Crown on the advice if the prime minister.” (Rules of the Game pg 106)The original Senate that was created in 1867 had only originally 72 seats. It was created to counter balance representation population in the House of Commons, although in recent years the Senate has become to reinforce representation of groups that have often been underrepresented in parliament, examples; Aboriginals, visible minorities and women. There has been a huge debate’s on whether Canada should keep the Senate. The people all over Canada have mixed opinions on if we should keep the Senate or not.

Read More

The Role Of Prorogation In Canada

1476 Words | 6 Pages

Prorogation is much like a complex acronym to Canadians. We understand that it conveys meaning in some way, yet majority of us are not familiar with the term. Prorogation was originally developed during the Tudor period as a healthy alternative to dissolution; however, today prorogation is a process that once approved by the Governor General, the acting Prime Minister may cease the current parliamentary session, effectively clearing the parliamentary agenda and ending proceedings for a set period of time. In recent years there has been a growing controversy in relation to prorogation in Canada. This is largely due to the 2008-2009 parliamentary disputes between the Conservative minority government and the opposition governments; however, that

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Monarchy In Canada

564 Words | 3 Pages

The monarchy in Canada is a continuous debate among the politicians and individuals. This paper aims to present the advantages and disadvantages of the monarchy in Canada. This way will enable us to take a clear position. First, Canadian politics are known for their divisive attitudes, and it is very hard to get consensus on decisions. The Queen plays the role of reference for the Canadian politicians and their decisions.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Canada Senate

1949 Words | 8 Pages

The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.

Read More

Analysis Of Emily Murphy's Case: A Defining Moment For Canada

1526 Words | 7 Pages

While Murphy’s sentence as magistrate was upheld by the Supreme Court of Alberta, she became inspired to campaign

Read More

Argument In Relation To Prorogation In Canada

1686 Words | 7 Pages

Prorogation is much alike a complex acronym to Canadians. We understand that it conveys meaning in some way, yet the majority of us are not familiar with the term. Developed during the Tudor period, prorogation is a healthy alternative to dissolution; however, today prorogation is a process that once approved by the Governor General, the acting Prime Minister may cease the current parliamentary session, effectively clearing the parliamentary agenda and ending proceedings for a set period of time. In recent years there has been a growing controversy in relation to prorogation in Canada. This is largely due to the 2008-2009 parliamentary disputes between the Conservative minority government and the opposition governments; however, that is addressed later on.

Read More

Pierre Trudeau Federalism

1515 Words | 7 Pages

Institutional and historical analysis often portray the motives of governments, especially in the cases of Quebec separatism and Aboriginal mistreatment. History describes attempts at compromise to rectify the problems by altering political institutions to provide more autonomy to the provinces, witness in various accords and the methods described previously. However, in regards to Aboriginals a historical relationship of exploitation and eradication sheds on the systemic issues that Aboriginals cope with and the institutions that caused them. As scholars of Canadian politics, it is important to consider historical and institutional analyses when looking at any issue, as it reveals the underlying motives of actors in regards to the cleavages that comprise a state.

Read More

War Measures Act Essay

1064 Words | 5 Pages

There are many takes on what occurred during the October crisis, and many untold stories. Each tale gives a new puzzle to understand what really happened. Prime Minster Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s decsion remains a controversy to this day with many opposing it, and some justifying it was the right thing to do. After a while, the War Measures Act was eventually replaced by the Emergency Act in 1988.

Read More

Differences Between Parliamentary Sovereignty And Constitutional Supremacy

1071 Words | 5 Pages

Differences between Parliamentary sovereignty and Constitutional supremacy The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty of the United Kingdom parliament is often presented as a unique legal arrangement without parallels in comparative constitutional law. By giving unconditional power to the Westminster Parliament, it appears to rule out any comparison between the Westminster Parliament and the United States Congress or the Malaysian Constitution, whose powers are carefully limited by their respective constitutions. Parliamentary sovereignty is thus seen as a unique feature and a result of the unwritten constitution. If parliamentary sovereignty is to be a legal doctrine, it must rely on a list of powers that belong to parliament as an institution. These legal powers are organised in powers and disabilities and are thus both empowering and limiting.

Read More

More about The Role Of Prorogation In Canada

Related Topics

Open Document