Masculinity and men are things in the world that always seem to go together. The correlation between the two is very present in the story, The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber, when defining Francis Macomber’s self worth. The main character, Francis Macomber, is many things: he is a husband, rich, and handsome. One thing he is not is brave. Francis Macomber pursues a mission to prove to people and himself that he is not the coward the people treat him to be. The repercussions of his decisions are fatal and lets the readers know that when a person’s ego has a bigger influence on their actions than logic does it becomes dangerous. Through life threatening acts, peer pressure, and recognition of self worth, Francis Macomber proves that he …show more content…
The author’s use of symbolism illustrates Francis’ pride as unwavering but also portrays his character as intimidated when it comes to face the unknown. The use of guns symbolises Francis’ need to be in control but he does not know how to handle intense situations. He wants to be the one shooting and hitting the targets but does not understand the reality of it. When he is finally experiencing the actuality of killing a ferocious animal the story states, “Macomber opened the breech of his rifle and saw he had metal bullets, shut the bolt and put his rifle on safety. He saw his hand was trembling.” (Hemingway 7). This proves that he is not ready for the responsibilities he put on himself but is too afraid to admit it because he does not want to be deemed a coward. One of the most significant symbols in Hemingway’s story is the use of lions. Lions represent everything Francis wants to be: manly, brave, and feared. It does take a little time for Francis to realize that these lions are not something that should be played with for social status. “He sat there, sweating under his arms, his mouth dry, his stomach hollow feeling, wanting to find courage to tell Wilson to go on and finish off the lion without him.” (Hemingway 10). This is a crucial quote because it lets the readers know that Francis has put himself into a situation where he does not know the …show more content…
Whether that means Wilson not having to constantly babysitting him during this trip or how his wife wants a husband she can be proud of, Francis never really lived up to their expectations. In comparison, Wilson is the one to act in the heroic manner that was expected. Where as Macomber comes to this land that is unfamiliar from a privileged life and he finds that he can not compensate his losses with money or his looks like he has done before. “He was dressed in the same sort of safari clothes that Wilson wore except that his were new, he was thirty-five years old, kept himself very fit, was good at court games, had a number of big-game fishing records, and had just shown himself, very publicly, to be a coward.” (Hemingway 1). The use of imagery here clearly tells the reader that the clothes he is wearing gives away who he really is. Instead of a experienced hunter look that he tries to copy from Wilson, he looks out of place. Hemingway also uses this description to build up his character to the readers only to be discouraged when Hemingway calls him a coward. Francis’ wife is one figure in his life that has a big negative impact in how he acts and the way he presents himself. Mrs. Macomber tends to treat to her husband in a way that makes the reader feel that this marriage has anything but love and support. She is manipulative and
McCandless’s tale struck a personal note that made a dispassionate rendering of the tragedy impossible. Throughout most of the book, I have tried– and largely succeeded, I think– to minimize my authorial
However, the author quickly juxtaposes this idea with demeaning details that reveal McTeague’s downfall. McTeague is “sluggish”, “stupid, docile [and] obedient”. These characteristics convey a lazy ambition and weakness to push boundaries. This juxtaposition creates a sense of pity due to the promise and strength that McTeague possess yet his indolent mind holds him back.
In Ray Bradbury's short story "The Veldt," the character of Mr. McClean is often overlooked when discussing the responsibility for the parents' death. However, upon closer examination of the story, it becomes clear that Mr. McClean is the most responsible for the parents' demise. In this essay, I will argue that Mr. McClean is responsible for the death of the parents, providing evidence from the story to support this claim, along with counterarguments to address possible objections. Firstly, Mr. McClean's negligence and recklessness are a significant factor in the parents' death.
This is an allusion to Hemingway’s quote about
When McCandless returned home his parents expressed their fears about his dangerous, daunting trips. Although he knew the dangerous situations he was putting himself through, he didn’t want to back down to his parents, “he wanted to prove to himself that he could make it on his own, without anybody else’s help” (178). He was tired of being babied by his parents, he wanted to show them that he was no longer a boy, but a man. McCandless’ refusal of his parent’s loving advice therefore proves that he wished to be his own person, stating the actions of his trip into the wild as being sane, and a product of independence.
From great risk, some fortunate few are able to reap the benefits. The title character of Edith Wharton’s “Ethan Frome” often toys with this notion but reaches an inability to act. With nothing risked there is nothing gained, effectively preventing his life from moving forward or backwards. Furthermore, risk does not always yield change, as sometimes the change is the risk, a deviation from the normality of one’s life. Ethan’s inability to take risks keeps his life stagnant, immune to change like a decomposed corps in a grave.
