Brown had a familial history of using violence to achieve freedom and giving aid to oppressed people. Brown was named after his grandfather who was a captain in the Revolutionary War. He grew up a Calvinist, and his father instilled a strong sense of God fearing faith in him. Brown would later teach that same faith to his children. When Brown was twelve years of age, he caught sight of a slave boy, no older than himself, being beaten. Brown related to the young slave boys since they, like him, were both motherless and being beaten. Witnessing this, Brown started what he believed to be his "eternal war with slavery." Brown too had been motherless and his father would often strike him if he disobeyed, so Brown felt as though he could relate to the slave boy. Being beaten as a child for religious reasons, Brown believed that violence weeded out sin. He would beat his children and himself if they had sinned against the Lord. Brown believed he was also supposed to punish others if they sinned as well. When he was younger Brown would act on an …show more content…
The men that made up the group called “the Secret Six” were Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Reverend Theodore Parker, Franklin Sanborn, Dr. Samuel G. Howe, George Stearns, and Gerrit Smith. Dr. Howe, Sterns, and Sanborn were mostly financial providers and supporters for Brown’s raids, actions, and other antislavery events. Reverend Parker and Higginson not only financially supported Brown, but both were very outspoken about their abhorrence of slavery. When preaching, Parker tried his hardest to convince the congregation of the evils of slavery, and that it was a national problem: he considered the practice of slavery a national sin, not just a southern crime. Parker would write speeches and sermons condemning anything that advanced slavery and praising everything that harmed it, claiming these actions “inherently
Looking at what he has fought for, it’s no doubt that he fought for a noble cause which is the freedom of slavery. John Brown shouldn’t be known as hero or terrorists because of want he has done applies to both sides. John Brown shouldn’t be known as a terrorist or a national hero because of his violent attack and raids. After, September 11, 2001 John Brown has been called a terrorist which has caused controversy about Brown’s legacy and reputation. Furthermore, in the article, The 9/11 of 1859 says, “He led 21 men all but two in their 20s, and many of them radicalized by guerilla fighting in Bleeding Kansas, the abolitionists’ Afghanistan”(Horowitz).
“I felt for a number of years, Brown later wrote in a letter to a young abolitionist, a steady strong desire: to
In his life, Brown have made contact with many popular person who also share his beliefs about slavery, from Harriet Tubman, Frederick Douglass and Henry David Thoreau. He also is successfully gain financial support from partisans in the North. The author show Brown’s History though his tough time, the way he did to promote Abolitionist movement while dealing with the economy growth of Southern. Brown’s military strategy seems to be not existent.
He brutally kills many innocent people just because they are in his way. Although John Brown tries to end slavery, which is a good deed, he does use violence, and murder people who are innocent; therefore, John Brown is guilty of murder, treason, and insurrections. John Brown not only starts a very violent insurrection, almost like a war. He also brutally murders people who are just in his way. Insurrection means a violent uprising against authority.
He wanted to help all the slaves be free. In Brown’s last speech it states that he didn’t do any harm to anything.’’ I have done--on behalf of God’s despised poor was not wrong. ’’He even told them he wanted to free slaves. He was innocent but people thought otherwise.
Soon, the company was fully associated with the slave trade, and Moses Brown was part of it. On one voyage with the slave trade, the slaves caught diseases or were killed from unsuccessful revolts. After this voyage, the company’s slave trade business dropped and was not as involved in it as before. Soon the war was approaching and Brown started acting up against the slave efforts. He handed out anti slavery pamphlets and wrote in the General Press against slavery.
Figures such as William Lloyd Garrison and John Brown played a large role in strengthening the abolitionist movement. Garrison was a white abolitionist who wrote The Liberator, which held the message of emancipation of slaves. John Brown was an abolitionist who took matters into physical hands and started what was soon to be called Bleeding Kansas when he took a few of his followers and killed five men to send a message. These two men were few of many who helped stir support and cultivate power for the movement to get slavery abolished. Southerners presumed true that the Northerners were teaching the kids to hate the Southerner’s kids, which had started disagreement at a young age.
Brown grew up in a house that didn’t like people having slaves and was very religious. So every decision’s he made he didn’t regret because he was doing it for god or for the slaves. Everything he did he believed it was a mission from god.
John Brown was a man with a strong hatred for slavery who tried to lead a rebellion against it. After this he was called a “misguided fanatic” by Abraham Lincoln. Which leaves the question, was John Brown a “misguided fanatic”? I think John Brown was a misguided fanatic, or according to dictionary.com a, mistaken person with an extreme, uncritical enthusiasm, because he was so set in his rebellion that his mind couldn’t be changed even when told his plan wouldn’t go well, and although he was told his actions would be fatal he went on to do so . In The Life and Times of Frederick Douglass, Douglass states that there was no changing Brown
They despised his fanaticism and lawlessness. They saw him as a traitor and a murderer who violated the Constitution and the rights of states. They also considered his raid as a disaster that did not accomplish anything but more bloodshed and division. To reconcile John Brown’s actions within the context of the ongoing debates over slavery during the antebellum era, one might consider the following
John Brown was an abolitionist from the North who was raised to think that slavery was a sin. He was so devoted to God, that he broke many laws and killed a lot of white slave owners in order to achieve a "moral end." So in reality, he thought he was doing good and serving God's will, but he was actually costing lives and doing more bad than good. Over the course of his life, he had over twenty children with two wives and John Brown and his sons fought against slavery, which resulted in some sons dying. Brown moved his family a lot over many different states, and his home in Pennsylvania was a stop on the Underground Railroad.
John Brown therefore saw it as fair to attack with violence since fighting slavery would be very difficult. In 1855, he stated, “It is a war to the death between good and evil. We must fight fire with fire.” (Z). This justifies
Through his writings, Brown tells us he had no doubt in his intentions being for the better, choosing to ignore these lives lost as they didn’t serve to further his cause. Scott John Hammond tell us about John Brown’s calculated nature by comparing him to Machiavellian philosophies, a philosophy associated with the use of power in often ruthless means, “Given the fact that all founders and reformers will inevitably encounter resistance from those enemies … Machiavelli notes that a lawgiver … must go forth armed and prepared for struggle” and “A founder is consonant with the idea of virtue, or grandeur of soul - a character of extraordinary proportions, defined in terms of “ingenuity, skill, and excellence.”
Why did he wait until all other possible opportunities were passed? John Brown became a hero through the support and dependence from black individuals. He couldn’t make it alone in white society, and by using African American slaves who would take any help offered, John Brown finally became a success. He would never have been seen as a hero without using the African Americans. Although Brown died for the movement, his start was not necessarily for the purest of reasons.
Charlie Brown is an example of how anybody can live their life the way they want, no matter the way they were born. For the first half of his life, Charlie was a slave. After he was finally freed he met the love of his life at the plantation where she worked. He created a business in our own Brazoria County and bought the plantation where his wife, Isabella, worked as a slave. This was a time when African Americans were targeted for hate crimes and violence.