What if language was identical with thought, could we still think without a language? The relationship between language and thought and the relationship between language and culture are something depends on the individual particularly. For me, the relationship between language and thought is merely possible to be affected by each other. While language is dependent on thought and thought is not dependent on language, it can be proven that language and thought are not interdependent. As I mentioned above, language is just a tool in assisting the thought.
When there exist different cultural principles in relation to the institution, in my project the school, it can be problematic for people to fit in. On the “semiotics of dominance”, Gal adds that different ideologies lead to a confrontation of realities. So, different views on what language means will occur. The social positions play hereby a central role. When taking a closer look at language ideologies, it becomes remarkable that there is a multiplicity of them, that fact is important in theory when drawing comparisons to earlier studies (S&W&K 1998: 320).
Obviously, every speaker of a language has mastered and internalized a generative grammar that expresses his knowledge of his language. This is not say that he is aware of the rules of grammar or even that he can become aware of them or that this statement about his intuitive knowledge of the language are necessarily accurate”(Chomsky,A( 1965) Theory in Syntax). As it could be observed in the previous paragraphs is clear the main difference between those approaches. Moreover another important feature that distinguishes both is the study of language. In Structuralism is noticed that language is analysed syntactically like a structure, in order to link each element in a structural manner, therefore the study of the language is done in a specific manner.
(Skinner,1957,as cited in Shaffer,et.al,2002). This theory explains that the language starts on what they see or hear, the children will imitate what they see on their parents or the people around them. The guardian or the parents will reinforce the students and give them punishment so the children or the students will develop themselves. Interactionist Theory . Interactionists argue that language development is both biological and social.
Communication is power: This has a lot to do with discretion. Power comes in many forms such as politics, economic and culture. It has to do with what we decide to say and what we decide not to say. Our moral values have a lot to do with what we decide to say and what we decide not to say. For example, this girl in my class last year, she said that this one girl isn’t intelligent and needs a personality.
Chomsky’s theory of nativism argues Skinner’s theory of behaviorism, as he believed that a child does not have to be taught a language but there are structures of the brain that control the production of speech. He believed each child is born with ‘Universal Grammar’ and as long as they were in the presence of another producing speech that they too would also begin to acquire language naturally, which provides that Chomsky’s theory, unlike Skinners, is that he believes that language is acquired through nature rather than nurture. He believed that regardless of whether the child was rewarded or not for producing speech they would acquire the language eventually without positive or negative reinforcement from the child’s
It is ideal for those places that experience snow from time to time. In addition, this flooring is known to reflect light. It is also more durable compared to other kinds of flooring. This flooring requires little maintenance. This means that it can help you save money.
Roger Brown has drawn a distinction between weak linguistic relativity, where language limits thought, and strong linguistic relativity, where language determines thought. The idea that linguistic structure influences the cognition of language users has bearings on the fields of anthropological linguistics, psychology, psycholinguistics, neurolinguistics, cognitive science, linguistic anthropology, sociology of language and philosophy of language, and it has been the subject of extensive studies in all of these fields. The idea of linguistic influences on thought has also captivated the minds of authors and creative artists inspiring numerous ideas in literature, in the creation of artificial languages and even forms of therapy such as neuro-linguistic
Knowledge, attitudes, ideology. It also can reflect social condition in one society. Discourse analysis lead us to see language in a different way. Discourse refers to wide area of human life, therefore only discourse from the point of linguistics, and especially applied linguistics, is explained here. Discourse as use of language sees as a form of social practice (Fairclough 1995:5).