Essay On Right To Bear Arms

1205 Words5 Pages
The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports. In contrast, Opponents believe that arms should have regulations because they cause violence, such as mass shootings and murder. Despite the differences on each side, the second amendment aids in the protection of all individual rights of the people to keep and bear arms for self defense when necessary. As a result, the definition of the right to bear arms has to be provided. The second amendment is quite a chicanery clause to understand, the first part of the clause stated “ a well-regulated militia.” “Well regulated…” was defined in the eighteenth century as properly but, not overly regulated (Roleff 69). In addition, “militia…” in the eighteenth century was defined as every free able bodied white male citizen at the age of eighteen to forty-five years old (Roleff 68). “A well regulated militia” is stated as the first clause to ensure that citizens will never have their firearms taken away to protect themselves. As a result, the clause created a deterrence against tyranny by the government, which in return provided citizens
Open Document