What many people do not understand is that gun control laws do not necessarily mean making guns illegal and banned from the possession of all citizens. If the laws in place now were followed and enforced the way that they were intended to be, then a stricter policy would not have been needed. By educating gun owners on how to safely use their weapons, many of the casualties coming from guns can be eliminated. If the appropriate steps are taken and we follow the laws meant to protect us, then certain bans and restrictions will not be necessary, and the number of gun homicides in our country would drastically
However, some people believe you shouldn’t be able to own a gun. Thanks to our Second Amendment, we, as citizens of the United States, have the right to defend ourselves. However, it’s difficult to predict what might happen if you didn’t own a gun in that scenario. The intruder could possibly have a firearm, there is nothing stopping them since they’re already disobeying the law by breaking and entering. Chances are that there will be a negative outcome, whether it’s death or simply the loss of property.
Do you think that greater gun control is a good idea? Maybe you’re aware but would you be willing to altercate to a certain extent to make sure your community feels protected? Perhaps you’re willing to get equal rights with gun laws , or just don’t like the idea of anyone being able to purchase and carry guns freely. Why carry a gun if eventually it will be used to innocent people, and for what? For your protection?
First and foremost, banning guns will not stop criminals from obtaining and committing crimes with them. Furthermore, guns don’t kill people; people kill people. Lastly, guns prevent the government from becoming tyrannical and oppressive. At first, one may think that banning guns would be a superb solution to the growing problem of gun violence. However, doing this will not stop felons from procuring and committing gun-related crimes.
If gun ownership is controlled by the government, only a limited number of people will be allowed to own guns. In addition, the regulations will make it difficult for people to access guns unless they have a concrete reason as to why they need the weapon. Moreover, if the ownership of guns is limited, it will help prevent unnecessary deaths and violence caused by gun owners, especially students. Gun ownership should be totally controlled and regulated by the government because they will help in limiting the number of people who own guns. When gun
Laws against theft will not apply to a person who plans to steal, in the same way laws against murder will not apply to a depressed person who wants to kill himself while taking down as many people as he can. Criminals will therefore still get a gun illegally and would not be worried about breaking the law on guns. A law abiding person on the other hand will not be able to buy a gun legally and would therefore not have the best option for self-defense if there was a gun ban. When people will have less self-defense forms, they will be more susceptible to violence. The gun ban will in turn give more leverage to the criminal than it would to the
Firearms is one of America’s most controversial topics, one side argues that guns should be outlawed and only permitted to those in association with the government, while the other side replies that guns should be buyable to law abiding citizens and should not be outlawed. I myself fall on the side that claims why guns should not be outlawed, and why we should be able to possess firearms if we do our duties as a citizen. In the constitution under amendment II, it states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, what this means is that no one should be able to take away our rights to keep and use firearms. But there are still people who think that guns are too dangerous and lead to an excessive amount of casualties, and instead would like to keep guns off the streets.. To that I respond with the phrase that guns don 't kill people, people kill people, what I mean here is that someone has to give the command to the gun for the bullet to come out. If our society wasn’t so corrupt then guns wouldn 't be debated on so much, because we wouldn 't have to worry about a criminal or mentally unstable person shooting an innocent human being.. And some people actually need guns, because they choose to live remotely and still hunt for food, even though this is extremely rare it still transpires.
The right to bear arms is still needed in today's time because anything can happen and it is best to be prepared at all times. Even though there are a lot of issues with the second amendment today, I would say that getting rid of guns would not fix the issue. It can cause a bigger issue because people would try to find an illegal way to buy a gun, which would cause more issues for the court systems. But, I would recommend that we have stricter gun laws because everyone should not be able to have access to buy guns in America. I believe that a mental-health check should be added to the process of being able to get a
Guns In America Crimes, violence, suicides, and deaths. If no action is taken those subjects that have relations with guns will go up, America needs to take action. Gun control will not take away gun rights. It will empower laws to get guns to the right citizens. Once again America needs to and should enforce gun control and reduce crimes, violence, suicides, and deaths.
The president should already have in mind to keep everyone safe from any harm. Gun use is out of control. In addition, many people are willing to mention the 2nd amendment in the bill of rights, when it comes to gun rights. “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Yes, "The right to bear arm" is needed but now it is overlooked and abused. The government may have a part with the bill it still follows the constitution.