Masculinity was a very big deal to men all over the world in the 1950’s, not much less than the men of today’s society. Especially for David, the main character of James Baldwin’s Giovanni’s Room, who was experiencing some feelings that may cause him to question his masculinity. David’s guilt over these feelings affect the reader by making them feel his guilt as well. Baldwin shows David’s guilt through his use of syntax, diction, imagery.
The reader gets to join McCandless in his adventure across the country as he invents a new life for himself. He embraces the ideas and morals of Thoreau and Emerson in his journey. In the book, a man by the man by the name of Westerberg discusses about how McCandless is not destroying his possessions and journey around the wild because the wild he is suicidal or unintelligent. “You could tell right away that Alex was intelligent… He always had to know the absolute right answer before he could go on to the next thing.”
Authors often can emphasizes their theme in their works by using the setting, imagery, and other techniques. In Ernest Hemingway's short story "Soldier's Home" you can this techniques at work talking about how difficult it is for soldiers to adjust to normal life after combat. Hemingway used imagery and characterization well to describe how Krebs feels coming home from war. "Soldier's Home" is great at explaining the protagonists feelings in his situation with these techniques. The story is about a man named Harold Krebs who has returned from the Great War; It was one of the most gruesome and bloodiest wars the world has known up to that point.
Masculinity. It can be argued that no one word has undergone such a dramatic shift during the past century, as masculinity. In many ways J.D. Salinger’s groundbreaking novel, “The Catcher in the Rye”, and its main protagonist, Holden Caulfield, were both ahead of their time as they realized masculinity could not have a uniform definition. The reader is led on a journey by Holden, from fancy prep schools to the tough streets of New York City, all in the search for one thing: the meaning of masculinity. Holden’s search for identity culminates in his failure to conform to societal standards of masculinity, allowing Salinger to effectively question the need for such strict standards which seemingly only inhibit personal growth.
Although some of Christopher McCandless' decisions portray him as an anti-hero, his personality and determination demonstrate the qualities of a tragic hero, one who makes mistakes but still tries to follow his beliefs and ideals. Christopher McCandless is often described as a sociopath, and although he did hurt those around him, he was aware of what he had done and was beginning to reconcile with the idea of returning to society. McCandless had walked away from his parents and the life they had built for him. His father comments upon this, saying how he didn’t know how “‘a kid with so much compassion could cause his parents so much pain’” (104).
"Seven." The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love. First ed. Vol. 7.
Symbolism plays a fundamental role in Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants”. The different symbols used throughout the story are capable of subtly conveying intricate concepts to the readers of this recognized literary work. It then becomes essential for them to detect all these symbols, and discern the deep meanings which they hold in order to truly grasp the story’s message which the author intended to transmit. Without this insight, many first-time readers may view the story as a simple and casual dialog between two people, a man and a woman, waiting for a train from Barcelona to Madrid. Thus, they become unaware of the intense conflict the two main characters are actually facing, haunted by the difficult decision of terminating a pregnancy
“Hills Like White Elephants” may be a short story about two people just talking in a bar of a station, but behind every word Hemingway uses lies a deeper meaning. It is necessary to point out that omitting further information is something that is typical to Hemingway’s writing style. The reader has to contemplate what the author wants to portray in his story in the first place. Although the author probably had one meaning in mind, the metaphors can be interpreted in many ways. While reading the story, what came up to my mind was whether the author’s personal life had to do something with it or not.
The battle that The Old Man fights with the marlin, as well as the daunting task of defending the marlin from the countless sharks that follow the skiff, are two points in the novel where Hemingway really conveys the sense of struggling and suffering. This is how Hemingway tries to convey an underlying theme of the constant struggle between man and nature, by depicting the struggle between The Old Man and the Marlin, against all odds. The Old Man considers the fact that capturing the Marlin is such a great task for him since the Marlin is trying just as hard to evade and escape from The Old Man’s reach. Throughout this struggle, The Old Man, who eventually becomes very fatigued, keeps telling himself to push through the pain and bear it like a real man would. He pushes past the faintness and dizziness he experiences, he pushes himself to see beyond the black spots in his weary vision and he pushes past the pain in his hands to catch the Marlin which puts up a great fight against this frail old man.