A. Organizational Change
There are several studies about why and how organization change but what constitutes change is often left out.22 Organization change is an inside issue within an organization. It can be theory, management or accounting. An organization is defines as a purposeful coordination of people and the activities they undergo to reach a shared and common objectives or goals.21 Change happens when there is an alteration in the status quo. The other definition of change is when the new state of things is different from the old state of things. Therefore, organizational change involves a situation that initiate a different state of things created parallel to the goal-oriented coordination of people in an organization. The purpose
…show more content…
It domains the discipline of organizational development. It is always featured in discussions of organizational behaviour and organization theory throughout their respective histories. The organizational change that we are discussing in this study relates to an organization-wide change that includes a change in mission, restructuring operations, mergers, new technologies, new system or program, re-engineering, etc. It is comparable to organizational transformation. This designates a fundamental and radical re-orientation in terms of organization’s operation. Successful change must involve the highest management. In most cases, a champion will lead the pack to instigate change through his vision, persuasion, and consistence. The role of the change agent is to translate the vision into a realistic plan and execute the plan. Change is best carried out as a team-wide effort. A consistent communication with all the members should be carried out. The organizational structure should be modified in order to sustain change. This also includes strategic plans, policies and …show more content…
However, any project that calls for behavioural change can be daunting and complex. Behaviour is influences by factors that play an important role such as culture, rewards, recognition, incentives, and established norms. Since organizational change is people changing, it involves behavioural changes as well. This means that it involves people doing differently. Change should be aimed at stakeholder engagement, employee involvement and communication. Industrial psychologist is usually invited on the initial change planning to integrate behavioural change in the management. A good practice is to develop a structured change management plan to address both the hearts and minds of employees on the entire hierarchy, according to Bickford.8 The “minds” that Bickford mention among other things included is addressing the contextual elements that reinforce the desired behaviours e.g. management forums, organizational structure and responsibilities, metrics, and incentive compensation. The “heart” includes aligning leaders to speak with one voice, and maintain morale overtime in the face of unavoidable challenges during the actual execution. In addition, this also includes helping stakeholders to understand what the change means for
This is experienced as a result of the desire to maintain status quo. In some organizations, a minor change to the responsibilities of the organizations requires much time and resources (Want, 2006). Change can lead to conflict. Individuals become attached to things they consider as the norm of their workplace. When change occurs the employees have difficulty of letting go of the status qou.
For me to be a good change agent, I would bring my talent of being understanding. I would be understanding of every situation, and allow my sensitivity to shine through. To be a change agent that will make a difference, I would bring my talent of being authentic, and going with how I feel. I would want to provide the best for everyone, and would love to change things for the
For the purpose of
In a HIMSS article by Claire McCarthy, the Director of Organizational Effectiveness for Kaiser, she talks more about the actual thinking and application of Kaiser’s change management strategies. She breaks it down into three steps. First is understanding what change management is for the organization and informing staff (Change Management 101 - Getting Started, 2011). Secondly is ensuring the leaders of the organization are held responsible for facilitating the staff and the outcomes they produce (Change Management 101 - Getting Started, 2011). Lastly, is to engage the stake holders and establish a clear reinforcement plan for bring the change into fruition (Change Management
This structure will still remain mainly functional but with a more flexible and adaptable system that will allow the company to focus on a project as well as the day to day running of the business. The company is expanding, they have added two new directors to the company’s structure to support this expansion. Kathryn Hannah will be promoted to Director of Organizational Development. Kathryn will be responsible for the change process and she will continue to run the HR department but will take the burden of directive control away from Laura Bolton, leaving Laura to focus on the purchasing department. Sidra Aktar will be joining the company as the new Marketing Director.
Powered by Research paper on models of change management 1 Research paper on models of change management Shireesha Muthaluru Under the guidance of Prof. Antala atul Course Period:-01/13/2015 to 02/24/2015 Submission Date: 02/03/2015 Wilmington University Research paper on models of change management 2 Abstract The research paper presents importance of models change in change management and an alternative way of thinking about technological change in organizations. The Information technology is the process of planning, developing, implementing or managing computer or electronic based applications.
Introduction A company’s success is measured by how well it is structured and organized in order to adapt to the changes in environment as well as the changes within itself such as the company’s scale, employees, product scope, etc. Having a suitable, well-structured organizational frame will not only increase the chance of being success but also prolong the company’s lifespan compared to an un-structured one. It is important to note that an organization’s structure needs to fit in with the current situation and does not necessarily required remain unchanged over time. Taking Dynacorp as an example, even though its functional structure contributed to the vast growth of the company at the start, its limitation in dealing with the changes within
The change agent will be the nurse manager in the department, and the task at this stage will be to make others see the need for change, and also to assess the readiness for change within the
Abstract The strategic change cycle is one of the processes within strategic planning. This cycle is a ten-step process created to assist organizations in meeting their mandates, satisfying their missions, and constructing public value. “Strategic planning is intended to enhance an organization’s ability to think, act, and learn strategically” (Bryson & Alston, 2011). Introduction Strategic planning is “a deliberate, disciplined effort to produce fundamental decisions and actions that shape and guide what an organization (or other Entity) is, what it does, and why it does it” (Bryson & Alston, 2011).
1. Introduction 1.1 Overview of the company “UPS” United Parcel Service of North America, mainly known and brand-named as UPS was founded in 1907. In 1907, there was a big necessity in United States of America for personal messenger, delivery and transportation services. To accomplish this need a 19-year-old James E. Casey established the American Messenger Company in Seattle. In 1919 the company adopted its present name, United Parcel Service.
Hence, leaders need to be prepared and manage readiness to the alteration by making an environment of honesty and transparency for their team as a successful implementation of the change is unlikely. Employees must be part of the change hence, they must to be told about the requirement of the change and be given a reward to motivate to embrace the change. If change be accepted by all recipients it can be implemented quickly and effectively. The leaders’ attitudes and behaviors have both positive and negative alterations on the change success. Therefore, leaders of organizations need to try and develop a more framing and shaping behavior, adding skills on themselves to change and motivate the subordinates towards the embracing the change.
The program can proceed if all agents pivotal to the success of the change are engaged and a clear and concise vision for the future has been developed. Once the change model is in place, it is time to define the structure of change. Senior leaders should provide a clear path for communications and responsibility at each level. At this point I have realised that Change management is not an alternative to project management.
Emergent strategy When change happens, an organization changes its strategy, which in turn, changes its structure, organizational culture, recruitment standards and etc. It indicates that strategy process is part of change process. As mentioned before, most change initiatives fail, no least because not engaging all employees in the process towards change (Stanleigh, 2008). We suggest that emergent strategy is a central part of successful change. One reason for this being that the foundation of emergent strategy is to involve more people in strategy making process (Mintzberg et al., 1988).